MI · rules
MRPC Rule 6.5
Professional Conduct
(a) A lawyer shall treat with courtesy and respect all persons involved in the legal process. A
lawyer shall take particular care to avoid treating such a person discourteously or
disrespectfully because of the person’s race, gender, or other protected personal
Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 83 Updated with MSC order(s)
characteristic. To the extent possible, a lawyer shall require subordinate lawyers and
nonlawyer assistants to provide such courteous and respectful treatment.
(b) A lawyer serving as an adjudicative officer shall, without regard to a person’s race, gender,
or other protected personal characteristic, treat every person fairly, with courtesy and
respect. To the extent possible, the lawyer shall require staff and others who are subject to
the adjudicative officer’s direction and control to provide such fair, courteous, and respectful
treatment to persons who have contact with the adjudicative tribunal.
Duties of the Lawyer.
A lawyer is an officer of the court who has sworn to uphold the federal and state constitutions, to
proceed only by means that are truthful and honorable, and to avoid offensive personality. It
follows that such a professional must treat clients and third persons with courtesy and respect.
For many citizens, contact with a lawyer is the first or only contact with the legal system.
Respect for law and for legal institutions is diminished whenever a lawyer neglects the obligation
to treat persons properly. It is increased when the obligation is met.
A lawyer must pursue a client’s interests with diligence. This often requires the lawyer to frame
questions and statements in bold and direct terms. The obligation to treat persons with courtesy
and respect is not inconsistent with the lawyer’s right, where appropriate, to speak and write
bluntly. Obviously, it is not possible to formulate a rule that will clearly divide what is properly
challenging from what is impermissibly rude. A lawyer’s professional judgment must be
employed here with care and discretion.
A lawyer must take particular care to avoid words or actions that appear to be improperly based
upon a person’ s race, gender, or other protected personal characteristic. Legal institutions, and
those who serve them, should take leadership roles in assuring equal treatment for all.
A judge must act “ [a]t all times” in a manner that promotes public confidence in the impartiality
of the judiciary. Canon 2(B) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. See also Canon 5. By contrast, a
lawyer’s private conduct is largely beyond the scope of these rules. See Rule 8.4. However, a
lawyer’s private conduct should not cast doubt on the lawyer’s commitment to equal justice
under law.
A supervisory lawyer should make every reasonable effort to ensure that subordinate lawyers
and nonlawyer assistants, as well as other agents, avoid discourteous or disrespectful behavior
toward persons involved in the legal process. Further, a supervisory lawyer should make
reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect policies and procedures that do not
discriminate against members or employees of the firm on the basis of race, gender, or other
protected personal characteristic. See Rules 5.1 and 5.3.
Duties of Adjudicative Officers.
The duties of an adjudicative officer are included in these rules, since many legislatively created
adjudicative positions, such as administrative hearing officer, are not covered by the Code of
Judicial Conduct. For parallel provisions for judges, see the Code of Judicial Conduct.
Provenance
- Source
- www.adbmich.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-29
- Content hash
68fc7a03227416e0d0d2a593c746788a1c1b45c5d5c6e3311c96e83f18893ce9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.