MI · rules
MRPC Rule 3.9
Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings
A lawyer representing a client before a legislative or administrative tribunal in a nonadjudicative
proceeding shall disclose that the appearance is in a representative capacity and shall conform to
the provisions of Rules 3.3(a) through (c), 3.4(a) through (c), and 3.5.
In representation before bodies such as legislatures, municipal councils, and executive and
administrative agencies acting in a rule-making or policy-making capacity, lawyers present facts,
formulate issues, and advance argument in the matters under consideration. The decision -
making body, like a court, should be able to rely on the integrity of the submissions made to it.
A lawyer appearing before such a body should deal with the tribunal honestly and in conformity
with applicable rules of procedure.
Lawyers have no exclusive right to appear before nonadjudicative bodies, as they do before a
court. The requirements of this rule therefore may subject lawyers to regulations inapplicable to
advocates who are not lawyers. However, legislatures and administrative agencies have a right
to expect lawyers to deal with them as they deal with courts.
This rule does not apply to representation of a client in a negotiation or other bilateral transaction
with a governmental agency; representation in such a transaction is governed by Rules 4.1
through 4.4.
RULES 4.1–4.4. TRANSACTIONS WITH PERSONS OTHER THAN CLIENTS.
Provenance
- Source
- www.adbmich.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-29
- Content hash
0fe0ecb0f20bb5890e25f444ea82c9348c1761739b62942e5bdddfe1016be0fa
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.