MI · rules
MRPC Rule 1.3
Diligence
A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.
A lawyer should pursue a matter on behalf of a client despite opposition, obstruction or personal
inconvenience to the lawyer, and may take whatever lawful and ethical measures are required to
vindicate a client’s cause or endeavor. A lawyer should act with commitment and dedication to
the interests of the client and with zeal in advocacy upon the client’s behalf. However, a lawyer
is not bound to press for every advantage that might be realized for a client. A lawyer has
professional discretion in determining the means by which a matter should be pursued. See Rule
1.2. A lawyer’s workload should be controlled so that each matter can be handled adequately.
Perhaps no professional shortcoming is more widely resented than procrastination. A client’s
interests often can be adversely affected by the passage of time or the change of conditions; in
extreme instances, as when a lawyer overlooks a statute of limitations, the client’s legal position
may be destroyed. Even when the client’s interests are not affected in substance, however,
unreasonable delay can cause a client needless anxiety and undermine confidence in the lawyer’s
trustworthiness.
Unless the relationship is terminated as provided in Rule 1.16, a lawyer should carry through to
conclusion all matters undertaken for a client. If a lawyer’s employment is limited to a specific
matter, the relationship terminates when the matter has been resolved. If a lawyer has served a
client over a substantial period in a variety of matters, the client sometimes may assume that the
lawyer will continue to serve on a continuing basis unless the lawyer gives notice of withdrawal.
Doubt about whether a client-lawyer relationship still exists should be clarified by the lawyer,
preferably in writing, so that the client will not mistakenly suppose the lawyer is looking after
the client’s affairs when the lawyer has ceased to do so. For example, if a lawyer has handled a
judicial or administrative proceeding that produced a result adverse to the client but has not been
specifically instructed concerning pursuit of an appeal, the lawyer should advise the client of the
possibility of appeal before relinquishing responsibility for the matter.
Provenance
- Source
- www.adbmich.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-29
- Content hash
f0c97e6030129abe92c3cb865d83ddf08680ce5a27e37cfed1d534c58dc6baee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.