MRPC Rule 1.19

A lawyer shall not enter into an agreement for legal services with a client requiring that any

dispute between the lawyer and the client be subject to arbitration unless the client provides

informed consent in writing to the arbitration provision, which is based on being

(a) reasonably informed in writing regarding the scope and the advantages and disadvantages of

the arbitration provision, or

(b) independently represented in making the agreement.

MRPC 1.19 is designed to ensure that a client entering into an arbitration agreement with a

lawyer has sufficient information to make an informed decision or is independently represented

by counsel in making the agreement. This paragraph applies to agreements entered into at the

onset of an attorney-client relationship as well as to agreements entered into during the course of

the attorney-client relationship.

In order to ensure that client consent to an arbitration provision is informed consent, at a

minimum the agreement should advise the client of the practical advantages and disadvantages

of arbitration. Inclusion of the following information is presumed to be sufficient to enable a

client to give informed consent:

(1) By agreeing to arbitration, the client is

(a) waiving the right to a jury trial,

(b) potentially waiving the right to take discovery to the same extent as is

available in a case litigated in a court,

(c) waiving or limiting the right to appeal the result of the arbitration

proceeding to specific circumstances established by law, and

(d) agreeing to be financially responsible for at least a share of the arbitrator’s

compensation and the administrative fees associated with the arbitration;

(2) whether the agreement to arbitrate includes arbitration of legal malpractice claims

against the lawyer;

(3) identification of the organization or person(s) that will administer the arbitration;

(4) if the client declines to agree to arbitration at the onset of the attorney-client

relationship, there is no prohibition against the lawyer and the client agreeing to

arbitrate the matter at a later date;

(5) arbitration may be conducted as a private proceeding, unlike litigation in a court;

(6) the parties can select an arbitrator who is experienced in the subject matter of the

dispute;

Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 51 Updated with MSC order(s)

(7) depending on the circumstances, arbitration can be more efficient, expeditious and

inexpensive than litigation in a court; and

(8) the client’s ability to report unethical conduct by the lawyer is not restricted.

RULES 2.1–2.4. COUNSELOR.