MI · rules
MRPC Rule 1.12
Former Judge or Arbitrator
(a) Except as stated in paragraph (d), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a
matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other
adjudicative officer, arbitrator, or law clerk to such a person, unless all parties to the
proceeding consent after consultation.
(b) A lawyer shall not negotiate for employment with any person who is involved as a party, or
as an attorney for a party, in a matter in which the lawyer is participating personally and
substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or arbitrator. A lawyer serving as a law
clerk to a judge, other adjudicative officer, or arbitrator may negotiate for employment with
a party or attorney involved in a matter in which the clerk is participating personally and
substantially, but only after the lawyer has notified the judge, other adjudicative officer, or
arbitrator.
(c) If a lawyer is disqualified by paragraph (a), no lawyer in a firm with which that lawyer is
associated may knowingly undertake or continue representation in the matter, unless:
(1) the disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter and is
apportioned no part of the fee therefrom; and
(2) written notice is promptly given to the appropriate tribunal to enable it to ascertain
compliance with the provisions of this rule.
(d) An arbitrator selected as a partisan of a party in a multimember arbitration panel is not
prohibited from subsequently representing that party.
Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 34 Updated with MSC order(s)
This rule generally parallels Rule 1.11. The term “ personally and substantially” signifies that a
judge who was a member of a multimember court, and thereafter left judicial office to practice
law, is not prohibited from representing a client in a matter pending in the court, but in which the
former judge did not participate. So also the fact that a former judge exercised administrative
responsibility in a court does not prevent the former judge from acting as a lawyer in a matter
where the judge had previously exercised remote or incidental administrative responsibility that
did not affect the merits. Compare the comment to Rule 1.11. The term “ adjudicative officer”
includes such officials as judges pro tempore, referees, neutrals, special masters, hearing officers
and other parajudicial officers, and also lawyers who serve as part-time judges.
Provenance
- Source
- www.adbmich.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-29
- Content hash
607fc81801fd2bb22ff5dd3761035abf07132ccbb947d268455614d3fa3851b7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.