Bindinglaw

ME · rules

M.R. Prof. Conduct 1.7

CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS

activein force · 2023-09-28 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent

a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict-of-interest. A concurrent conflict-of-interest exists if:

(1) the representation of one client would be directly adverse to

another client, even if representation would not occur in the

same matter or in substantially related matters; or

(2) there is a significant risk that the representation of one or

more clients would be materially limited by the lawyer’s

responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third

person or by a personal interest of the lawyer.

(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict-of-interest

under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:

(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer would be able

to provide competent and diligent representation to each

affected client; and

(2) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in

writing.

(c) Under no circumstances may a lawyer represent a client if:

(1) the representation is prohibited by law;

(2) the representation involves the assertion of a claim by one

client against another client represented by the lawyer in the

same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal.

Provenance

Source
courts.maine.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
800ac35d7ee6f1817543ba0022a4e26bd2eb5d2721bb1f3100fb992384c381e7
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
M.R. Prof. Conduct 1.7 — CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST: CURREN… · binding.law