ME · rules
M.R. GAL 9
GUARDIAN AD LITEM REVIEW BOARD COMPLAINT SYSTEM
(a) Grounds for Discipline. It shall be misconduct and a ground for
discipline for a guardian ad litem to
(1) Violate or attempt to violate these Rules, chapter 32 of Title 4, Title
18-C, Title 19-A, Title 22, or an appointment order issued pursuant to them;
knowingly assist or induce another to do so; or do so through the acts of
another;
(2) Engage in conduct that violates the applicable rules of conduct for
guardians ad litem in another jurisdiction;
(3) Commit any criminal or unlawful act that reflects adversely on the
guardian ad litem’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a guardian ad litem;
(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or
misrepresentation;
(5) Have allegations of abuse or neglect against him or her
substantiated by the Maine Department of Health and Human Services;
(6) Fail to maintain compliance with the requirements in Rule 2 for
placement on the Roster;
(7) In the performance of guardian ad litem duties, by words or
conduct, manifest bias or prejudice based upon race, color, sex, religion,
national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status;
(8) Willfully violate an order imposing discipline under these Rules;
willfully fail to comply with a subpoena validly issued under these Rules; or
knowingly fail to respond to a lawful demand from a disciplinary authority,
except that this Rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise
protected by applicable rules relating to confidentiality; or
(9) Fail to comply with the duty to report set forth in Rule 5(i)(4).
(b) Jurisdiction.
(1) Guardians ad Litem. Any person on the Roster, or formerly on the
Roster with respect to acts committed while on the Roster, and any guardian ad
litem appointed to a case under Rule 2(a)(1), is subject to the jurisdiction of the
Review Board.
(2) Powers Not Assumed. This Rule shall not be construed to deny to
any court the powers necessary to maintain control over its proceedings.
(c) Period of Limitations. No disciplinary proceeding may be
commenced based on conduct alleged to have occurred more than six years
prior to the date a complaint is filed.
(d) Disciplinary Procedure.
(1) Complaint in Open or Closed Proceedings. Any party to an open or
closed proceeding under Title 18-C, Title 19-A, or Title 22, who wishes to
complain to the Review Board of misconduct by or incapacity of a guardian ad
litem appointed from the Roster in that proceeding, may submit to Central
Intake a written complaint on a form approved by the Review Board. A
complainant must inform the Review Board whether the case is pending and
whether a complaint has been filed with the judicial officer who is conducting
hearings on the case. The Review Board may open a file on a complaint but
shall not take any action with respect to, or initiate a review with respect to, a
pending case until the court issues a final judgment in that case, the court enters
an order allowing the Board to proceed, or the guardian ad litem is removed or
discharged.
(2) Complaint by nonparty. A judicial officer or Board Counsel may
submit a complaint to the Review Board regarding guardian ad litem
misconduct or incapacity at any time.
(3) Board Counsel Investigation. Board Counsel shall conduct all
investigations, except as otherwise required by these Rules.
(A) Board Counsel shall evaluate all relevant information including a
court’s decision on whether to remove the guardian ad litem, to
determine whether the information or complaint concerns a guardian ad
litem subject to jurisdiction under these Rules and whether the alleged
facts, if true, would constitute misconduct or incapacity. Board Counsel
shall dismiss a complaint if jurisdiction does not exist or if the facts would
not constitute misconduct or incapacity.
(B) If a complaint is dismissed, Board Counsel shall notify the
complainant and the respondent in writing that the complaint was
dismissed and the reason for the dismissal. This written notification shall
inform the complainant of his or her right to seek review of the dismissal
by a public member of the Review Board by submitting a written request
for review within 21 days after the date of the dismissal notice. Upon
receipt of a request for review, a public member shall be assigned by the
Board Clerk to review the complaint and Board Counsel’s investigation
materials, and the assigned public member shall either
(i) Approve the dismissal by Board Counsel, and direct the
Board Clerk to notify the complainant and the respondent that the
matter shall remain closed; or
(ii) Disapprove the dismissal by Board Counsel, and direct that
the matter be investigated further and/or that formal charges be
filed. The Board Clerk shall notify the complainant and the
respondent of the public member’s action in writing.
(C) If the matter is not dismissed, Board Counsel shall serve the
respondent in writing with notice of the substance of the matter and
afford him or her the opportunity to respond. Board counsel shall
provide the complainant a copy of any written communication from the
respondent relating to the matter, except that information that is subject
to the privilege held by a person other than the complainant shall be
redacted. Board Counsel shall refer the matter to the Board Clerk for a
hearing before a Review Board Panel.
(4) Pre-Hearing Procedures. If Board Counsel refers a matter to the
Review Board Panel, Board Counsel shall prepare formal charges in writing that
give fair and adequate notice of the nature of the alleged misconduct.
(A) Board Counsel shall file the formal charges with the Board Clerk.
Board Counsel shall serve a copy of the formal charges on the respondent
and shall mail a copy of the formal charges to the complainant.
(B) The Board Clerk shall assign the complaint to a three-member
Review Board Panel for hearing.
(C) The respondent shall file a written answer with the Board Clerk
and serve a copy on Board Counsel within 21 days after service of the
formal charges, unless the Chair of the Review Board Panel to which the
matter is assigned for review extends the time for good cause shown. If
the respondent fails to answer within the prescribed time, the factual
allegations and the alleged misconduct shall be deemed admitted. Board
Counsel shall provide a copy of respondent’s answer to the complainant,
or if necessary to protect a person other than the complainant or
respondent, Board Counsel shall provide a redacted version of the
answer to the complainant.
(D) No later than 21 days in advance of the hearing, the Board Clerk
shall serve a notice of hearing on Board Counsel and the respondent,
stating the date and place of hearing. The Board Clerk shall mail a copy
of the notice of hearing to the complainant. The notice of hearing shall
advise the respondent of the right to be represented by a lawyer, to cross-examine witnesses, and to present evidence, and shall advise the
complainant, if any, of the complainant’s right to make a statement to the
Review Board Panel concerning the respondent’s alleged misconduct and
the effect of the alleged misconduct on the complainant.
(E) At least 14 days before the hearing, the Board Clerk shall prepare
and deliver to Board Counsel a statement as to the existence or absence
of any disciplinary sanction record, reinstatement to the Roster, or
surrender of Roster membership involving the respondent. Board
Counsel shall then mail the statement to the respondent. The statement
and any reply from the respondent shall be provided to the panel only in
accordance with Rule 9(d)(4)(J).
(F) Discovery. Within 21 days after the respondent’s answer to the
formal charges is filed, Board Counsel and the respondent shall
(i) Exchange the names and addresses of all persons having
knowledge of relevant facts;
(ii) Identify which persons are reasonably anticipated to be
called as witnesses; and
(iii) Exchange all documents Board Counsel or the respondent
reasonably anticipate will be introduced at the hearing.
Upon good cause shown, the Chair of the Review Board Panel may order
additional discovery. The Chair of the Review Board Panel shall resolve
by order all disputes concerning discovery. All discovery orders are
interlocutory and may not be appealed prior to issuance of the Review
Board Panel decision.
(5) Hearing.
(A) Nature of the Proceeding. The Chair of the Review Board Panel shall
decide pre-hearing motions, shall preside at the hearing, and shall have
the power to control the course of proceedings and regulate the conduct
of those individuals appearing as counsel, parties, or witnesses.
Disciplinary hearings before the Review Board Panel are neither civil nor
criminal in nature, and neither the Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Rules
of Evidence apply. Evidence shall be admitted if it is the kind of evidence
upon which reasonable persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of
serious affairs. The Chair of the Review Board Panel may exclude
irrelevant or unduly repetitious evidence.
(B) Proceedings Public. The hearing shall be open to the public, except
that to protect the interests of a complainant, witness, child, third party,
or the respondent, the Chair of the Review Board Panel may, upon motion
filed with the Board Clerk and for good cause shown, issue a protective
order prohibiting the disclosure of privileged or confidential information
and direct that the proceedings be conducted so as to implement that
order.
(C) Burden and Standard of Proof. At the hearing, Board Counsel and
the respondent shall have the right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses. The testimony of witnesses shall be by oath or
affirmation administered by the Panel Chair. Board Counsel shall have
the burden of establishing the basis for discipline by a preponderance of
the evidence. A certified copy of a criminal conviction constitutes
conclusive evidence that the respondent has committed the underlying
crime.
(D) Hearings Recorded. The Board Clerk shall cause all proceedings
before the panel to be recorded in a form that will permit transcription.
A hearing transcript or partial transcript may be ordered at any time by
the Review Board Panel, the respondent, or Board Counsel. When
ordering a transcript, the respondent or Board Counsel must provide a
copy of the requested transcript to the opposing party.
(E) Related Pending Proceedings. Upon a showing of good cause, the
Review Board Panel may stay a disciplinary matter because of substantial
similarity to the material allegations of pending criminal or civil litigation
or professional disciplinary action.
(F) Cameras and Audio Recordings. Any person or organization
requesting permission to record or photograph disciplinary hearings
shall file a notice with the Board Clerk in advance of the hearing. Use of
cameras and audio recording or electronic devices at disciplinary
hearings is governed by the Administrative Order issued by the Supreme
Judicial Court governing the use of cameras and audio recording devices
in the courts.
(G) Failure to Appear. If the respondent fails to appear at the hearing
without good cause, he or she shall be deemed to have admitted the
factual allegations of misconduct that were to be the subject of the
hearing and/or to have waived objection to any motion or
recommendations scheduled to be addressed at the hearing. The Review
Board Panel may not, absent good cause, continue or delay proceedings
due to the respondent’s failure to appear.
(H) Inability to Properly Defend. If during a disciplinary proceeding the
respondent claims to be incapacitated and that the incapacity makes it
impossible to present an adequate defense, Board Counsel may
recommend that the Chief Judge immediately suspend the guardian ad
litem from the Roster pending a determination of the incapacity. The
disciplinary proceeding shall be stayed under this subsection only if the
Chief Judge determines that the guardian is unable to present an
adequate defense due to incapacity. The incapacitated respondent shall
remain on interim suspension until the Chief Judge determines that
capacity has been restored and orders that the disciplinary proceedings
be resumed.
(I) Waiver. Subject to approval by the Panel Chair, the requirements
governing the hearing process as established in these Rules may be
waived by a stipulated agreement of the parties.
(J) Disciplinary History. Board Counsel shall not divulge the statement
as to the existence or absence of any sanction record to the Review Board
Panel until after the Panel has made a finding of misconduct, unless the
statement is admissible as probative evidence on issues pending in the
matter before the Panel.
(6) Review Board Panel Decision. The deliberations of the Review
Board Panel following the hearing shall not be open to the public or the parties.
The Review Board Panel shall issue a written decision containing its findings of
fact, conclusions of law, and decision on dismissal or sanction to the Board Clerk
within 30 days after the hearing, unless the time for decision is otherwise
extended by the Chair of the Review Board. If a sanction is imposed, the
decision must state the basis for imposing the sanction. The Board Clerk shall
serve the decision on respondent and Board Counsel, who shall mail a copy to
the complainant. The Review Board Panel may render one of the following:
(A) Dismissal. If the Review Board Panel finds that Board Counsel has
not proven misconduct subject to sanction under these Rules, it shall
dismiss the matter;
(B) Reprimand. If the Review Board Panel finds that misconduct
subject to sanction under these Rules has occurred, it may issue a
reprimand if the misconduct is minor; there was no injury to a child, the
public, or the court; the respondent did not act intentionally; and there is
not a likelihood of recurrence; or
(C) Removal. If the Review Board Panel finds that misconduct subject
to sanction under these Rules has occurred but does not find that
reprimand is appropriate, the Panel shall order the removal of the
respondent from the Roster.
(7) Appeal of Review Board Panel Decision. A decision of the Review
Board Panel shall constitute final agency action and is reviewable as provided
in Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 80C and the Maine Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 M.R.S. § 11001 et seq., except that the requirement of service set out in 5
M.R.S. § 11003(1)(C) shall not apply.
(e) Complaints Against the Review Board and Board of Overseers
Members. If a complaint is filed against a guardian ad litem who is a member
of the Review Board or Board of Overseers, the matter shall proceed in
accordance with these Rules, except that the Chief Justice of the Maine Supreme
Judicial Court shall appoint Special Counsel who shall exercise independent
authority to investigate the complaint and, if the Chief Justice deems it
necessary, assign an ad hoc Review Board Panel to the case. Special Counsel
shall not receive compensation for his or her services but may seek
reimbursement from the Review Board for the payment of reasonable expenses
and for investigative, administrative, and legal support.
(f) Service and Notice. Service of formal charges or of any other
papers or notices required by these Rules shall be sufficient if made by first
class mail addressed to the guardian ad litem’s office and/or residence address
as provided by the guardian ad litem in the registration materials required by
Rule 8(b). Service is complete upon mailing. The Board Clerk or Board Counsel
may, at their discretion, use additional methods of service and notice (e.g., e-
mail or telephone communication) if previous attempts at providing service or
notice in the manner required by this Rule have failed.
(g) Subpoena Power.
(1) Investigatory Subpoenas. Before formal charges have been filed,
Board Counsel may compel by subpoena the attendance of witnesses or the
respondent and the production of pertinent books, papers, and documents in
accordance with Rule 45 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.
(2) Subpoenas For Hearing. After formal charges are filed, Board
Counsel or the respondent may compel by subpoena the attendance of
witnesses, including the respondent, and the production of pertinent books,
papers, and documents at a hearing under these Rules in accordance with Rule
45 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.
(3) Enforcement of Subpoenas. The Chief Judge may, upon proper
application, enforce the attendance and testimony of any witnesses or the
respondent and the production of any documents subpoenaed under these
Rules.
(4) Quashing Subpoena. Any person to whom a subpoena has been
issued under this Rule may object to the subpoena, may move to quash or
modify the subpoena as set forth in Rule 45 of the Maine Rules of Civil
Procedure, and may appear through legal counsel for that purpose. Any
objection to a subpoena so issued, or any motion to quash or modify such a
subpoena, shall be heard and determined by the chair of the Review Board
Panel before which the matter is pending or by the Chief Judge when
enforcement of the subpoena is being sought.
(5) Witnesses And Fees. Subpoena and witness fees and mileage shall
be as provided for proceedings in the Maine District Court.
(6) Subpoena Pursuant to Law of Another Jurisdiction. Whenever a
subpoena is sought in Maine pursuant to the law of another jurisdiction for use
in guardian ad litem discipline proceedings, and where the issuance of the
subpoena has been duly approved under the law of the other jurisdiction, the
Chair of the Review Board, upon good cause shown, may issue a subpoena in
accordance with Rule 45 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.
(h) Immediate Interim Suspension from the Roster. Board Counsel
shall file a petition with the Chief Judge upon receipt of evidence, either from
the guardian through report pursuant to Rule 5(i)(4) or from another reliable
source, suggesting the existence of a ground for immediately suspending a
guardian ad litem from the Roster.
(1) Petition. A petition for immediate interim suspension shall include
the following:
(A) The information demonstrating a ground for the immediate
suspension of a guardian from the Roster;
(B) Except in cases of alleged incapacity, a certification that Board
Counsel has filed formal charges against the guardian ad litem in
accordance with Rule 9(d)(3); and
(C) A certification that Board Counsel has served or made a reasonable
attempt to serve the guardian ad litem or the guardian ad litem’s personal
representative, if any, with notice of the information filed with the Chief
Judge.
(2) Mandatory Grounds for Immediate Interim Suspension. The Chief
Judge shall immediately suspend a guardian ad litem from the Roster if:
(A) The Chief Judge finds probable cause to believe that the guardian
ad litem has violated these Rules and that the violation threatens
immediate and irreparable injury to a child, the public, or the court;
(B) The guardian ad litem is incapacitated, and the incapacity
threatens immediate and irreparable injury to a child, the public, or the
court. For the purposes of this Rule, evidence that the guardian ad litem
is “incapacitated” includes evidence that the guardian ad litem: (i) has
been judicially declared incompetent; (ii) has been acquitted of a crime
by reason of mental illness; (iii) has been committed to a mental health
hospital after a judicial hearing; (iv) has been voluntarily admitted to a
mental health hospital for acute care; (v) has been voluntarily admitted
to a substance abuse facility for extended treatment; or (vi) has been
placed by a court under guardianship or conservatorship or the
equivalent in another jurisdiction; or
(C) The guardian ad litem has been formally charged with a “serious
crime” as defined in Rule 1(c)(19).
(3) Discretionary Grounds for Immediate Interim Suspension. The Chief
Judge may immediately suspend a guardian ad litem from the Roster if the Chief
Judge concludes that the immediate suspension of the guardian ad litem is
necessary to protect a child, the public, or the court.
(4) Immediate Interim Suspension Order. Upon examination of the
evidence transmitted and of any rebuttal evidence that the guardian ad litem
has submitted, the Chief Judge may order the immediate suspension of the
guardian ad litem from the Roster, pending final disposition of a Review Board
Panel hearing predicated on the same grounds. Alternatively, the Chief Judge
may order such other action as the Chief Judge deems appropriate. A copy of
the Chief Judge’s order shall be served on Board Counsel and the guardian ad
litem.
(5) Notice of Suspension. A guardian ad litem subject to an interim
suspension shall comply with the requirements of Rule 9(m).
(6) Rescission of Interim Suspension. The Chief Judge may, in his or her
discretion, vacate the interim suspension if the guardian ad litem shows by
clear and convincing evidence that the grounds for the interim suspension no
longer exist. The Chief Judge’s decision to vacate the interim suspension shall
not automatically terminate any formal disciplinary proceeding pending
against the guardian ad litem, the disposition of which shall be determined by
the Review Board.
(7) No appeal. Neither party shall have the right to appeal the decision
of the Chief Judge on immediate interim suspension or rescission of interim
suspension.
(8) Further Proceedings When Guardian ad Litem is Alleged to be
Incapacitated. If a guardian ad litem is subject to an interim suspension based
on alleged incapacity, Board Counsel shall notify the Board Clerk, who shall
assign the matter to a Review Board Panel. If Board Counsel proves the
respondent’s incapacity by a preponderance of the evidence at a hearing before
the Review Board Panel, the Panel shall issue a decision removing the
respondent from the Roster for incapacity.
(i) Discipline by Consent and Surrender of Appointment on
Roster.
(1) Discipline by Consent. A guardian ad litem against whom a
complaint or formal charges have been filed may tender to Board Counsel a
conditional admission in exchange for a stated form of discipline. The Review
Board Panel may approve or reject the tendered conditional admission and
discipline order. There is no right to appeal from an order of discipline by
consent.
(2) Surrender of Appointment. A guardian ad litem who is the subject
of an investigation under these Rules may submit to the Board Clerk a signed,
notarized letter of surrender of appointment to the Roster and shall send a copy
of the letter to Board Counsel. Upon receipt of such surrender, the Board Clerk
shall file it with the Chief Judge. The Chief Judge may accept the surrender or
may enter such order that the Chief Judge deems appropriate. Any order
accepting a surrender of appointment shall be a matter of public record unless
otherwise ordered in whole or in part by the Chief Judge for good cause shown.
(j) Reciprocal Discipline.
(1) Notification. Within 30 days after being disciplined or the
equivalent in another jurisdiction, a guardian ad litem on the Roster shall
promptly inform Board Counsel.
(2) After receiving notification from any source that a guardian ad
litem on the Roster has been disciplined or was the subject of administrative
action in another jurisdiction, Board Counsel shall
(A) Obtain a certified copy of the disciplinary order or equivalent; and
(B) File formal charges against the guardian ad litem with the Board
Clerk and serve the respondent with notice of those charges.
(3) Discipline To Be Imposed. The Review Board Panel shall conduct a
hearing on the formal charges pursuant to Rule 9(d)(4) and impose an
appropriate sanction authorized by Rule 9(d)(5), unless the respondent
demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that reciprocal discipline
should not be imposed.
(k) Access to Disciplinary Information.
(1) Confidentiality. Prior to service of Board Counsel’s formal charges,
the proceeding is confidential, except that the pendency, subject matter, and
status of an investigation by Board Counsel may be disclosed by Board Counsel
if there is a need to notify another person or entity in order to protect a child,
the public, or the court.
(2) Release of Confidential Information To Authorized Entities. In order
to protect a child, the public, or the court, Board Counsel may provide access to
relevant to authorized entities including courts in Title 18-C, Title 19-A, and
Title 22 proceedings; members of the Review Board; the Chief Judge;
jurisdictions investigating qualifications for appointment of guardians ad litem
or considering reciprocal disciplinary action; relevant professional licensing
agencies; and law enforcement agencies.
(3) Public Information. All filings with the Board Clerk or the Office of
the Chief Judge related to proceedings under this Rule shall be available to the
public after the filing and service of formal charges, unless the complainant, the
respondent, or Board Counsel obtains a protective order for specific testimony,
documents, or records.
(4) Public Proceedings. Upon service of formal charges upon the
respondent, all proceedings shall be public except for the deliberations of both
the Review Board Panel and the Single Jurist and except for information with
respect to which the Review Board Panel, Single Jurist, or Chief Judge has issued
a protective order.
(5) File Retention and Copying. The Review Board shall retain all files.
Files may be retained in a digital format. Copying and attestation fees shall be
the same as those for proceedings in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.
(l) Dissemination of Disciplinary Information.
(1) Public Notice.
(A) The Board Clerk shall issue, electronically or otherwise, a news
release to general media outlets throughout Maine regarding the
suspension, surrender, or removal of a guardian ad litem from the Roster.
(B) The Board Clerk shall publish on the Review Board’s website public
hearing decisions issued by Review Board Panels and decisions from
appeals pursuant to Rule 9(d)(6).
(2) Additional Notice. The Board Clerk shall transmit, electronically or
otherwise, notice of all public disciplinary sanctions, surrenders, suspensions,
and reappointments of Roster membership to members of the Review Board
and to the following:
(A) The Chief Judge;
(B) The Director of the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program;
(C) The guardian ad litem disciplinary authority in any other
jurisdiction known to the Review Board in which the guardian ad litem
has been appointed;
(D) All State, Federal, and Tribal Courts in Maine;
(E) The regulatory body for the guardian ad litem’s underlying
profession; and
(F) Any other such organization as determined by the Review Board.
(m) Guardian ad Litem Duties Following Discipline.
(1) Recipients of Notice; Contents. Unless otherwise ordered, within 30
days after a surrender or the date of a decision or order imposing suspension
or removal from the Roster, respondent shall notify the following in writing of
the nature of the discipline, and of the respondent’s disqualification to act as
guardian after the effective date of the order:
(A) The courts in all Title 18-C, Title 19-A, and Title 22 proceedings in
which the guardian ad litem is currently appointed;
(B) Any parents in all Title 18-C, Title 19-A, and Title 22 proceedings in
which the guardian ad litem is currently appointed; and
(C) Any counsel in all Title 18-C, Title 19-A, and Title 22 proceedings in
which the guardian ad litem is currently appointed.
(2) Duty to Maintain Records. The guardian ad litem shall keep and
maintain records of the steps taken to accomplish the requirements of this
subsection and shall make those records available to Board Counsel on request.
(3) Refund of Fees. Within 10 days after entry of the order imposing
suspension or removal, the guardian ad litem shall refund any unearned
portion of fees paid in advance.
(4) New Appointments Prohibited. Upon the effective date of an order
suspending or removing guardian ad litem from the Roster, the affected
individual shall not accept any new appointments as a guardian ad litem under
Title 18-C, Title 19-A, or Title 22. The affected individual shall not advertise
that he or she is a guardian ad litem and shall discontinue any advertisements
indicating that he or she is a guardian ad litem.
(5) Affidavit Filed. Within 10 days after the effective date of the
suspension or removal, the guardian ad litem shall file with Board Counsel an
affidavit
(A) Showing compliance with the provisions of the decision or order
and with this Rule;
(B) Identifying all other jurisdictions in which the guardian ad litem is
currently qualified to act as a guardian ad litem; and
(C) Identifying the residence or other addresses where
communications may thereafter be directed.
(n) Application for Return to Roster. A guardian ad litem who has
been removed from the Roster or who has surrendered his or her appointment
from the Roster may be reappointed to the Roster only by order of the Chief
Judge after submitting an application pursuant to Rule 2 of these Rules.
(1) A guardian ad litem who has been removed from or who has
surrendered from the Roster for incapacity may apply one year after the
removal or surrender and, if the application is denied, may reapply no more
than once a year thereafter.
(2) A guardian ad litem who has been removed from the Roster for
misconduct or who has surrendered from the Roster after a complaint is filed
may apply five years after the removal or surrender and, if the application is
denied, may reapply after the time specified by the Chief Judge in the decision
denying the application.
(o) Immunity. Members of the Review Board, Board Counsel, Special
Counsel, ad hoc Review Board Panel members appointed by the Chief Justice of
the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, and the Board of Overseers and its staff or
any person acting on their behalf, shall be immune from suit to the extent
permitted by statute and other provisions of law.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
3babdb831b535ce8b9aab4ff9aafb7cf57284b2230570cb56da88a05b3dd924f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.