ME · rules
M.R. Evid. 804
EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE AGAINST HEARSAY—WHEN THE DECLARANT IS UNAVAILABLE AS A WITNESS
(a) Criteria for being unavailable. A declarant is considered to be
unavailable as a witness if the declarant:
(1) Is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the
declarant’s statement because the court rules that a privilege
applies;
(2) Refuses to testify about the subject matter despite a court order to
do so;
(3) Testifies to not remembering the subject matter;
(4) Cannot be present or testify at the trial or hearing because of death
or a then-existing infirmity, physical illness, or mental illness; or
(5) Is absent from the trial or hearing and the statement’s proponent
has not been able, by process or other reasonable means, to
procure the declarant’s attendance.
But this subdivision (a) does not apply if the statement’s proponent
procured or wrongfully caused the declarant’s unavailability as a witness
in order to prevent the declarant from attending or testifying.
(b) The exceptions. The following are not excluded by the rule against
hearsay if the declarant is unavailable as a witness:
(1) Former Testimony. Testimony that:
(A) Was given as a witness at a trial, hearing, or lawful
deposition, whether given during the current proceeding or
a different one; and
(B) Is now offered against a party who had—or, in a civil case,
whose predecessor in interest had—an opportunity and
similar motive to develop it by direct, cross-, or redirect
examination.
(2) Statement under the belief of imminent death. A statement that the
declarant, while believing the declarant’s death to be imminent,
made about its cause or circumstances.
(3) Statement against interest. A statement—except, in a criminal case,
for a statement or confession made by a defendant or other person
implicating both the declarant and the accused that is offered
against the accused—that:
(A) A reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have
made only if the person believed it to be true because, when
made, it was so contrary to the declarant’s pecuniary or
proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject the declarant
to civil or criminal liability or to render invalid a claim by the
declarant against another, or to make the declarant an object
of hatred, ridicule, or disgrace; and
(B) Is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly
indicate its trustworthiness, if it is offered in a criminal case
as one that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability.
(4) Statement of personal or family history. A statement about:
(A) The declarant’s own birth, adoption, legitimacy, ancestry,
marriage, divorce, relationship by blood, adoption, or
marriage, or similar facts of personal or family history, even
though the declarant had no way of acquiring personal
knowledge about that fact; or
(B) Another person concerning any of these facts, as well as
death, if the declarant was related to the person by blood,
adoption, or marriage or was so intimately associated with
the person’s family that the declarant’s information is likely
to be accurate.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
464f268f75011c86710d8c63f8209066dd35c8d4276614c2b5d86c1d2a1a090a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.