ME · rules
M.R. Evid. 706
COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT WITNESSES
(a) Appointment process. On a party’s motion or on its own, the court may
order the parties to show cause why expert witnesses should not be
appointed and may ask the parties to submit nominations. The court may
appoint any expert that the parties agree on and any of its own choosing.
But the court may only appoint someone who consents to act.
(b) Expert’s role. The court must inform the expert of the expert’s duties.
The court may do so in writing and have a copy filed with the clerk or may
do so orally at a conference in which the parties have an opportunity to
participate. The expert:
(1) Must advise the parties of any findings the expert makes;
(2) May be deposed by any party;
(3) May be called to testify by the court or any party; and
(4) May be cross-examined by any party, including the party that called
the expert.
(c) Compensation. The expert is entitled to reasonable compensation, as
set by the court. Unless provided otherwise by law, the parties must pay
the expert’s compensation in whatever proportion the court directs, at a
time chosen by the court. Thereafter, the expert’s compensation may be
charged in the same manner as other costs.
(d) Disclosing the appointment to the jury. The court may authorize
disclosure to the jury that the court appointed the expert.
(e) Parties’ choice of their own experts. This rule does not limit a party in
calling its own experts.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
d8f7c72911f5b110fef5c77ce6ffb46ed9532b4baef68c044f7e4c551fd675d0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.