Bindinglaw

ME · rules

M.R. Evid. 611

MODE AND ORDER OF EXAMINING WITNESSES AND PRESENTING EVIDENCE

activein force · 2018-08-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Control by the court; purposes. The court must exercise reasonable

control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting

evidence so as to:

(1) Make those procedures effective for determining the truth;

(2) Avoid wasting time; and

(3) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.

(b) Scope of cross-examination. Cross-examination may address matters

relevant to any issue in the case, including the credibility of any witness.

The court may limit cross-examination about matters that were not

addressed on direct examination.

(c) Leading questions. Leading questions should not be used on direct

examination except as necessary to develop the witness’s testimony.

Ordinarily, the court should allow leading questions:

(1) On cross-examination; and

(2) When a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness

identified with an adverse party. A hostile witness or a witness

identified with an adverse party may be cross-examined by the

adverse party, but only as to matters that the witness testified to

during his or her examination in chief.

(d) Cross-examination relating to signatures. If a witness’s examination

in chief addresses only the signature to or execution of a paper,

cross-examination must be limited to that signature or execution.

Provenance

Source
courts.maine.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
90df1daa2c4c7bdce0559ae6c18f41947c1ac4d91e775fd3670af055c2c8c10e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
M.R. Evid. 611 — MODE AND ORDER OF EXAMINING WITNESSE… · binding.law