ME · rules
M.R. Evid. 609
IMPEACHMENT BY EVIDENCE OF A CRIMINAL CONVICTION
(a) In general. Evidence of a criminal conviction offered to impeach a
witness’s character for truthfulness must be admitted if its probative
value outweighs its prejudicial effect on a criminal defendant or on any
party in a civil action if the criminal conviction is:
(1) For a crime that, in the convicting jurisdiction, was punishable by
death or by imprisonment for more than one year; or
(2) For any crime if the court can reasonably determine that
establishing the elements of the crime required proving—or the
witness admitting—a dishonest act or false statement.
(b) Time limit. Evidence of a conviction is admissible under this rule only if:
(1) Less than 15 years has passed since the conviction; or
(2) Less than 10 years has passed since the witness was released from
confinement for the conviction.
(c) Effect of a pardon, annulment, or certificate of rehabilitation.
Evidence of a conviction is not admissible if the conviction has been the
subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other
equivalent procedure.
(d) Juvenile adjudications. Evidence of a juvenile adjudication in a public
proceeding is admissible under this rule. Evidence of a juvenile
adjudication in a proceeding that was closed to the public is admissible
only in juvenile proceedings that are also closed to the public.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
9370f4327f5db3a0feb435ccbd714107cd95ce2278c638685ec49cbf1c88f5d4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.