Bindinglaw

ME · rules

M.R. Evid. 609

IMPEACHMENT BY EVIDENCE OF A CRIMINAL CONVICTION

activein force · 2018-08-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) In general. Evidence of a criminal conviction offered to impeach a

witness’s character for truthfulness must be admitted if its probative

value outweighs its prejudicial effect on a criminal defendant or on any

party in a civil action if the criminal conviction is:

(1) For a crime that, in the convicting jurisdiction, was punishable by

death or by imprisonment for more than one year; or

(2) For any crime if the court can reasonably determine that

establishing the elements of the crime required proving—or the

witness admitting—a dishonest act or false statement.

(b) Time limit. Evidence of a conviction is admissible under this rule only if:

(1) Less than 15 years has passed since the conviction; or

(2) Less than 10 years has passed since the witness was released from

confinement for the conviction.

(c) Effect of a pardon, annulment, or certificate of rehabilitation.

Evidence of a conviction is not admissible if the conviction has been the

subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other

equivalent procedure.

(d) Juvenile adjudications. Evidence of a juvenile adjudication in a public

proceeding is admissible under this rule. Evidence of a juvenile

adjudication in a proceeding that was closed to the public is admissible

only in juvenile proceedings that are also closed to the public.

Provenance

Source
courts.maine.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
9370f4327f5db3a0feb435ccbd714107cd95ce2278c638685ec49cbf1c88f5d4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.