Bindinglaw

ME · rules

M.R. Evid. 1005

COPIES OF PUBLIC RECORDS TO PROVE CONTENT

activein force · 2018-08-01 – presentact-effective-date

The proponent may use a copy to prove the content of an official record—or of

a document that was recorded or filed in a public office as authorized by law—

if these conditions are met: the record or document is otherwise admissible;

and the copy is certified as correct in accordance with Rule 902(4) or is testified

to be correct by a witness who has compared it with the original. If no such

copy can be obtained by reasonable diligence, then the proponent may use

other evidence to prove the content.

Provenance

Source
courts.maine.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
efc7b50013d9bcb65a81211966c2a4d7cade77e11fea251a13f46b7a0053804f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
M.R. Evid. 1005 — COPIES OF PUBLIC RECORDS TO PROVE C… · binding.law