ME · rules
M.R.U. Crim. P. 72
DISCOVERY
(a) In General. A party shall not be entitled to discovery in a
proceeding for post-conviction review unless, and to the extent that, the court,
upon motion and for good cause shown, grants leave for discovery. If leave
for discovery is granted, the court shall specify the appropriate means of
discovery, provided that depositions shall be ordered only pursuant to Rule 15.
(b) Discovery From Former Defense Counsel. If ineffective
assistance of counsel is a ground of the petition and the respondent needs
discovery from that defense counsel, the respondent may move for discovery,
including an order requiring defense counsel to answer questions intended to
allow the respondent to evaluate and respond to the petitioner’s assertions of
ineffective assistance. The motion shall state the nature of the disclosure
sought and why it is needed. The motion shall be granted by the court for
good cause shown. If leave for discovery is granted, the court shall specify the
means, scope, and timing of discovery to be employed.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
d74bec912f3288417fcc626e5c272d72ace45907b6fa2093faed707a74db3ad5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.