Bindinglaw

ME · rules

M.R. Civ. P. 60

RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER

activein force · 2026-06-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Clerical Mistakes. Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other

parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may

be corrected by the court at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of

any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders. During the pendency

of an appeal, such mistakes may be so corrected before the appeal is docketed

in the Superior Court or Law Court, and thereafter while the appeal is pending

may be so corrected with leave of the Superior Court or Law Court.

(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered

Evidence; Fraud, etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may

relieve a party or the party’s legal representative from a final judgment, order,

or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or

excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could

not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);

(3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic),

misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment

is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior

judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it

is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application;

or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. The

motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2), and

(3) not more than one year after the judgment, order, or proceeding was

entered or taken. A motion under this subdivision (b) does not affect the

finality of a judgment or suspend its operation. This rule does not limit the

power of a court to entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a

judgment, order, or proceeding. Writs of coram nobis, coram vobis, audita

querela, and bills of review and bills in the nature of bills of review are

abolished as means of reopening judgments entered under these rules, and the

procedure for obtaining any relief from a judgment shall be by motion as

prescribed in these rules or by an independent action.

Provenance

Source
courts.maine.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
64c0f7fe04eaa0985434179b22906bd88b2e2958e95278aaf2559ed9978d27bf
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
M.R. Civ. P. 60 — RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER · binding.law