ME · rules
M.R. Civ. P. 33
INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES
(a) Availability; Procedures for Use. Any party may serve upon any other
party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party
served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or
governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such
information as is available to the party. Interrogatories may, without leave of
court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon
any other party with or after service of the summons, complaint, and notice
regarding Electronic Service upon that party. Unless otherwise ordered by the
court, more than one set of interrogatories may be served, but not more than a
total of 30 interrogatories may be served by a party on any other party. Each
distinct subpart in an interrogatory shall be deemed a separate interrogatory
for the purposes of this rule.
Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing
under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection
shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answers are to be signed by the person
making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them. The
party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the
answers, and objections if any, within 30 days after the service of the
interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers or objections
within 45 days after service of the summons, complaint, and notice regarding
Electronic Service upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or
longer time. The party submitting the interrogatories may move for an order
under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to answer an
interrogatory. A party in responding to interrogatories shall set forth each
interrogatory in full immediately preceding the party’s answer or objection
thereto.
(b) Scope; Use at Trial. Interrogatories may relate to any matters which
can be inquired into under Rule 26(b), and the answers may be used to the
extent permitted by the rules of evidence.
An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable
merely because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or
contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the court may
order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated
discovery has been completed or until a pretrial conference or other later time.
(c) Option to Produce Business Records. Where the answer to an
interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records,
including electronically stored information, of the party upon whom the
interrogatory has been served or from an examination, audit or inspection of
such business records, or from a compilation, abstract or summary based
thereon, and the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer is substantially
the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served, it is a
sufficient answer to such interrogatory to specify the records from which the
answer may be derived or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the
interrogatory reasonable opportunity to examine, audit or inspect such records
and to make copies, compilations, abstracts or summaries.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
0e37269b21ebf467a8e2c213d15b5115d0db627b242a9ace1ddf26a40e027795
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.