ME · rules
M.R. Civ. P. 16
PRETRIAL PROCEDURE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
(a) Case Management.
(1) Standard Scheduling Order. Unless otherwise ordered by the
court, after the filing of the answer in any civil action in the Superior Court other
than proceedings pursuant to Rule 80, 80B or 80C, the court shall enter a
standard scheduling order setting deadlines for a conference of counsel
concerning discovery, the joinder of additional parties, the exchange of expert
witness designations and reports, the scheduling and completion of an
alternative dispute resolution conference when required by Rule 16B, the
completion of discovery, the filing of motions, and the placement of the action
on the trial list. The standard scheduling order shall not be modified except in
accordance with Rule 16(a)(2) or on motion for good cause shown. The joinder
of additional parties after the standard scheduling order has issued shall not
require a modification of the scheduling order except on motion for good cause
shown.
(2) Modified Scheduling Order. On motion by a party filed within
30 days of the entry of the standard scheduling order, or at any time on the
court’s own initiative, the standard scheduling order may be modified or
supplemented to address the requirements of a case not addressed by the
standard scheduling order. The court, after conferring with the parties and
considering the nature of the case, may in the modified or specialized
scheduling order establish deadlines, schedules, and other orders for the
efficient preparation of the case for trial. Once entered, the modified scheduling
order shall not be further modified except for good cause shown.
(b) Pretrial Order and Trial Management Conference. Unless the court
has ordered otherwise when the action is placed on the trial list, the court shall
enter a pretrial order setting deadlines for final pretrial filings and settlement
discussions. The pretrial order shall be issued not later than 30 days prior to
the commencement of the trial session and shall not be modified except on
motion for good cause shown. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the
court may defer the pretrial order and order the parties to file pretrial
memoranda, briefs or such other filings as the court may direct. The court may
conduct a trial management conference. Unless excused for good cause, each
party shall be represented at the trial management conference by the attorney
who is to conduct the trial and who shall be prepared to represent the party’s
position on settlement and on all matters involved in the conduct of the trial.
At the trial management conference, the parties shall be prepared and
authorized to discuss settlement in good faith. The court may conduct a
settlement conference and may direct the parties, their insurers, and their
authorized representatives to appear at the settlement conference and to
participate in good faith.
(c) Reserved.
(d) Sanctions. If a party fails to comply with the requirements of this rule
or any order made hereunder, the court may impose upon the party or the
party’s attorney, or both, such sanctions as the circumstances warrant, which
may include the dismissal of the action or any part thereof with or without
prejudice, the default of a party, the exclusion of evidence at the trial, and the
imposition of costs including attorney fees and travel. The court may expressly
order that the costs of sanctions be borne by counsel and not paid by counsel’s
client.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
683469c15e54036367cf7639dc062007379e5c3fc5142ee73a7d3c62b044316d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.