ME · rules
M.R. App. P. 24
REPORT OF CASES
(a) Report by Agreement of Important or Doubtful Questions.
When the trial court is of the opinion that a question of law presented to it is of
sufficient importance or doubt to justify a report to the Law Court for
determination, it may so report when:
(1) all parties appearing agree to the report;
(2) there is agreement as to all facts material to the appeal; and
(3) the decision thereon would, in at least one alternative, finally
dispose of the action.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) Report of Interlocutory Rulings. If the trial court is of the opinion
that a question of law involved in an interlocutory order or ruling made by it
ought to be determined by the Law Court before any further proceedings are
taken, it may on motion of the aggrieved party report the case to the Law Court
for that purpose and stay all further proceedings except such as are necessary
to preserve the rights of the parties without making any decision therein.
(d) Determination by the Law Court. Any action reported pursuant
to this Rule shall be entered in the Law Court and proceed as any other appeal,
with the plaintiff or the party aggrieved by a reported interlocutory ruling being
treated as the appellant. In a civil case, the appellant shall pay the fee for filing
of a notice of appeal promptly following entry of the order of report.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.maine.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
5051d21f26c0fac47e78f8ea8981db28bfe0aa1c0fc360181415bcaf2e5fb333
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.