Bindinglaw

ME · rules

M.R. App. P. 24

REPORT OF CASES

activein force · 2024-11-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Report by Agreement of Important or Doubtful Questions.

When the trial court is of the opinion that a question of law presented to it is of

sufficient importance or doubt to justify a report to the Law Court for

determination, it may so report when:

(1) all parties appearing agree to the report;

(2) there is agreement as to all facts material to the appeal; and

(3) the decision thereon would, in at least one alternative, finally

dispose of the action.

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Report of Interlocutory Rulings. If the trial court is of the opinion

that a question of law involved in an interlocutory order or ruling made by it

ought to be determined by the Law Court before any further proceedings are

taken, it may on motion of the aggrieved party report the case to the Law Court

for that purpose and stay all further proceedings except such as are necessary

to preserve the rights of the parties without making any decision therein.

(d) Determination by the Law Court. Any action reported pursuant

to this Rule shall be entered in the Law Court and proceed as any other appeal,

with the plaintiff or the party aggrieved by a reported interlocutory ruling being

treated as the appellant. In a civil case, the appellant shall pay the fee for filing

of a notice of appeal promptly following entry of the order of report.

Provenance

Source
courts.maine.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
5051d21f26c0fac47e78f8ea8981db28bfe0aa1c0fc360181415bcaf2e5fb333
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
M.R. App. P. 24 — REPORT OF CASES · binding.law