Bindinglaw

MD · rules

Worcester Cnty. Cir. Ct. Civil DCM Plan (introduction)

Worcester County Circuit Court Civil DCM Plan

activein force · 2018-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

July 1, 2018 (Revised)

Circuit Court for Worcester County, Maryland

Table of Contents

 Track 1 – Civil Expedited Cases

 Track 2 – Civil Standard Cases

 Track 3 – Civil Complex Cases

 Track 4 – Foreclosure Cases

This Civil DCM Plan is established in accordance with Md. Rule 16-302(b) which requires

the County Administrative Judge to develop and, upon approval by the Chief Judge of the

Maryland Court of Appeals, implement and monitor a case management plan for the prompt

and efficient scheduling and disposition of action in the Circuit Court.

Statement of Purpose

From the commencement of litigation to its resolution, whether by trial or settlement,

any elapsed time other than reasonably required for pleadings, discovery, and Court events, is

unacceptable and should be eliminated. To enable just and efficient resolution of cases, the

Court, not the lawyers or litigants, should control the pace of litigation. A strong judicial

commitment is essential to reducing delay and once achieved, maintaining a current docket.

(Standard 250, ABA Standards Relating to Court Delay Reduction)

It is the purpose of this DCM Plan to provide an effective case management system

which will assure:

Provenance

Source
www.mdcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
4df609f5538d13091984c7d2566ee49a492253ddf9a4d82fbcae8fbe239bc8c6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.