MD · rules
Queen Anne's Cnty. Cir. Ct. Family DCM Plan III
POSTPONEMENT POLICY
A party who desires a change of the time of any trial, hearing or conference shall
immediately obtain several possible alternate times from the Assignment Commissioner and,
within 5 days thereafter:
(1) Attempt to secure the agreement of all other parties to one of those alternate times;
and
(2) File with the Clerk a written request for change to one of those alternate times.
On its own initiative, or if all parties are not agreed, the county administrative judge or
his designee may act upon the request ex parte or submit the matter to conference under Md.
Rule 2-504.1(b). Whether or not the parties have discussed and/or agreed upon an alternate date,
any existing Notice of Trial, Scheduling Order or Pretrial Order remains in full effect until the
change has been approved in writing by the administrative judge or his designee. If a change of
date is approved, all instructions or provisions of the original Notice or Order so modified remain
fully applicable to the new date.
In considering all postponement or continuance requests, the court shall carefully apply
all relevant sections of the Maryland Annotated Code and the Maryland Rules of Procedure,
review possible effects of a postponement or continuance on the parties and witnesses in the
case, and evaluate future scheduling issues. The court shall also consider Maryland Circuit
Court Time Standards for processing cases.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
16ce509e9c3f4879d12ab795cc768dc54faeffd523ead33da22d0f2d20d86664
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.