MD · rules
Queen Anne's Cnty. Cir. Ct. Family DCM Plan I
CIVIL DOMESTIC MATTERS
A. SCHEDULING
When a domestic matter such as divorce, annulment, child custody and/or access, child
support, alimony/spousal support or the modification of such, is filed with the court, the clerk
issues an appropriate summons to the non-moving party.
The clerk’s office identifies those cases in which there has been no activity for 60 days
and notice is issued advising the moving party of the need to timely take further action. If no
action is taken in response to the notice, the matter is referred to the assignment commissioner
for scheduling of a status conference before the magistrate or judge or the matter is dismissed,
depending on the circumstances of the case.
The court holds two (2) regularly scheduled dockets each month for the purposes of
scheduling and status conferences and motions hearings, but matters may be specially set to
accommodate specific circumstances, ensure compliance with time standards and in the interests
of judicial economy.
1. Status Conference
At the status conference, the magistrate advises the moving party of the need to take
further action and sets another status conference. If the moving party takes further action, the
status conference is vacated, and the matter proceeds as is appropriate. If the moving party fails
to take further action, the case is dismissed at the second status conference.
2. Uncontested Matters
If an answer is filed indicating no contested issues, the assignment commissioner will set
the case before the magistrate as soon as is practicable. In cases when a default is entered, the
matter is scheduled at least 30 days after entry of the default, consistent with the Md. Rules.
3. Scheduling Conference
If an answer is filed indicating that there are contested issues, the assignment
commissioner will set the case for a scheduling conference before the magistrate. The
scheduling conference is set within 30-45 days after filing of the answer and notices are issued.
All counsel and parties are required to appear at the scheduling conference. The
magistrate determines the disputed issues and establishes dates and deadlines for the progression
of the case, including deadlines for discovery, designation of experts, and the filing of pre-trial
statements, proposed joint statements of marital/non-marital property and the joint statement
concerning decision-making authority and parenting time, as may be appropriate. The magistrate
will also set a date for a settlement conference, which is typically scheduled within 30 days after
the close of discovery. The deadline for filing a pre-trial statement, proposed joint statement of
marital/non-marital property and joint statement concerning decision-making authority and
parenting time, as may be appropriate, is 10 days prior to the date of the settlement conference.
At the scheduling conference, the magistrate may recommend family services, including,
but not limited to, co-parenting education, the appointment of child counsel, psychological
evaluation, or a substance use assessment. The family services coordinator aides the court in
preparing the referral orders. The magistrate may also refer certain cases to day-of-court
mediation, when available. Otherwise, except as proscribed by Md. Rule 9-205(b), all other
cases are referred to mediation. The deadline for mediation is approximately ten (10) days prior
to the close of discovery.
If requested, and deemed necessary and appropriate by the magistrate, a date for a
pendente hearing may be set at the scheduling conference. The pendente lite hearing is
scheduled as soon as is practicable given the circumstance of the case and the magistrate’s
calendar.
The magistrate’s recommendations, the proposed scheduling order, the proposed family
service orders, if any, and the mediation order are then forwarded to the judge for consideration
and signature.
4. Settlement Conference
Settlement conferences take place before a senior judge or the magistrate. The court holds
four (4) regularly scheduled dockets each month for the purposes of settlement conferences.
Two (2) dates are before a senior judge and two (2) dates are before the magistrate. Matters may
be specially set to accommodate specific circumstances, ensure compliance with time standards
and in the interests of judicial economy. All parties and all attorneys who will be litigating the
case must appear at the settlement conference.
Continuing a settlement conference is strongly discouraged and will only be permitted in
extreme circumstances. If the matter has not been fully resolved at a settlement conference
before the senior judge, the parties shall immediately appear before the presiding judge for a
discussion of the issues and a trial date will be set. If the presiding judge is not available, the
parties shall immediately proceed to assignment for the scheduling of trial. Trial is set no more
than 90 days after the settlement conference. In cases that are fully settled before the senior
judge, whether or not the terms of the agreement are placed on the record before the presiding
judge, a status conference shall be scheduled within 45 days to allow for submission of a consent
order.
If the matter has not been fully resolved at a settlement conference before the magistrate,
a trial date is obtained from assignment by the magistrate and deadlines are established for
updating financial information, where appropriate. A trial/hearing is typically set no more than
90 days after the settlement conference. Depending on the contested issues, the trial/hearing may
be scheduled before the judge or the magistrate, as the parties agree, and as may be convenient to
the court’s calendar. In cases that are fully settled before the magistrate, the terms of the
agreement are placed on the record before the magistrate and a status conference is scheduled
within 45 days to allow for submission of a consent order, or the magistrate will prepare the
order. In cases that are partially settled before the magistrate, the terms of partial agreement are
placed on the record before the magistrate and the magistrate will prepare the order. In all
settlement conferences before the magistrate, regardless of the outcome, recommendations are
issued and forwarded to the judge for review and consideration, consistent with the Md. Rules.
B. TRIAL/HEARING
In trials scheduled before the judge, if a ruling is not issued from the bench, an opinion
and order or judgment is timely filed.
In hearings scheduled before the magistrate, the magistrate announces the findings of fact
and recommendations on the record, schedules the matter for further proceedings in which a
written report is generated and read into the record, or holds the matter sub curia and issues a
written report. In all circumstances, the magistrate’s report, recommendations and findings of
fact and a proposed order are forwarded to the judge for review and consideration, pursuant to
the Md. Rules. If exceptions to the magistrate’s findings of fact and recommendations are filed,
an exceptions hearing is scheduled before the judge as soon as is practicable and in accordance
with the timelines established by the Md. Rules.
C. CHILD SUPPORT MATTERS
1. Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE)-Paternity and
Establishment/Modification of child support
When a paternity and/or child support action is filed by the OCSE, the clerk issues a
summons. The petition/complaint and summons are forwarded to the OCSE for service, or to the
sheriff, as may be requested by the OCSE. At such time as an answer or affidavit of service is
filed, the matter is set for a hearing that is at least 30 days from the date of filing of the answer or
affidavit. If an affidavit of service is not filed after 120 days, a notice of contemplated dismissal
will be issued by the clerk’s office.
Paternity and establishment/modification of child support matters are scheduled before
the magistrate. The court has one (1) regularly scheduled docket each month for these matters.
However, matters may be specially set to accommodate specific circumstances, ensure
compliance with time standards and in the interests of judicial economy.
In cases where paternity has not yet been established, the matter will be scheduled before
the magistrate for an initial appearance. During the proceedings, the alleged father will be
advised of the allegations contained in the petition and afforded the opportunity for genetic
testing. If testing is requested, an order will be issued establishing the date, time and location of
genetic testing. A hearing will also be scheduled to determine paternity and to proceed with
establishment of child support, if appropriate. The hearing is typically scheduled on the first
child support docket following the date the genetic testing is scheduled to occur. If testing is
waived and the alleged father admits to paternity, the matter will proceed on that day with the
establishment of child support, where requested.
If paternity has already been established, or the parties have submitted to voluntary
genetic testing and have already received the results of that testing, the magistrate will proceed
with testimony regarding the establishment of child support, where requested.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the magistrate announces the findings of fact and
recommendations on the record and written recommendations are distributed in the courtroom.
The magistrate’s report, recommendations and findings of fact and a proposed order are
forwarded to the judge for review and consideration, pursuant to the Md. Rules. If exceptions to
the magistrate’s findings of fact and recommendations are filed, an exceptions hearing is
scheduled before the judge as soon as is practicable and in accordance with the timelines
established by the Md. Rules.
If an establishment/modification of child support matter is filed by the OCSE and a
custody action is pending, the companion custody action will be noted on the case and no action
will be taken in the child support matter until the custody action is resolved. It is the goal of the
court to schedule the custody and child support matters at or around the same time to preserve
the interests of justice and promote judicial economy.
2. Private party actions for establishment/modification of child support
When a private party files for establishment or modification of child support, the matter
proceeds as described in earlier sections of this case management plan. In those circumstances
where the action is contested, an abbreviated scheduling conference occurs before the magistrate.
The parties are referred to mediation, when appropriate, given deadlines to exchange certain,
specified financial documents and the parties are given a date for a hearing before the magistrate.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the magistrate announces the findings of fact and
recommendations on the record and written recommendations are distributed in the courtroom.
In rare circumstances, the magistrate may schedule the matter for further proceedings in which a
written report is generated and read into the record, or the magistrate holds the matter sub curia
and issues a written report. In all circumstances, the magistrate’s report, recommendations and
findings of fact and a proposed order are forwarded to the judge for review and consideration,
pursuant to the Md. Rules. If exceptions to the magistrate’s findings of fact and
recommendations are filed, an exceptions hearing is scheduled before the judge as soon as is
practicable and in accordance with the timelines established by the Md. Rules.
3. Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) -Request for suspension or
reinstatement
Requests for suspension by the OCSE are treated as motions requiring a certificate of
service and are given an 18-day response period. A motion to suspend may be ruled on without a
hearing, unless a response is filed opposing the requested relief.
If a motion to reinstate is filed by the OCSE, and the matter has been closed for more
than 30 days, the clerk will issue a summons to be served on the opposing party and forward the
summons and motion to the OCSE or the sheriff, as may be requested by the OCSE. A motion
to reinstate may be ruled on without a hearing, unless a response is filed opposing the requested
relief.
D. CIVIL CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
1. Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE)
In contempt actions filed by the OCSE for non-payment of child support, the OCSE files
a contempt petition and proposed show cause order. The matter is reviewed by the magistrate
and a date is set for an initial appearance before the magistrate. The date of the initial
appearance is at least 75 days from the date of the filing of the petition. The clerk also issues a
summons. The petition, the show cause order and the summons are forwarded to the OCSE for
service, or to the sheriff, as may be requested by the OCSE.
If unserved within five (5) days before the date of the initial appearance, the clerk’s office
will remove the initial appearance from the docket and the OCSE must file a request to reissue.
If the unserved party appears in court on the date of the initial appearance and, after fully being
advised of his or her due process rights, consents, the magistrate may proceed with the initial
appearance on that date.
At the initial appearance, the party alleged to be in contempt is advised of the allegations
contained in the petition, his right to counsel and the matter is scheduled for further contempt
proceedings. The magistrate may also make referrals to community resources, including
available employment programs. If, after further contempt proceedings occur, the magistrate
concludes that a referral to the judge for contempt is appropriate, the magistrate will provide the
alleged contemnor with both an oral and written advice of rights and a date to return for a
contempt hearing before the judge. The contempt hearing is scheduled before the judge within
60 days of the last proceeding before the magistrate.
When it is determined at a court proceeding that regular child support payments have
been received, or that the alleged contemnor is in compliance with the directives of the court, no
further hearings will be scheduled, and the case will be closed.
The court holds two (2) regularly scheduled dockets each month for the purposes of
addressing the OCSE contempt matters, one (1) day each before the judge and the magistrate.
Matters may be specially set to accommodate specific circumstances, ensure compliance with
time standards and in the interests of judicial economy.
2. Private party
In contempt actions filed by private individuals, the magistrate will review the petition for
contempt and prepare a show cause order for the judge’s consideration. If incarceration is
requested in the petition for contempt, a notice of rights is included as part of the show cause order.
All privately filed c onstructive civil contempt matters are typically set before the magistrate,
regardless of whether or not jail time is requested
When issued, the show cause order contains a date for a show cause hearing and the
deadlines for service of the petition and order and the filing of an answer. The date for the show
cause hearing is typically set 45 days from the date of issuance of the show cause order.
The show cause order also provides a deadline for filing an affidavit of service or request
to reissue. The deadline is approximately ten (10) days after the deadline established for service.
Once the deadline has passed, and after review by the magistrate, if an affidavit of service or
request to reissue has not been filed, an order will be issued dismissing the matter.
At the show cause hearing, the magistrate announces the findings of fact and
recommendations on the record, schedules the matter for further proceedings in which a written
report is generated and read into the record, or holds the matter sub curia and issues a written
report. In all circumstances, the magistrate’s report, recommendations and findings of fact and a
proposed order are forwarded to the judge for review and consideration, pursuant to the Md.
Rules. If exceptions to the magistrate’s findings of fact and recommendations are filed, an
exceptions hearing is scheduled before the judge as soon as is practicable and in accordance with
the timelines established by the Md. Rules.
If there are reasonable grounds to believe that a party is in contempt and that
incarceration is an appropriate sanction, the magistrate will conclude the proceedings without a
recommendation and reset the matter before the judge, pursuant to Md. Rule 9-208(d).
E. EMERGENCY RELIEF
When an emergency hearing request is filed, the magistrate or the judge will review the
matter to determine whether emergency and/or expedited relief is appropriate. Typically,
emergency/expedited matters are reviewed by the magistrate or judge on the same date they are
filed and/or processed by the clerk’s office.
Upon review, if the court determines that there is a “credible prospect of imminent and
substantial physical or emotional harm to a child or vulnerable adult,” as set forth in Md. Rule
16-302(2)(A), an emergency hearing will take place the same day. If the court determines that
there are credible threats to “imminently terminate services necessary to the physical or mental
health, sustenance of the child or vulnerable adult or the imminent removal of the child or
vulnerable adult from the jurisdiction of the court,” consistent with the intent of Md. Rule 16-
302(2)(A), an order may be issued setting the matter for an expedited pendente lite hearing
before the magistrate. If the court determines that emergency circumstances do not exist, then the
court will direct that the matter proceed with scheduling in the normal course as described in
earlier sections of this case management plan.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
55e333a7e41caff290b60c659c9aecbdfb401fe9279f983489398c45e5dd687b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.