MD · rules
Queen Anne's Cnty. Cir. Ct. Civil DCM Plan (introduction)
Queen Anne's County Circuit Court Civil DCM Plan
This Civil Non-Domestic DCM Plan is established in accordance with Md. Rule 16-
302(b)(1)(A) which requires the County Administrative Judge to develop and, upon approval by
the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, implement and monitor a case
management plan for the prompt and efficient scheduling and disposition of action in the Circuit
Court. The plan shall include a system of differentiated case management in which actions are
classified according to complexity and priority. This plan serves as a guide to the management of
cases in Queen Anne’s County and is a product of the collaborative effort of the county
administrative judge, court administrator, and clerk of the circuit court. The provisions set forth
in this plan are intended to serve as a general guide for the processing of cases which come
before the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County. The provisions are not intended to be rigid,
given that circumstances related to any particular case may require flexibility to ensure fairness
and efficiency. Further, the Civil DCM Plan is prepared within the confines of case time
standards. The Plan does not purport to override any requirements of the Md. Rules or the
Annotated Code of Maryland.
The purpose of a DCM Plan is to provide just and efficient resolution of cases. The court,
not the lawyers or litigants, must control the pace of litigation. A strong judicial commitment is
essential to reducing delay and once achieved, maintaining a current docket. (Standard 250, ABA
Standards Relating to Court Delay Reduction). An effective case management system should
assure: equal treatment of all litigants by the court; timely disposition consistent with the
circumstances of the individual case; enhancement of the quality of the litigation process; and
public confidence in the court as an institution.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
c2d7077a9b2f6dd153d3433ff3af148088e60ca802122942186ed7c9c85c8712
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.