MD · rules
Frederick Cnty. Cir. Ct. Criminal DCM Plan 4
The files will be immediately sent to the Clerk’s Office for processing and immediate faxing of the
Order of Evaluation to the appropriate facility(ies).
Postponement Policy and Procedure
Pursuant to Md. Rule 16-105, all postponement requests must be considered by the County
Administrative Judge or designee. The designated postponement judge shall be authorized to make
good cause findings and to rule on waivers of the Hicks requirement. Pursuant to the Rule, only one
judge may be designated to have postponement authority at a time. This and the below information
is outlined in the Administrative Orders concerning the Postponement Policy for the Circuit Court for
Frederick County at:
https://www.mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/import/clerks/frederick/pdfs/postponementofallot
hercases20220826.pdf
AND
https://www.mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/import/clerks/frederick/pdfs/actingadminjudge202
20826.pdf
Specially Assigned Cases
Except as stated below, this limitation on postponement authority applies to all cases in the Circuit
Court, including cases that are specially assigned to a judge. The procedures for postponing specially
assigned cases are set forth below.
If the case is specially assigned, subsequent case management decisions and scheduling will be
initiated by the specially assigned judge consistent with the case time standards. However, pursuant
to Md. Rule 16-105, all postponements or scheduling that affects the trial date or the 180-day Hicks
period, must be made by the judge who is designated by the County Administrative Judge to rule on
postponements. The designated postponement judge will confer with the specially assigned judge for
a recommendation as to the postponement and to clear new court dates on the assigned judge’s
calendar. The scheduling or re-scheduling of all specially assigned cases must also be cleared in
advance with the Assignment Office and the Jury Office in order to ensure judicial and juror
availability.
VOP and Sentencing Hearings
These limitations do not apply to VOP, post-conviction, coram nobis, sentencing, or modification
hearings. In those matters, the judge to whom the case is assigned, may schedule and postpone them
in the judge’s discretion.
Clearing New Dates
Any party requesting a postponement of a trial or any other hearing shall coordinate a proposed re-set date with the opposing party and the Assignment Office consistent with case time standards.
Failure to coordinate a re-set date may result in the postponement being denied. Compliance with
this procedure does not guarantee that any postponement will be granted and will not be interpreted
by the Court as constituting consent to the postponement.
Same Day Postponements
Counsel requesting postponement of a case on the day it is set for trial or hearing shall bring it to the
Court’s attention at the beginning of the criminal docket and shall promptly be referred to the
Designated Postponement Judge for consideration. If the postponement request is denied, the case
shall be referred back to the criminal docket judge for further handling.
The above-mentioned procedure shall not apply to VOP, post-conviction, coram nobis, sentencing, or
modification hearings. In those cases, requests for postponement shall be made to the judge to whom
the case is assigned.
Hicks Issues
If the postponement of any event will, in any way, implicate the Hicks Rule, a Hicks waiver or finding
of good cause must be made in open court, by the designated postponement judge. The defendant
shall be present in open court and written waivers will not be accepted. If necessary, counsel may
coordinate a postponement/Hicks hearing with the chambers of the Criminal Case Management
Judge.
Plea Agreement Policy
Track 1 – Jury Demands and District Court Appeals
Jury Demands: The defendant may plead guilty before the administrative judge or the trial judge;
where a Pre-Trial Hearing may be scheduled, before the judge handling that docket. If a defendant is
already on probation before a Circuit Court judge, the defendant may seek leave to plead guilty
before and/or be sentenced by that judge.
Appeals: The defendant may plead guilty before the judge assigned to handle the Pre-Trial Hearing
docket or the judge assigned to the Trial Docket. If a defendant is already on probation before a
Circuit Court judge, the defendant may seek leave to plead guilty before and/or be sentenced by that
judge.
Tracks 2 and 3 – Felony Charges
Under the revised Criminal DCM Plan, plea agreements in cases designated Track 2 may be accepted
by any judge up to and including the Pre-Trial Conference date, which may be postponed once for the
purposes of reaching a plea agreement, or by the administrative judge on the Pre-Trial Conference
date. If the parties reach a plea agreement on the hearing date of a pretrial motion, the judge assigned
to hear that motion will take the plea. The parties may request that a case be scheduled for a plea at
any time prior to the scheduled trial date.
In Track 3 cases, a plea agreement may only be accepted by the specially assigned judge, who is
also the trial judge.
The sentencing date will be set before whichever judge accepted the plea agreement.
It is the County Administrative Judge’s policy that all pleas should be heard and disposed of prior to
the originally scheduled trial date. Trial dates will not be removed until the completion of the hearing
in which the plea agreement is executed. Trial dates may not be moved to accommodate a guilty plea
(without a finding of good cause by the administrative judge).
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
d0db9360f3644b71327e704595ce9413d9974d0cc23429a6f4af32ff1e924760
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.