MD · rules
Frederick Cnty. Cir. Ct. Civil DCM Plan (introduction)
Frederick County Circuit Court Civil DCM Plan
FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
CIVIL DIFFERENTIATED CASE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
January 2023
This Plan has been approved by the County Administrative Judge of the Circuit Court for Frederick
County, upon authority of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Maryland.
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW
This Civil Differentiated Case Management (DCM) Plan is established in accordance with Md. Rule 16-
302(b), which requires the County Administrative Judge to develop and, upon approval by the Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court of Maryland, implement and monitor a case management plan for the
prompt and efficient scheduling and disposition of actions in the Circuit Court.
Statement of Purpose
This Civil DCM Plan has been created to provide effective case management in compliance with the
Maryland Rules while also providing a predictable course of action and timely resolution for all civil
cases. To enable just and efficient resolution of cases, without compromising due process, the Court
will schedule meaningful events, included in several tracks to facilitate timely disposition.
Postponement requests are governed by a written policy approved by the County Administrative
Judge, with a view to curbing delay wherever possible.
It is the purpose of this DCM Plan to provide an effective case management system, which will assure:
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
0a31b16b61026c612d351b43cdb4765f2c520c4e54c61384a1d5d6edbf867a98
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.