MD · rules
Charles Cnty. Cir. Ct. Family DCM Plan (introduction)
Charles County Circuit Court Family DCM Plan
The Circuit Court for Charles County, Maryland
Family Differentiated Case Management (DCM) Plan
Page | i
Table of Contents
Page | ii
Introduction
This Family1 Differentiated Case Management (DCM) Plan is established in accordance with
Md. Rule 16-302(b)(1)(A) that requires the County Administrative Judge to develop and,
upon approval by the Chief Judge of the Maryland Court of Appeals, implement and monitor
a case management plan for the prompt and efficient scheduling and disposition of action
in the circuit court. Differentiated Case Management (DCM) is a system for managing cases
based on their relative complexity and need for judicial involvement.
Statement of Purpose
From the commencement of litigation to its resolution, whether by trial or settlement, any
elapsed time other than reasonably required for pleadings, discovery, and court events, is
unacceptable and should be eliminated. To enable just and efficient resolution of cases, the
court, not the lawyers or litigants, should control the pace of litigation. A strong judicial
commitment is essential to reducing delay and, once achieved, maintaining a current
docket. (Standard 2.50, ABA Standards Relating to Court Delay Reduction2)
It is the purpose of this DCM Plan to provide an effective case management system that will
assure:
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
68552faad6167cffb551e0bab1b7d7d8b686d5a59da7e681e932f59464911698
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.