Bindinglaw

MD · rules

Charles Cnty. Cir. Ct. Family DCM Plan (introduction)

Charles County Circuit Court Family DCM Plan

activein force · 2026-09-30 – presentact-effective-date

The Circuit Court for Charles County, Maryland

Family Differentiated Case Management (DCM) Plan

Page | i

Table of Contents

Page | ii

Introduction

This Family1 Differentiated Case Management (DCM) Plan is established in accordance with

Md. Rule 16-302(b)(1)(A) that requires the County Administrative Judge to develop and,

upon approval by the Chief Judge of the Maryland Court of Appeals, implement and monitor

a case management plan for the prompt and efficient scheduling and disposition of action

in the circuit court. Differentiated Case Management (DCM) is a system for managing cases

based on their relative complexity and need for judicial involvement.

Statement of Purpose

From the commencement of litigation to its resolution, whether by trial or settlement, any

elapsed time other than reasonably required for pleadings, discovery, and court events, is

unacceptable and should be eliminated. To enable just and efficient resolution of cases, the

court, not the lawyers or litigants, should control the pace of litigation. A strong judicial

commitment is essential to reducing delay and, once achieved, maintaining a current

docket. (Standard 2.50, ABA Standards Relating to Court Delay Reduction2)

It is the purpose of this DCM Plan to provide an effective case management system that will

assure:

Provenance

Source
www.mdcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
68552faad6167cffb551e0bab1b7d7d8b686d5a59da7e681e932f59464911698
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.