MD · rules
Calvert Cnty. Cir. Ct. Family DCM Plan 2.5
Tracks
(a) Track One -- Expedited Domestic Track. An action shall be assigned to an expedited
track when it appears that the matter is uncontested.
(b) Track Two -- Standard Domestic Pro Se Track. All actions that are contested,
where all of the parties are self-represented and the case is not assigned to the limited divorce
domestic track shall be assigned to the standard domestic pro se track.
(c) Track Three -- Standard Domestic Track. All actions that are contested, where at
least one of the parties is represented and the case is not assigned to the limited divorce domestic
track shall be assigned to the standard domestic track.
(d) Track Four -- Limited Divorce Track. All cases in w hich a limited divorce is
requested shall be assigned to this track.
Table 1.1 – Family Tracks Case Types and Outcomes
Track Case Subtypes Expected Case Duration and
Notes
Track 1
Expedited
All uncontested cases. 75 days
Track 2
Standard Pro
Se
1. Contested Divorce, with or
without custody and child support
2. Contested Child Support
3. Contested Child Access
4. Contested Adoption
5. Guardianship
Paternity
Track 3
Standard
1. Contested Divorce, with or
without custody and child support
2. Contested Child Support
3. Contested Child Access
4. Contested Adoption
5. Guardianship
Paternity
545 days
Track 4
Limited
Divorce
Limited Divorce 700 days
Table 1.2 – Family DCM Track Guidelines
Discovery
Family Case Answer Scheduling Settlement Motions Pretrial Merits
Track Types Tracks Filing Filed Conference Mediation Conference Filed Conference Hearing
One Expedited 0 days 30 days n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 75 days
Two Standard Pro Se 0 days 30 days n/a 60 days n/a n/a 180 days 210 days
Three Standard 0 days 30 days 60 days 120 days 180 days 210 days 240 days 270 days
Limited 0 days 30 days 60 days 120 days 210 days 575 days 690 days 725 days
Four Divorce
(c) Contested Custody/Visitation - ADR Programs.
(i) If all parties are self-represented, the Family Services Office shall arrange for
mediation. No Scheduling Conferences or Settlement Conferences are typically
conducted.
(ii) When any party is represented, a Scheduling Conference will be held. At the
Scheduling Conference, the Court shall determine which services are necessary.
The Court may direct the Family Services Office to arrange for one, or a
combination, of the following services: (i) custody evaluation by the court-appointed evaluator; (ii) home study by the Department of Social Services; (iii)
substance abuse evaluation by designated agency; (iv) psychological evaluation by
the court-appointed psychologist, or (v) any other program the court deems
necessary.
(iii) Regardless of the results of the mediation process, the mediator shall file a
written report with the Family Services Office when the process is completed but
no later than 30 days from the final mediation session.
(iv) If the parties reach agreement, the mediator shall submit that agreement to the
Court through the Family Services Office. If the written agreement is received and
found acceptable by the Court prior to the Settlement Conference, and all other
issues are resolved, the Court may proceed with an uncontested divorce on the date
of the Settlement Conference. If there are issues, other than custody and visitation,
the case shall proceed to a Settlement Conference, if appropriate..
(v) If the parties fail to reach an agreement through the initial ADR programs,
Track 2 cases shall proceed directly to trial. For Track 3 and 4 cases, a Pretrial
Settlement Conference will be scheduled before the magistrate pursuant to
paragraph 2.7 (b)
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
ffe7175bcffe5e6e735f7bb3be978e77ba2940a6abac17a3937d1b2ea9a24efd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.