MD · rules
Calvert Cnty. Cir. Ct. Criminal DCM Plan 1.1
Postponements
a. Policy. In order to minimize adverse impacts on witnesses, jurors, judicial resources
and other cases on the Court’s dockets, it is the policy of this Court that cases that remain on the
trial docket or in which a postponement has been denied are ready for trial and will be actually
tried on the trial date. It is the policy of the Calvert County Circuit Court to deny requests for
postponement unless “good cause” is given. It is the intent of this policy to minimize last-minute
dispositions or postponements that needlessly take up judicial resources that could be used for
other matters pending in this Court.
b. Requests. Unless the Court, in its sole discretion, shall determine otherwise, all motions
for postponement filed by the State’s Attorney and by defense counsel shall:
1. Be in writing and titled, Motion for Postponement;
2. Include a proposed Order;
3. Precisely state the “good cause” for seeking a postponement;
4. Clearly state the position of the opposing side as to the motion or demonstrate
attempts to contact the opposing side;
5. Include new date(s) for the court events, as provided by the criminal assignment
office, and agreed to by all parties or provide an explanation of attempts to obtain new
dates; and
6. Be filed with the Clerk’s Office. Verbal, telephone and fax request will only be
considered at the judge’s discretion, and must be followed by an original pleading.
c. Requests by Self-Represented Defendant. Unless the Court, in its sole discretion, shall
determine otherwise, all motions for postponement filed by a self-represented defendant shall:
1. Be in writing and titled, Motion for Postponement;
2. Set forth the “good cause” for seeking a postponement;
3. Include the position of the State’s Attorney as to the motion or provide an
explanation of attempts to contact the State’s Attorney;
4. Include new date(s) for the court events, as provided by the criminal assignment
office, and agreed to by all parties or demonstrate attempts to obtain new dates;
5. Include a certificate of service showing the date of mailing or delivery of a copy of
the motion to the State’s Attorney; and
6. Be filed with the Clerk’s Office. Verbal, telephone and fax request will only be
considered at the judge’s discretion, and must be followed by an original pleading.
d. Consideration. Pursuant to Md. Rule 4-271, all postponement requests must be
considered by the County Administrative Judge or his/her designee. The designated postponement
judge shall be authorized to make good cause findings and to rule on waivers of the Hicks
requirement. Pursuant to the Rule, only one judge may be designated to have postponement
authority at a time. Motions for postponement made on the same day of a scheduled court event
or during a court event should be in writing, when possible, and may be ruled on by the trial judge.
e. Clearing New Dates. Any party requesting a postponement of a trial or any other
hearing shall coordinate a proposed re-set date with the opposing party and the Court consistent
with Case Time Standards. Failure to coordinate a re-set date may result in the postponement not
being considered. Compliance with this procedure does not guarantee that any continuance will be
granted and will not be interpreted by the Court as constituting consent to the postponement.
f. Hicks issues. If the postponement of any event will, in any way, implicate the Hicks
Rule, a Hicks waiver or finding of good cause must be made in open court, by the designated
postponement judge. The Defendant shall be present in open court and written waivers will not be
accepted.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
2abb8f3e385a01a3b8d114e34ed0f263a10df079983d9d9467ef2bc8b96b41c5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.