MD · rules
Baltimore City Cir. Ct. Family DCM Plan 5
Public trust and confidence in the Family Division as an institution within the Judiciary
Consistent with the case time standards adopted by the Judicial Council, constitutional requirements and
applicable Maryland Rules, it is the goal of this DCM plan to ensure that ninety eight percent (98%) of
family cases are concluded within 12 months (365 days) of the filing date. A concluded disposition is
defined as conclusion by final judgment or dismissal. In order to achieve this goal, the Circuit Court is
committed to concluding its many categories of family cases within a regular and predictable time frame
warranted by the needs of those cases.
CASE MANAGEMENT
General Overview
The policies and procedures outlined in this plan shall be implemented by the Judge- in-Charge of the
Family Division (JICF) with assistance from Division A dministrative Staff, Clerk’s Office, Assignment
Office, Baltimore City Office of Child Support Services (BCOCSS), Office of the Attorney General –
Office of Special Counsel (OSC), and any other necessary parties.
Judges and Magistrates
The JICF reports to the Administrative Judge who is ultimately responsible for all aspects of case
management in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. With respect to the Family Division, the
1 At the time of approval of this DCM plan, an Electronic Filing and Case Management system has not yet been
implemented in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. The Court will revise this DCM plan upon implementation of
“MDEC” in Baltimore City, with implementation expected to occur in May 2024.
Administrative Judge will designate Judges to hear family cases and make final decisions about special
assignment of cases to particular Judges.
The JICF will designate courtroom and docket rotations for all Judge s assigned to the Family Division.
The JICF will also oversee the composition of family Magistrates’ dockets. From time-to-time, the JICF,
with the assistance of the Family Division Associate Administrator, will examine workloads and time
standard compliance associated with particular dockets and will adjust dockets accordingly.
All Family Judges and Magistrate s will be responsible for compliance with the Family Division DCM
Plan. Individual Judges and Magistrates are responsible for the efficient and effective management of the
cases assigned to them, including, but not limited to, timely disposition of cases, timely production of
necessary orders/decisions, reports and recommendations as well as timely decisions on motions filed with
the Family Clerk’s Office.
In addition to the matters to be referred to Family Magistrates as a matter of course pursuant to Md. Rule
9-208(a)(1), the Court may also assign the following matters to Family Magistrates for a hearing:
o Initial Temporary Protective Order hearings
o Hearings upon the filing of a request for an emergency evaluation
o Hearings associated with request for emergency or ex-parte relief
o Default custody hearings
o Default divorce hearings
o Establishment of Child Support and/or Paternity (BCOCSS/OSC cases only)
Clerk of the Court
The Clerk of the Court will designate assistant clerks to be assigned to the Family Division Clerk’s Office
(FCO). The employees of the FCO will oversee the processing of new cases, pleadings, motions, and
orders as well as requests for hearings and postponements associated with cases falling within the purview
of the Family Division.
The FCO currently uses the following numbering conventions for Family Division cases:2
• Each case is assigned a jurisdictional number (“24” for all cases file in or transferred to the Circuit
Court for Baltimore City – Family Division).
• Each case is then assigned a letter identifying the nature of the case:
o Child support and paternity actions filed by BCOCSS, through OSC and child support and
paternity actions not filed by the BCOCSS are assigned a “P” designation.
o Child support and paternity cases filed by the BCOCSS, through OS C pursuant to the
Maryland Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) are assigned a “U” designation.
o All guardianship petitions, whether for adults or minors and regardless of whether a
petition for a minor is filed in conjuncti on with a petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile
Status findings are assigned a “T” designation.
2 The Family Division’s numbering convention will change upon implementation of MDEC within the Circuit Court
for Baltimore City.
o All adoption petitions are assigned an “A” designation.
o All other Family Division cases are assigned a “D” designation. Cases with a D designation
include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following actions:
Custody actions – including custody actions filed in conjunction with a petition for
Special Immigrant Juvenile Status findings.
Divorce actions – contested and uncontested.
Name change petitions (adults and minors).
Petitions for protective orders including temporary protective order transfers from
District Courts pursuant to Rule 3- 326(c), protective order appeals from District
Courts pursuant to FL Section 4-507, and original filings in the Circuit Court.
Registration of out-of-state custody orders pursuant to FL Section 9.5-305.
• Each case is then assigned a number identifying the year in which the action was filed; and
• Each case is assigned a case number identifying the number associated with the initial filing (i.e.,
case number 24-D-23-000351 would represent the 351st “D” case filed with the FCO in 2023).
The FCO is responsible for the following tasks:
• Timely processing and docketing of all pleadings associated with Family Division cases.
• Establishment, maintenance, and overseeing of a “tickle” system that effectively tracks mandated
timelines, including, but not limited to, dismissals under Maryland Rule 2-507(b) and (c).
• Timely creation and transmittal of mandated notices.
• Effective tracking of case files.
• Effective, responsible, and service-oriented communication with all members of the public and
employees of the court.
• Oversight of compliance with caseflow standards.
• Direct scheduling of certain matters that do not require case management review.
Family Division Services
The Family Division offers the following services to those involved in a Family Division case.
Supervision/management of these services is conducted by the Family Division Associate Administrator
in conjunction with the JICF:
• Pro Se Assistance Office: Through the Self-Represented Litigant Project, the Court maintains an
office staffed by attorneys who assist self-represented individuals seeking to file or defend any action
filed within the Family Division. The attorneys provide basic legal advice and assist with completion
of form pleadings to be filed at the FCO. The unit is located in Room 114 of the Cummings
Courthouse. The attorneys meet with litigants each workday from 9:00 a.m. – 1:00 and from 2:00 –
4:00. At this time, the Pro Se Office does not provide advice by telephone, email or other remote
means. Appointments are made on the day of service only, except for individuals requiring an
interpreter whereby appointments will b e made based upon the availability of one’s particular
language needs. Those interested in the assistance of the Pro Se Assistance Office shall use the sign-up sheet at the Sheriff’s station in front of the Family courtrooms. Sign-up begins at 8:30 a.m. for the
morning session and at 1:00 p.m. for the afternoon session. The last sign-in time is at 3:30 p.m. (or at
the time the afternoon session is full).
• Parenting Education: Parenting education is offered through an online parenting course. Orders
requiring participation will be issued and information mailed to the parties. When a party logs in, a
fee of $25.00 will be collected. If a party is unable to pay the fee, he/she may file a petition for a fee
waiver. If granted, a special code will be provided to the party that is valid for a limited time. Once
a party completes the parenting education course, he/she shall print the certificate of completion and
file it with the FCO.
• Mediation: In many custody and vi sitation cases, the Court will mandate that the parties participate
in mediation to be conducted by a team of mediators contracted by the Court. 3 At this time, all
mediation sessions occur remotely, however the Court reserves the right to have parties participate in
person with the assigned mediator(s) if necessary. The cost of mediation sessions is currently covered
by the Family grant.
• Custody and visitation related assessment (including home studies): Pursuant to Md. Rule 9-
205.3, the Court, on its own initiative or at the request of a party, may request that a custody evaluation
be performed in any custody action. Unless otherwise ordered, those evaluations, along with optional
elements as described in Rule 9- 205.3(f)(2) and specific issue evaluations described in Md. R ule 9 -
205.3(f)(3) shall be performed by the staff of the Circuit Court’s Medical Services Division.4
• Substance Abuse Evaluation/Random Drug Testing: The Court, upon recommendation of a Family
Magistrate, the Family Associate Administrator, or on its own initiative, may recommend an order for
parties in a family action to participate in a substance abuse evaluation and substance abuse testing.
Assessment shall be conducted by the Court’s Addictions Assessment Unit located in the Mitchell
Courthouse. Testing will be conducted by private vendors chosen by the parties. All evaluations and
testing orders will be monitored by the Family Division’s Family Services Coordinator.
• Supervised Visitation /Monitored Exchange (domestic violence cases): The Baltimore City
Visitation Center (BCVC) offers supervised visitation and monitored exchanges for families who have
experienced intimate partner violence or cases involving child sexual abuse. The violence need not
be documented in a protective order. The Court may refer parties for supervised visitation or
monitored exchange upon hearing testimony about the violence or abuse and will issue an order
explaining in detail the alleged history of the violence or abuse. This order, along with a completed
referral form, will be sent to BCVC and the parties will be contacted to set up a visitation/monitored
exchange schedule. There is no limit to the number of visitation sessions or the number of monitored
exchanges that may occur.
3 Generally, the Court will not order mediation in cases where there has been a history of intimate partner violence.
4 Currently, the Court Medical Division fee for a custody evaluation is $770 per party (including children) and $275
for a home study per residence. Cost for home studies and evaluations for both parties is $ 1540. There may be a
fee assessed if a party does not keep an appointment. Fees must be paid before a report will be issued. The Court
may apportion fees between the parties as it deems appropriate. Parties may seek a fee waiver through proper motion
filed with the Court. The Court reserves the right to change its fee schedule without amendment to this DCM plan.
Currently fees for services rendered by outside contractual evaluators may be covered under the Family grant.
• Children’s Waiting Room: Families who bring children to the courthouse for a Family Division
hearing may use the Children’s Waiting Room (CWR) located in Room 108 of the Cummings
Courthouse, inside the Family Division Administration suite. The CWR is open during court hours
(8:30-12:30 and 1:30 – 4:30) and is supervised by Family Administration staff. Caretakers must fill
out a short form with information indicating who is permitted to pick up the child. The CWR is also
used as a safe place if there is a hearing resulting in a contentious change in custody. Details regarding
this service can be obtained from the Family Division Administration Office. There is no fee for this
service.
• Other Services: The Family Services Coordinator provides parties with information and referrals to
various services of value to Family Division litigants including services involving domestic violence
intervention, anger management, substance abuse and addiction, and mental health to name a few.
While the Court does not offer these services “in-house” it strives to make information about such
services available to those in need who have a pending case with the Family Division.
TRACK DESIGNATIONS/TIME STANDARDS
Definitions
Tracks define expected case processing events, the timing of events, assignment, and the expectations for
case duration. The caseflow time standard for Circuit Court family cases is 12 months (365 days) for 98%
of cases, but expected duration is based on needed time to r each resolution, which may be less than the
time standard.
A Family case may follow one of four (4) potential tracks to resolution. Tracks are defined at filing, at
time of review by case manager or at scheduling conference, depending on type of case, issues, and status.
• Track 1: Expedited cases/requests (Expected adjudication – 60 days or less):
o Protective Order Petitions filed in the Circuit Court: All petitions for protective orders
originally filed in the Circuit Court pursuant to Family Law Article Title 4, Subtitle 5 shall have a
Temporary Protective Order (TPO) hearing conducted on the day of filing. If a TPO is granted,
the Court shall schedule the initial Final Protective Order (FPO) hearing within seven days. FPO
hearings are typically scheduled for 9:00 a.m. Subsequent extensions of TPOs due to a failure to
serve the respondent, or for other good cause may be scheduled at intervals to be determined by
the Court.
Those seeking to file a petition for protection will meet with the Court’s Family Services
Coordinator who will assist the petitioner in completing necessary paperwork, obtain a Family
Division case number, initiate case number and enter information about the parties into the court’s
case management system, and arrange for a TPO hearing before a Judge or F amily Magistrate.
The Family Services Coordinator will also assist petitioners in filing waivers of appearance and
signing up for VINE notifications of service upon the Respondent.
o Protective Order Appeals and Protective Order Transfers from the District Court: If a
District Court issue s a TPO or FPO and subsequently transfers the case to the Circuit Court
pursuant to Md. Rule 3-326(c), the initial FPO in Circuit Court will typically be scheduled within
seven days of the last District Court TPO. Those hearings are scheduled for 9:00 a.m. Subsequent
extensions of TPOs due to a fai lure to serve the respondent or for other good cause may be
scheduled at intervals to be determined by the Court.
Appeals from the grant/denial of a TPO or FPO at the District Court level will be scheduled for
trial within forty-five days of the date the notice of appeal is issued by the FCO.
o Protective Order Motions: Motions to terminate or modify an existing FPO will be scheduled
in due course, but no later than 45 days from the date of filing. If a protective order will expire
before a hearing can be scheduled, the Court will issue an interim order to bridge the gap between
the expiration and hearing date. Motions to extend protective orders will be scheduled in the same
manner with due consideration to the requirements of Family Law §4-507(a)(4).
o Requests for Emergency /Expedited Relief: Motions for emergency relief must be filed in
writing. No temporary order for emergency will be granted unless a pleading for permanent relief
has been filed at the same time, or prior to, the emergency motion. The Court will require proper
service of the motion upon opposing parties, at least 24 hours prior to the filing of the motion.
Such motions will not be considered on an expedited basis unless coupled with a request to shorten
time pursuant to Md. Rule 1-204. Upon receipt of such a motion, the FCO shall promptly deliver
the motion and file to a Family Magistrate for review. The Family Magistrate will recommend to
the Court whether the request should be granted or denied on the papers or whether a hearing of
the requested relief should be conducted. Such hearings will be scheduled as soon as practicable
in accordance with Judge availability. In determining whether a request for emergency relief will
be granted, the Court will determine if there is a sufficient showing that there is an imminent risk
of substantial and immediate harm to a party or a minor or that that there are circumstances which
the Court finds require immediate intervention.
o Requests for Ex Parte Relief: Motions for ex parte relief must be filed in accordance with Md.
Rule 1-351. Although the R u le does not specify a time limit, the Court requires the opposing
parties be provided with 24 hours advance notice of motions for ex parte relief. As with other
requests for emergency relief, the FCO shall promptly deliver the motion and file to a Family
Magistrate for review. The Family Magistrate will promptly recommend to the Court whether the
request should be granted or denied on the papers or whether a hearing of the requested relief
should be conducted. Such hearings will be scheduled as soon as practicable in accordance with
Judge availability. In determining whether a request for emergency relief will be gra nted, the
Court will determine if there is a sufficient showing that there is an imminent risk of substantial
and immediate harm to a party or a minor or that there are circumstances which the Court finds
require immediate intervention.
o SIJS Motions filed within 6 months of the minor’s 21 st birthday: Counsel who fil e custody
actions or guardianship petitions in conjunction with a motion for SIJS findings shall immediately
contact the Family Division Administrator (410-396-3648) and inform of such a filing if the filing
is made within six months of the child’s 21st birthday. Despite the fact that these SIJS motion will
be on an expedited track, counsel must abide by all procedural rules for service and notice. The
Court will entertain motions for alternative service only if properly filed with the FCO. Should all
service and notice be accomplished, the Court will schedule a hearing before the minor’s 21 st
birthday.
o Exceptions filed pursuant to Md. Rule 9-208(f): Exception petitions shall be promptly referred
to the Family Division Administration office for review for compliance with Md. Rules 9-208(f)
and (g). Should the exce pting party fail to comply with these rules, the Court will promptly
dismiss/deny the exceptions. Should the moving party comply with these rules, the Family
Division Administration office will request the FCO to schedule an exceptions hearing before a
Judge within 60 days of the filing. See Md. Rule 9-208(i)(2).
o Immediate Orders Pursuant to Md. Rule 9-208(h)(2): After conducting a hearing, should a
Magistrate find that extraordinary circumstances exist, the Magistrate may recommend that a
Judge issue an immediate order upon a Magistrate’s report and recommendation. Before doing
so, the Court will schedule a hearing to afford the parties an opportunity for oral argument. Such
hearings shall be scheduled as soon as practicable.
o Adult Guardianship Hearings: All petitions for adult guardianships (property, person or both)
are reviewed by the Court’s guardianship attorney for compliance with Title 10 of the Maryland
Rules. No hearings will be scheduled in such cases unless compliance with the rul es has occurred.
Assuming there is compliance with Title 10, hearings associated with the filing of a petition that
includes a request for appointment of a guardian of person of an adult will be conducted on an
expedited basis ONLY upon the request of the petitioner by written motion. Such requests will be
considered in connection with the need for immediate medical treatment, regarding discharge from
a medical facility, or if some other exigent circumstances allegedly exist. A hearing will be
conducted as soon as practicable, but no later than three weeks after review. Should a petition be
deemed non-exigent, a hearing will generally be conducted within 6 to 7 weeks of review. Adult
guardianship hearings are scheduled on the Court’s “fast track” docket and will be conducted by a
Judge assigned to that docket on any given week (i.e., not a Judge assigned full time to the Family
Division).
• Guardianship of property (only) of a minor: If a petition for guardianship of the property of a
minor is filed without a request for a guardianship of the person, those petitions will be processed
and adjudicated in a similar fashion to adult guardianship. Petitions for guardianship of the person
and property of a minor will be considered a “short track” matter (see below).
• Petitions to shield family case files from public inspection: Shielding petitions must comply
with Md. Rule 16-934. The FCO shall grant temporary relief in accordance with Md. Rule 16-
934(c) and shall promptly submit the petition and file to a Family Division Judge f or review. The
Court may grant temporary relief without a hearing. Should temporary relief be granted, it shall
remain effective within the time standards set forth in Md. Rule 15-504(c). The Court will schedule
a final hearing within the time set forth in Md. Rule 15-504(c). A final hearing will be conducted
in accordance with Md. Rule 16-934(e). Should temporary relief be denied, the Court will schedule
a final hearing within 30 days of the date of denial.
• Notice of Intent to Relocate: Pursuant to Family Law Article 9-106, a petitioner filing a petition
for intent to relocate will be held on an expedited basis.
o Track 2: Short Track Cases (Expected adjudication: 61 to 150 days)
o Uncontested Divorce Proceedings: The FCO shall promptly present such filings to the Family
Division Administrator for review at such time as an answer has been filed. Should the Family
Division Administrator deem the case is ripe for adjudication, such cases shall be scheduled for a
hearing before a Family Magistrate to occur within 60 days of review.5
o Default Divorce Proceedings without request for alimony or property disposition: Consistent
with Md. Rule 2-613(b), upon the gr anting of an order of default, the issuance of a notice, the
failure of defendant to file timely motion to vacate, or the denial of such a motion, the FCO shall
promptly present default divorce matters to the Family Division Administrator for review. Should
it be deemed that such cases are ripe for adjudication, such cases shall be scheduled for a hearing
before a Family Magistrate within 60 days of review.
o Child Support/Paternity Establishment Actions filed by BCOCSS/OSC: The FCO will
schedule an initial trial date in these cases to occur within 90 days of the filing of the complaint.
This shall include all establishment actions filed pursuant to UIFSA. Such matters may be assigned
to either a Family Judge or Magistrate for adjudication. Cases may be continued for purposes of
effectuating service upon the defendant.
o Child Support/Paternity Establishment (private parties): Parties who pursue child support
action (absent a request for custody) or paternity actions and do so without the assistance of
BCOCSS/OSC will be responsible for filing fees and service of process upon the defendant. Such
cases will be set for hearing before a Judge after service and the filing of an answer. If service is
effectuated, but no answer is filed, plaintiff will be responsible for seeking an order of default in
order to have the matter scheduled for a hearing.
o Child Support Modification Petitions: Petitions to modify child support filed by BCOSS/OSC
will be scheduled for trial approximately 90 days after filing. Hearings may be continued until
such time that service is effectuated upon the opposing party.
Parties who pursue child support modifications without the assistance of BCOCSS/OSC will be
responsible for filing fees and service of process upon the defendant. Such cases will be set for
hearing before a Family Magistrate after service and the filing of an answer. If service is
effectuated, but no answer is filed, the moving party will be responsible for seekin g an order of
default in order to have the matter scheduled for a hearing.
5 It is the expectation of the Court that such files shall be reviewed by the Family Division Administrator’s Office
within two weeks of receipt from the Family Clerk’s Office.
• Child Support Contempt Proceedings Filed by BCOCSS/OSC: The FCO will schedule an
initial trial date for child support contempt proceedings within 90 days of the filing of a contempt
petition, regardless of whether service of a show cause order has been effectuated. Most often,
such matters will initially be heard by a Family Magistrate pursuant to Md. Rule 9-208 but may be
referred to a Judge for a de novo hearing pursuant to Md. Rule 9-208(d).
• Name Change P etitions: Name change petitions filed on behalf of minors shall be promptly
reviewed by the Family Administrator or a Family Division Judge or Magistrate. Should a name
change petition fail to comply with Md. Rule 15-901, the Court will issue an order pointing out
the deficiencies in the petition and requiring the petitioner to file an amended petition. Failure to
comply with the Court’s deficiency order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of the
petition. Should a name change petition comply with Md. Rule 15-901, absent all necessary
consents, the FCO will issue a notice to be served upon the minor’s non-consenting
parent(s)/guardian(s) or custodian(s). After proper service and proof thereof, once all consents are
filed – or the time to do has expired -- the Court may issue an order granting the petition without
the need for a hearing. Should a name change petition fully comply with Md. Rule 15-901 at the
time of filing, (i.e., all necessary consents and paperwork are filed), the Court may issue an order
granting the petition without a hearing. Should the Court deem a hearing be necessary, t he FCO
shall schedule a hearing to occur within 90 days of review by the Court.
Adult name change petitions will be promptly reviewed by a general equity Magistrate for
compliance with Md. Rule 15-901 and will be handled in a manner similar to name changes for
minors, save the need for consents. Should the petition comply with Md. Rule 15-901, the Court
may issue an order granting the petition without a hearing, or alternatively grant/deny the petition
after a hearing.
o Gender Declaration Petitions: Such petitions will generally be reviewed/adjudicated in a manner
consistent with name change petitions. Gender declaration petitions must comply with Md. Rule
15-902 be fore adjudication can occur. If a gender declaration petition (adult or minor) fails to
comply with Md. Rule15-902, the Court most often will issue an order pointing out the deficiencies
and provide the petitioner 45 days to file an amended petition. Failure to comply with the Court’s
deficiency order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of the petition. Petitio ns filed on
behalf of minors must be served upon the minor’s parent(s) guardian(s) or custodian(s) before the
Court can rule on a petition. Hearings will generally be conducted in cases filed on behalf of
minors where a parent, guardian, or custodian has filed properly executed objection to the proposed
name change. See Md. Rule 15-902(d). Should the Court deem a hearing to be necessary, the
FCO will schedule the hearing to occur within 90 days of review by the Court.
o Pendente Lite Petitions: Pendente lite petitions are typically set in for a hearing after a F amily
Magistrate conducts a scheduling conference and determines that there is a need for a pendente
lite hearing. Pendente lite hearings are generally set to occur within 90 days after the Scheduling
Conference to consider temporary relief until the trial on the merits will be heard.
o Contempt Proceedings other than those filed by BCOCSS/OSC: Contempt petitions filed by
a party will be promptly forwarded by the FCO to a Family Magistrate for review. Should the
Family Magistrate determine that the petition is not frivolous on its face, the Court shall issue a
pre-hearing conference order at which both parties shall participate. After the pre-hearing
conference, the Family Magistrate will recommend whether the Court shall issue a Show Cause
Order for service upon the alleged contemnor. If this occurs, a contempt hearing will be scheduled
before a Family Magistrate approximately 45 days after the issuance of the show cause order.
• Guardianship of Minor (person) petitions: Petitions for guardianship of a minor (person) will
be promptly reviewed by the Family Administrator, or a Family Division Judge/ Magistrate.
Should the petition fail to comply with the requirements of Md. Rule 10-111, the Court will issue
an order pointing out the deficiencies in the petition and requiring the petitioner to file an amended
petition. Failure to comply with the Court’s deficiency order in a timely manner may result in the
dismissal of the petition. Should the petition comply with Md. Rule 10-111, the Court will issue
an order setting for the hearing date and requiring the petitioner to serve show cause orders and
notices to interested persons within the time proscribed in the order. Petit ioners are required to
file proof of service with the FCO. Failure to properly serve interested persons in a timely manner
may result in a postponement of the guardianship hearing.
• SIJS cases where child will reach age 21 more than 6 months from filing: Custody or
guardianship petitions, which include a r equest to establish Special Immigration Juvenile Status,
will be processed in the normal course and forwarded to the Case Manager upon filing of original
Answer or Consent from all defendants, or after expiration of time to bring a Motion to Vacate
when a Default has been granted. The Case Manager will review all documents in file and verify
that a birth certificate for the juvenile has been filed and verify the birth date of the juvenile in
order to ascertain when the juvenile’s 21st birthday will occur. Every attempt will be made to set
the case for hearing in advance of a juvenile’s 21st birthday.
• UIFSA petitions: UIFSA cases are instituted by the States Attorney Office and scheduled for
hearing by the F CO after service of a show cause order on the d efendant. UIFSA cases are
designated Track 2 (Sub Track A or B) and retain that designation whether the pending case is an
establishment or a modification.
• Track 3: Standard Track Cases (Expected adjudication: 151 to 271 days (5 to 9 months)
o Custody actions (establishment/modification with or without child support claims): Custody
establishment or modification hearings will be set in due course. Cases in which the opposing
party has filed an answer and/or counter complaint will be reviewed by the Family Administrator
to determine if the case is ripe for a hearing. Parties may be sent to mediation and/or parenting
seminars if the parties are deemed to benefit from such services.
o Divorce actions that do not involve considerable alimony or property claims (with or without
custody disputes).
o Adoption Proceedings: Files associated with adoption proceedings shall be kept confidential by
the FCO. New petitions will be promptly reviewed by the Family Administrator or a Family
Division Judge/Magistrate. Should the petition fail to comply with the requirements of Md. Rule
9-101 et seq., and Family Law Article 5-3, 5-3A and 5-3B, the Court will issue an order pointing
out the deficiencies in the petition and requiring the petitioner to file an amended petition.
Adoptions arising under Family Law Article 5-3B-27 will be approved without a hearing, but may
be set for a hearing in the discretion of the assigned Judge. The Court will conduct all other
adoption he arings in a prompt manner. Adequate hearing time will be allotted for contested
adoptions.
• Track 4: Complex Track Cases (Expected adjudication: less than 365 days)
o Divorce cases involving alimony claims, considerable p roperty, and/or business valuations
(with or without custody disputes).
o Any other matter to be determined in the discretion of the Court.
Additional Case Track Information
Upon filing of an Answer or expiration of time to vacate an order of default ( qualifying events), all D
cases and modifications of child support in P cases filed by individuals, will be sent to the Family Division
case manager. The case manager will review all filings for legal and procedural sufficiency and as
appropriate, request that cases be assigned to a Magistrate for Scheduling Conference, or set before a IV-D Magistrate (P cases only). IV-D Magistrate (P cases only) will skip case manager review and are set in
by FCO.
At the Scheduling Conference, Magistrates will request that cases be assigned to Track 2, 3 or 4, based on
their observation of the complexity of the issues in the case, levels of conflict, and need for services.
Disputes Regarding Track Assignment
Attorneys or pro se litigants may request a different track designation. All such requests must be in
writing, contain a detailed explanation of the necessity for reassignment, and must be filed, by motion,
within fifteen (15) days of the initial track assignment or reassignment.
IMPORTANT POLICIES
Postponements and Rescheduling
General Policies
It is the general policy of the Family Division that cases will be heard as scheduled. However, due
consideration will be given to requests to change a trial or hearing date.
• If the need for a postponement arises more than 30 days from the scheduled trial/hearing date, the
moving party must file a postponement request with the FCO at least 30 days before the scheduled
hearing. Such requests will be reviewed by the JICF or his/her designee and may be granted on the
papers or may be set for a postponement hearing. G enerally, postponements will be granted based
upon whether the moving party has established good cause for a change in trial date.
• If the need for a postponement arises within 30 days of the scheduled trial/hearing date, the moving
party shall contact the FCO assignment office (410-209-6366) to schedule a postponement hearing
before a Family Division Judge. The FCO assignment office will provide the moving party with the
date/time of the postponement hearing. The moving party shall be responsible for contacting the
other party (or counsel) with the date/time of postponement hearing. Postponements sought within
30 days of a trial/hearing date will generally be considered in the event of “ exigent circumstances” -
an unforeseen development occurring within 30 days of the date for which postponement is sought.
• All postponement hearings shall be conducted on the record, via remote participation of the
parties/counsel using a designated conference call number. Postponement hea rings are gen erally
conducted at 4:00 p.m. each weekday, unless logistics/schedules dictate otherwise. Postponement will
be granted or denied in the discretion of the Postponement Judge, and in accordance with Md. Rule 2-
508 w ith due consider ation of the timeline of the track to which the case has been assigned and good
cause shown.
PROCEDURES SPECIFIC TO CASES FILED WITHIN THE FAMILY DIVISION
The following are major events for Family Division cases.
Case Filing
Each original complaint/petition must list a name and address for Plaintiff and Defendant and must
be a signed original. Consistent with Md. Rule 2-111, each new Complaint or Petition must be
accompanied by a Domestic Case Information Report (CC-DCM-001). Case types exempt from filing
the Information Report include:
• Contempt for failure to pay child support, when filed by a government agency,
• Requests for relief from Domestic Violence under Family Law Article §4-501, et seq.,
• Guardianship,
• Paternity when filed by government agency.
Cases reopened for modification must retain the original listed plaintiff and defendant, regardless
of who is filing the modification action. Updated addresses must be provided for each party.
Cases are filed at the Family Clerk’s Office in R oom 109. All fees are due when paperwork is
filed.
After a case is opened or reopened, the Family Clerk’s Office will issue a writ of summons. A
Summons is notice to the non-filing party that there is a matter now pending before the court involving
them.
Summons and Complaint/Petition must be served on the responding party or their attorney if
they are represented. A Summons is valid for 60 days from the date it is issued.
Requests to reissue Summons es after expiration of 60 days must be submitted in writing at the
Family Clerk’s Office.
Failure to serve the other party within 120 days may result in dismissal of the case pursuant to
Rule 2-507(b).
Parties who wish to have an opposing party served by the Sheriff’s Office may do so and submit
$60.00 check or money order to the Family Clerk’s Office.
(P) Paternity and (U) UIFSA cases are initiated by a governmental agency and are managed by
specialized personnel within the Family Clerk’s office.
Answer/Response
If a responding party wants the Court to consider their point of view, the party must file a response to the
Complaint that has been served on them. Most often that response is called an Answer, and the deadlines
for filing a response are:
• within 30 days if the defendant was served in Maryland,
• within 60 days if the defendant was served within the United States, but outside of Maryland, or
• within 90 days if the defendant was served in a foreign country.
The Answer must follow the requirements of Md. Rule 2-323, including the necessity of filing a Case
Information Sheet per Md. Rule 2-323(h).
If a Counter Complaint is filed. A responding party may also file a Counter Complaint at the same time
an Answer is filed or within 30 days of the date the Answer is filed, if the responding party wants the court
to address issues not presented by the initiating party. Counter Complaints must be accompanied by a
Case Information Sheet and must contain a completed certificate of service.
When filing an Answer to Counter Complaint, the original initiating party does not need to file another
Case Information Sheet.
Default
If a Complaint has been properly served, the appropriate amount of time has elapsed, and the responding
party has not filed an Answer, the initiating party may file a Request for Default.
Requests for Default must include a Non-Military Affidavit. The Non-Military Affidavit must be signed
by the initiating party (not an attorney) and must provide specifics regarding their personal knowledge of
the responding parties’ present status with respect to military service or provide a copy of a Status Report
Pursuant to Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that reflects the party is not on active duty.
Requests for default are forwarded to the Family Division Admi nistration office. After review for
completeness, the case file is sent to the motions Judge for review to grant or deny the Request. Upon
granting of default, the FCO will immediately send out a Notice to the responding party that the responding
party is in default and has 30 days to file a Motion to Vacate.
File Review by Case Manager
Upon the occurrence of a qualifying event, the FCO will transfer files to the Family Division C ase
Manager for review and assignment to a Track. Qualifying events include:
• The filing of an Answer to a Complaint or Petition, including Petitions to Modify in (P)
cases;
• The filing of a responsive motion pursuant to Md. Rule 2-322, or
• The entry of an Order of Default (30 days after Notice sent).
After reviewing a file, the case manager will assign the case to the appropriate Track, request a scheduling
conference before a Magistrate, or request a hearing. The case manager shall, in turn, make t hose
designations known to the Assignment Clerk. The Assignment Clerk will set hearings on the dockets of
Judges or Magistrates, as appropriate, based on track assignment and referral from case manager.
The case manager will put a checklist in the file reflecting that the file has been reviewed, the status of the
case, the track assignment, and indicating if parties sent to parenting education and/or mediation, if
appropriate.
Referrals for Services (Before Scheduling Conference)
Per Md. Rules 9-204 and 9-205 parties may be ordered to attend a parenting education seminar and
custody/visitation mediation prior to the Scheduling Conference. Parties may attend the parenting seminar
and engage in mediation at any time prior to trial on the merits, though parties are urged to comply
immediately.
Mediation will not be ordered if a party represents that there exists a genuine issue of physical or sexual
abuse of a party or child who is the subject of litigation, and that mediation would therefore be
inappropriate.
Scheduling Conference
(D) cases determined to not be Track 1 shall be set for Scheduling Conference before a Family Magistrate
and in accordance with Md. Rule 2-504.1. At Scheduling Conference, the Magistrate will assist the parties
with settlement negotiation if appropriate, access the need for and order specific services, and designate
the cases to the appropriate Track.
Based on the track designation, the Family Magistrate shall produce a Scheduling Order consistent with
Md. Rule 2-504, which will include deadlines for discovery, dates for major events, and/or hearing dates
set within the parameters of the designated T rack. If not previously addressed by the C ourt, the Family
Magistrate may recommend the parties’ participation in parenting education seminars and incorporate
such recommendation into the proposed Scheduling Order. Further, the Family Magistrate may make a
recommendation to the court as to whether a custody evaluation and/or home study is warranted in a
particular case. (See Md. Rule 9-205.3)
A Scheduling Order will be forwarded to the JICF or his/her designee for review and approval. Milestones
generally included within in a Scheduling Order include:
• Date of a Pendente Lite hearing (Track 2),
• Date of a settlement conference (some Track 2 cases, Track 3 and Track 4),
• Date of a pretrial conference (generally only in Track 4 cases),
• Date of trial (all tracks).
The Family Magistrate who conducts the Scheduling C onference may also refer parties for appropriate
services. In addition to mediation and parenting education, the Family Magistrate may recommend and/or
a Judge may order the appointment of counsel for a minor child, a custody evaluation, a home study, a
substance abuse evaluation, a referral for random drug testing, a referral for counse ling, a referral for
supervised visitation or any other service or program dictated by the parties’ circumstances. In addition
to the Scheduling Order, orders for referral to specific services and programs along with completed referral
sheets will be prepared as appropriate and forwarded to the individual providers of said services.
Pendente Lite Hearings
At Scheduling Conference, a Family Magistrate may set a Pendente Lite hearing if there are emergent
issues that require resolution prior to trial on the merits. Examples of emergency issues include:
• Temporary child support,
• Temporary alimony,
• Temporary custody,
• Temporary use and possession of property.
Court Ordered Settlement Conferences
All Family Division cases scheduled for a full day of trial will be scheduled for a Settlement Conference
to be conducted by a Family Magistrate and to occur 30 to 60 days before trial. Settlement Conferences
will generally be conducted via remote participation with instructions to be provided by the assigned
Family Magistrate.
The conferences are generally allotted 1-1/2 hours on designated days before a Family Magistrate. In
most cases, if a s ettlement is reached, the terms and conditions of the settlement will be placed on the
record by the Family Magistrate, and parties may not be required to appear for any further hearings. For
cases that do not settle at the conference, if the Family Magistrate deems it appropriate, the Family
Magistrate may set the case for a second settlement conference.
Pre-Trial Conferences
Track 4 will be scheduled for a Pre-Trial Conference to be conducted in accordance with Md. Rule 2-
504.2. Pre-tr ial co nferences will be scheduled approximately 30 days prior to t rial before the
Judge/Magistrate scheduled to conduct the trial. Based upon results of the conference, the Court will issue
a pre-trial order pursuant to Md. Rule 2-504.2(c).
Trial on the Merits
At the Trial on the Merits, a Judge or Magistrate (depending on the nature of the case) will make a final
decision about all issues in the case. Decisions by Family Magistrates are subject to filing of Exceptions
per Md. Rule 9-208(f).
FILING FEES
The schedule of filing fees is as follows:
• Filing fee is $165.00,
• Attorney appearance fee is $20.00,
• Fee to reopen case is $31.00,
• Sheriff service fee is $60.00.
• Pursuant to Md. Rule 1-325(d), the Clerk may waive the prepayment of costs if the filer is
represented by an attorney retained through a pro bono or legal services program on a list submitted
by the Maryland Legal Services Corporation. Counsel representing a litigant pro bono shall be
responsible for filing a line.
• Pursuant to Md. Rule 1-325(e), prepayment of court costs may be waived by the court due to
indigency. To do so, a filer must fully complete Maryland Court form Request for Waiver of
Prepaid Costs and submit same to the FCO. The Family Division Administration Office will review
the submission and forward to a Family Division Judge for final determination (approval or denial).
• Pursuant to Md Rule 1-325(f), the court waive final costs to either party, due to indigency. To do
so, a filer must fully complete Maryland Court form Request for Final Waiver of Open Costs and
submit same to the FCO. The Family Division Administration Office will review the submission
and forward to a Family Division Judge for final determination (approval or denial).
• NOTE: The Court does not have authority to waive the Sheriff’s service fees.
There are no fees to file a petition for protective order, a modification of an existing protective order, or a
petition for contempt of a protective order.
FAMILY SERVICES FILING FEES
If a party is ordered to participate in any family services ( i.e., custody evaluation, parenting education,
etc.) and is unable to afford the fee(s), the party may file a Motion for Waiver of Family Services Fees
and Supporting Affidavit, which will be reviewed by the Family Division Associate Administrator and
forwarded to the motions Judge for final determination.
APPENDIX 1
PLAINTIFF * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant * FOR BALTIMORE CITY
vs. * (Family/Paternity Division)
DEFENDANT * Case Number: 24-D-
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff * Hearing Date:
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
SCHEDULING ORDER
On ___________ the parties in the above captioned matter appeared in the Circuit Court for
Baltimore City before a Family Magistrate of this Court for purposes of conducting a Scheduling
Conference pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-504.1. Both parties appeared (with/without counsel).
Among the matters at issue in the case is decision making authority for the parties’
child/children (“legal custody”) and/or the amount of time the child/children will spend with each
parent (“physical custody”). Pursuant to Maryland Rule 9-204.1(b), the Family Magistrate has
provided the parties with a paper copy of the Maryland Parenting Plan Instructions and Maryland
Parenting Plan Tool. The purpose of providing the parties with the Maryland Parenting Plan
Instructions and Maryland Parenting Plan Tool is to assist them in developing a Comprehensive
Parenting Plan for their children.
The Family Magistrate has directed the parties to the electronic versions of these
documents, and advised them that they may work separately, together or with a mediator to
develop a comprehensive parenting plan they believe is in the best interest of their child/children
Pursuant to the information provided by the parties at the Scheduling Conference, and upon
the recommendations of the Family Magistrate, pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-504, it is this ______
day of ______________ 20xx, by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, hereby
DISCOVERY/MOTION DEADLINES:
__X__ 1. ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Expert Reports and Md. Rule 2-402(g)(1)(A)
Disclosures shall be filed by _____________; and it is further
__X__ 2. ORDERED, that Defendant’s Expert Reports and Md. Rule 2-402(g)(1)(A)
Disclosures shall be filed by _____________; and it is further
__X__ 3. ORDERED, that all Discovery, except updates, shall be concluded no later than
______; and it is further
__X__ 4. ORDERED, that all Motions (excluding Motions in Limine) shall be filed no later
than 15 days after the date by which all Discovery must be completed; and it is further
__X__ 5. ORDERED, that by __________ pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-504.3, notice shall
be filed concerning computer-generated evidence; and it is further
__X__ 6. ORDERED, that by__ _________ any additional parties must be joined; and it is
further
__X__ 7. ORDERED, that by ___ _________ amendments to the pleadings are allowed as
of right; and it is further
EDUCATIONAL SEMINARS:
__X__ 8. ORDERED, that the parties shall attend the Co-Parenting Education Seminar
(“COPE”) per administrative order / as previously ordered; and it is further
__X__ 9. ORDERED, that the child(ren) shall attend the Children’s Group per administrative
order /as previously ordered; and it is further
__X 10. ORDERED, that the parties shall attend the Shared Parenting Education Seminar
(“SHAPE”) per administrative order / as previously ordered; and it is further
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION:
__X 11. ORDERED, that the parties shall attend Mediation on the issues of custody and
visitation pursuant to the (attached) Order for Mediation of Custody/Visitation Issues dated
________; and it is further
__X 12. ORDERED, that the parties and their attorneys, if they are represented, shall attend
a Court-Ordered Settlement Conference on ______, 20xx at _____a.m. Settlement Conference
shall be held remotely via Zoom for Government. The information for Settlement Conference shall
be sent via email or U.S. mail; and it is further
ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
__X 13. ORDERED, that an attorney is appointed to represent the child(ren) per the attached
order;
__X 14. ORDERED, that the parties are to undergo a custody and visitation related
assessment to be performed by the Court’s Medical Services Office (see attached order); and it is
further
__X 15. ORDERED, that __________________are referred to the Family Services
Coordinator (see attached order); and it is further
__X_ 16. ORDERED, that______________are referred to the following program (see
attached order) regarding the children: Supervised Visitation;
MAGISTRATE’S MODIFICATION / PENDENTE LITE HEARING:
__X__ 17. ORDERED, that the issues of [modification of]:
__X__ a. Child Support;
__X__ b. Alimony;
__X__ c. Custody;
__X__ d. Visitation;
__X__ e. Use and Possession;
__X__ f. Initial Counsel Fees;
__X__ g. Contempt;
__X__ h. Genetic Test Results
__X__ i. Other:
shall be heard before this Court on ___________________ at ______ a.m./p.m.. in Courtroom
_____before Magistrate________ . The hearing shall be limited in time to _______ hours/days;
and it is further
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE:
__X__ 18. ORDERED, that there shall be a Pre-trial Conference before this Court on,
20xx at a.m./p.m. in Courtroom F- _ before the Honorable _____________. The Pre-trial Conference shall be held before a Judge or other designated officer of the Court. Counsel
and/or parties should be prepared to discuss all aspects of the case in anticipation of settlement.
Failure to prepare the case for the Pre-trial Conference, or failure to comply with the deadlines
delineated above could result in an order limiting evidence or testimony in the case, or imposing
counsel fees; and it is further
TRIAL ON MERITS:
__X 19. ORDERED, that there shall be a Trial on the Merits before this Court on
_____, 20xx at a.m./p.m. in Courtroom F- _, Courthouse East, 111 N. Calvert Street,
before the Honorable ______________on the issue(s) of: __________. The hearing shall be
limited in time to _ hours/day; and it is further
REQUIRED DOCUMENTS:
__X 20. ORDERED, that the parties shall comply with the following document
requirements:
__X__ a. Rule 9-207 Joint Statement of Marital and Non-marital Property shall be
filed at least 10 days prior to the Trial on the Merits;
__X__ b. Parties shall complete a Financial Statement pursuant to Maryland
Rule 9-203;
__X__ c. Parties/counsel shall prepare a Child Support Guidelines Worksheet;
__X__ d. The parties shall each bring to the hearing documentation of current income from
all sources, including the last four (4) paycheck stubs, and most recent federal and
state income tax returns;
__X__ e. Prior to the Pre-trial Conference, parties/counsel shall exchange lists of all
exhibits intended to be introduced at trial and of witnesses to be called at trial.
__X__ f. Parties will bring to the hearing proof of parentage, either in the form of a
birth certificate for the minor child or an affidavit of parentage.
X__ 21. ORDERED that if the parties have reached a Comprehensive Parenting Plan under
Rule 9-204.1, they shall file it with the Clerk of the Court within five working days of reaching
agreement on same; and it is further
ORDERED, that if the parties are unable to reach a Comprehensive Parenting Plan, they
shall file with the Clerk of the Court a Joint Statement Concerning Decision Making Authority
and Parenting Time (“Joint Parenting Statement”) as required by Maryland Rule 9-204.2. The
Joint Parenting Statement shall be filed at least 10 days prior to the date of the settlement
conference noted above. If no settlement conference has been scheduled pursuant to this Order,
the Joint Parenting Statement shall be filed with Clerk of the Court at least 20 days before the trial
date noted above. The Joint Parenting Statement shall be submitted in a format consistent with
Court form DR-110. The parties are directed to Rule 9-204.2(c) with respect to their obligations
to serve a proposed Joint Parenting Statement on the opposing party and finalize the Joint
Parenting Statement for submission to the Court.
ADDITIONAL ORDERS:
__X 22. ORDERED, that _____; and it is further
__X 23. AGREEMENT REACHED-ORDER ATTACHED: The parties were able to reach
an agreement on the following issues: --- and that agreement was placed on the record by the
Court. The following Order(s) incorporating that agreement is./are attached: ----. Any additional
issues will be dealt with in accordance with this Scheduling Order; and it is further
__X 24. AGREEMENT REACHED-COUNSEL TO PREPARE CONSENT ORDER. The
parties were able to reach an agreement on the following issues: ---, and that agreement was placed
on the record by the Court. Counsel for ---, --- will be submitting a consent Order to the court
within --- days. Any remaining issues will be dealt with in accordance with this Scheduling Order;
and it is further
__X 25. ORDERED, that the Plaintiff/Defendant was referred to the Judicare program
administered by the Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service; and it is further
__X 26. ORDERED, that there shall be a child support audit conducted pursuant to the
attached Order for Child Support Audit; and it is further
__X 27. ORDERED, that the Order for Mediation of Custody/Visitation Issues dated
______, 2023 shall be VACATED; and it is further
__X_ 28. ORDERED, that case numbers 24-___ and 24-_____ shall be consolidated (see
attached Consolidation Order); and it is further
__X__ 29. ORDERED, that the Plaintiff/Defendant ______ waived his/her request for _____
on the record; and it is further
__X_ 30. ORDERED, that the referral to the Co-Parenting Education Seminar shall be
VACATED; and it is further
__X_ 31. ORDERED, that the [name of pleading] filed by the Plaintiff, [name], shall be
DISMISSED due to the Plaintiff/Defendant’s failure to appear at the Scheduling conference; and
it is further
__X_ 32. ORDERED that all the foregoing shall be subject to the continuing jurisdiction and
further Order of this Court.
NOTICE: IF YOU WOULD LIKE THE COURT TO REVIEW ANY
EMAILS, TEXT MESSAGES, PHOTOGRAPHS, SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS
OR OTHER EVIDENCE STORED ELECTRONICALLY, YOU MUST
PRINT OUT COPIES. THE COURT WILL NOT READ DOCUMENTS
STORED ON YOUR CELL PHONE, TABLET, OR LAPTOP COMPUTER.
__________________________________
Judge
THIS IS A PROPER ORDER TO
BE SIGNED IN THIS CASE.
_______________
Family Magistrate
NOTICE TO CLERK:
Kindly forward copies of this Order to:
1.
Baltimore, Maryland 21
(Counsel for) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
2.
Baltimore, Maryland 21
(Counsel for) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
ff166c9c22601f0d1b9e22166efb1fca217b7649e4aba519edf480001609293b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.