MD · rules
Md. Admin. Order of 2024-09-30 (Implementation of a Mental Health Court in ...)
Implementation of a Mental Health Court in the District Court for Anne Arundel County
IN THE MATTER OF THE * IN THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF A *
MENTAL HEALTH COURT * SUPREME COURT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR *
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY * OF MARYLAND
* * * * * * * * * * * *
ORDER
Whereas, the District Administrative Judge for the District Court for Anne Arundel
County and the Problem-Solving Court Judge for Anne Arundel County submitted a detailed
plan for the establishment of a Mental Health Court to the Judicial Council’s Committee on
Specialty Courts and Dockets for its review and recommendation in compliance with Maryland
Rule 16-207 and the Administrative Order on the Approval of Problem-Solving Court Programs
in the Circuit and District Courts; and
Whereas, upon the recommendation of the Judicial Council’s Committee on Specialty
Courts and Dockets, the State Court Administrator reviewed the plan and recommends its
establishment,
Now, therefore, pursuant to the authority conferred by Article IV, § 18, of the Maryland
Constitution, I do hereby order this 30th day of September 2024, effective immediately, that the
establishment of the Mental Health Court in the District Court for Anne Arundel County is
approved.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader
Honorable Matthew J. Fader
Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Maryland
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal
Filed: September 30, 2024 Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State
Government Article) this document is authentic.
/s/ Gregory Hilton 2024.09.30
Gregory Hilton, Esq. 09:04:07-04'00'
Clerk, Supreme Court of Maryland Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
718a3203036f3a17bcd99458afad1b641f271209b013b79ab39ecd034b7a7de0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.