Bindinglaw

MD · rules

Md. Admin. Order of 2023-08-04 (Implementation of a DUI Court in the ...)

Implementation of a DUI Court in the District Court for Montgomery County

activein force · 2023-08-04 – presentact-effective-date

IN THE MATTER OF THE * IN THE

IMPLEMENTATION OF A *

DUI COURT * SUPREME COURT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT *

FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY * OF MARYLAND

ORDER

Whereas, the Administrative Judge and the Problem-Solving Court Judge of the

District Court for Montgomery County submitted a detailed plan for the establishment of

a DUI Court to the Judicial Council’s Committee on Specialty Courts and Dockets for its

review and recommendation in compliance with Maryland Rule 16-207 and the

Administrative Order on the Approval of Problem-Solving Court Programs in the Circuit

and District Courts; and

Whereas, upon the recommendation of the Judicial Council’s Committee on

Specialty Courts and Dockets, the State Court Administrator reviewed the plan and

recommends its establishment,

Now, therefore, pursuant to the authority conferred by Article IV, § 18, of the

Maryland Constitution, it is this 4th day of August 2023, effective immediately, ordered that

the establishment of a DUI Court in the District Court for Montgomery County is approved.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice

Filed: August 4, 2023

/s/ Gregory Hilton

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials

Gregory Hilton Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this

Clerk document is authentic.

Supreme Court of Maryland 2023-08-04 11:15-04:00

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Provenance

Source
www.mdcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
d4d1199fbdf64b976e33697e02f1f0a6f7ddf17125485e2222c356a604c28db9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.