MD · rules
Md. Admin. Order of 2022-04-27 (Pilot Project on Landlord and Tenant Electronic ...)
Pilot Project on Landlord and Tenant Electronic Filing in Failure to Pay Rent Matters in the District Court of Maryland in Baltimore County
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON A PILOT PROJECT ON LANDLORD AND TENANT
ELECTRONIC FILING IN FAILURE TO PAY RENT MATTERS IN THE DISTRICT
COURT OF MARYLAND IN BALTIMORE COUNTY
WHEREAS, The Maryland Judiciary is considering the use of mandatory electronic
filing as a more efficient means of filing for failure to pay rent cases; and
WHEREAS, Electronic filing is an essential aspect of the Maryland Electronic
Courts project (MDEC) so that filings can be transmitted to the court and so that documents
and data are received into the MDEC System more effectively and accurately; and
WHEREAS, The electronic filing of failure to pay rent cases will improve court
process efficiencies; and
WHEREAS, It is desirable that a pilot project be established to determine the
efficacy of the use of electronic filing in failure to pay rent cases; and
WHEREAS, Once a pilot project is implemented and its outcomes evaluated, the
viability of mandatory electronic filing in all failure to pay rent cases by all filers in MDEC
jurisdictions may be determined,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Matthew J. Fader, Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals and
administrative head of the Judicial Branch, pursuant to the authority conferred by Article
IV, § 18 of the Maryland Constitution, do hereby order this 27th day of April 2022:
(a) The Chief Judge of the District Court of Maryland is hereby autho rized to
implement, effective June 6, 2022, a Pilot Project on Failure to Pay Rent
Electronic Filing (“Pilot Project”) in the District Court of Maryland in Baltimore
County, which shall be conducted for at least four (4) months, absent exigent
circumstances requiring a change in the design or duration; and
(b) Further, the outcomes of the Pilot Project are to be evaluated by the District
Court Headquarters, in coordination with the Major Projects Committee, with
recommendations as to the efficacy of the Pilot Project and the viability of
mandatory electronic filing in failure to pay rent cases for all filers in all MDEC
jurisdictions; and
(c) Further, once the viability of the Pilot Project is determined, the Chief Judge of
the District Court is authorized to implement mandatory electronic filing for
failure to pay rent cases in MDEC jurisdictions in phases as follows:
i. The District Court of Maryland in Baltimore County;
ii. The District Court of Maryland in Prince George’s County as a part of its
implementation of MDEC;
iii. The remaining District Courts already utilizing MDEC, after a reasonable
amount of time has passed from the Prince George’s County MDEC
implementation, but not less than three (3) months after implementation,
so as to ensure sufficient allocation of resources; and
iv. The District Court in Baltimore City as part of its implementation of
MDEC; and
(d) This Order shall be rescinded upon the completion of section (c) without further
Order of this Court.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader
Matthew J. Fader
Chief Judge
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Filed: April 27, 2022
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal
Materials Act
(§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
/s/ Suzanne C. Johnson 2022-04-27 09:53-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson
Clerk
Court of Appeals of Maryland Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
bf332b314f04f5a238668fe1b2923be511534e25595d3c6b10df1a382238b3dd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.