MD · rules
Md. Admin. Order of 2021-11-23 (Updated Administrative and Procedural Guidelines of the ...) 6.6
Recommendation
6.6.1. If the Panel determines, by a majority vote of its members, that the Statement of
Charges has a substantial basis and that there is reason to believe that the
Respondent has committed professional misconduct or is incapacitated, and that a
reprimand and/or conditional diversion agreement is the appropriate
recommendation, it shall:
a. Reprimand. If the Panel determines that a reprimand is the appropriate
recommendation, , the Panel shall inform Bar Counsel and the Respondent. If Bar
Counsel and the Respondent agree, then the contents of the proposed reprimand
shall be presented to the Panel, and if satisfactory to the Panel, the recommendation
of the Panel to the Commission shall include and incorporate the contents of the
proposed reprimand. If Bar Counsel and the Respondent reject the Panel’s
determination that a reprimand is the appropriate recommendation, the Panel shall
not make said recommendation to the Commission. If Bar Counsel rejects but the
Respondent accepts the Panel’s determination that a reprimand is the appropriate
recommendation, the Panel shall make said recommendation to the Commission
with the contents of the proposed reprimand executed by the Respondent.
b. Conditional Diversion Agreement. If the Panel determines, by a majority vote
of its members, that the attorney should enter into a Conditional Diversion
Agreement, either with or without a reprimand, the Panel shall inform Bar Counsel
and the Respondent. If Bar Counsel or the Respondent rejects the determination
that a Conditional Diversion Agreement be adopted, the Pa nel shall not make said
recommendation to the Commission. If Bar Counsel and the Respondent agree to
a Conditional Diversion Agreement, then the contents of the Conditional Diversion
Agreement, and any prop osed reprimand, shall be presented to the Panel, and if
satisfactory to the Panel, the recommendation of the Panel to the Commission shall
include and incorporate the contents of the Conditional Diversion Agreement.
c. The Panel may allow up to ten (10) working days for the parties to present to the
Panel an executed proposed reprimand or Conditional Diversion Agreement. If the
parties fail to present an executed proposed reprim and or Conditional Diversion
Agreement within ten (10) working days, the Panel shall not recommend a
Conditional Diversion Agreement but may recommend a reprimand with the
agreement of the Respondent or take such other action as it deems appropriate
consistent with the Maryland Rules and these Guidelines.
6.6.2. The recommendation of the Peer Review Panel and any dissent shall be in writing
and directed to the Executive Counsel and Director who sha ll receive the
recommendation on behalf of the Commission. Upon receipt of the
recommendation the Executive Counsel and Director shall provide a copy of the
recommendation and any dissent to Bar Counsel and the Respondent.
6.6.3. The recommendation of the Panel shall contain its recommendation for action on
each complaint addressed by the Panel and shall state:
a. Dismissal. In the case of a recommended dismissal, the reason for the dismissal.
b. Dismissal with Letter of Cautionary Advice or Letter of Admonition. In the case
of a recommended dismissal with a letter of cautionary advice or letter of
admonition, the nature of the misconduct for which the Respondent should be
advised or admonished and the Rule or Rules of Professional Conduct determined
to have been violated by the Respondent.
c. Reprimand. In the case of a recommended reprimand, the nature of the
misconduct for which the Respondent should be reprimanded and a copy of any
proposed reprimand executed by the Respondent, and when both parties are in
agreement, by the Respondent and Bar Counsel.
d. Conditional Diversion Agreement. In the case of a recommended Conditional
Diversion Agreement, a copy of a proposed Conditional Diversion Agreement
executed by the Respondent and Bar Counsel.
e. Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action. In the case of a recommendation
that a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action be filed, a brief description of
the Respondent’s alleged misconduct. The Panel may, but need not, designate the
Rules of Professional Conduct violated by the Respondent.
f. Incapacity. In the case of any determination that the Respondent is incapacitated,
the nature of such incapacity.
14 Updated __________________, 2021
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
97868e6b82992c01823dec9e044fcc3ed00d638aa9caa43d4d97830d1de8c37c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.