Bindinglaw

MD · rules

Md. Admin. Order of 2021-10-21 (Petitions for a Writ of Habeas Corpus ...)

Administrative Order Concerning Petitions for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed in the Court of Appeals

activein force · 2021-10-21 – presentact-effective-date

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER CONCERNING

PETITIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

WHEREAS, Maryland Code (2020 Repl. Vol.), § 3-701, et seq. of the Courts &

Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJP”) and Rule 15-301 et seq. of the Maryland Rules

authorize a judge of the Court of Appeals to grant a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and

to exercise jurisdiction in all matters pertaining to habeas corpus, and

WHEREAS, pursuant to CJP § 3-702(b) and Rule 15-303(a) & (c), a judge of the

Court of Appeals who is presented with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of

a person confined or restrained as a result of a prior judicial proceeding is to refer that

petition to the administrative judge of the court in which the prior proceeding was held, if

the judge of the Court of Appeals does not otherwise act on the petition, and

WHEREAS, adjudication of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus may require an

inquiry into factual circumstances concerning the petitioner’s restraint or confinement, and

WHEREAS, pursuant to CJP § 3-707, if a judge of a circuit court refuses to issue

a writ of habeas corpus under Rule 15-303(b) relating to the petitioner’s right to bail, the

petitioner may apply to the Court of Special Appeals for leave to appeal that determination,

and

WHEREAS, on occasion an individual submits a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus to the Court of Appeals, but not directed to any individual judge, by submitting the

petition to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, and

WHEREAS, it has been the practice of the Court of Appeals to have a petition for

a writ of habeas corpus that is submitted to the Court, but not to any individual judge,

referred by the Clerk to the administrative judge of the court in which the prior proceeding

resulting in the petitioner’s restraint or confinement was held, without taking any other

action on the application, it is this 21st day of October 2021,

ORDERED, that, consistent with past practice, a copy of a petition for writ of

habeas corpus filed with the Court of Appeals, but not directed to any individual judge,

shall be distributed to the members of the Court,

ORDERED, that, consistent with past practice, ten days after distribution of the

petition to the Court, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the Clerk shall refer a petition

for a writ of habeas corpus filed with the Court of Appeals, but not directed to any

individual judge, to the administrative judge of the court in which the prior proceeding was

held, and it is further

ORDERED, that, if a petition filed with the Court of Appeals is, in substance, an

effort by the petitioner to appeal a decision by a judge of a circuit court under Rule 15-

303(b) relating to the petitioner’s right to bail, the filing shall be transferred, pursuant to

Rule 8-132 to the Court of Special Appeals, to be treated as an application for leave to

appeal under CJP § 3-707, and it is further

ORDERED that, with respect to any petition for a writ of habeas corpus which may

not fall within the categories covered by this Order, the Clerk shall consult with the Senior

Judge of the Court of Appeals, who may refer the petition to the entire Court as necessary.

/s/ Joseph M. Getty

Joseph M. Getty

Chief Judge

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Filed: October 21, 2021

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal

Materials Act

(§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

/s/ Suzanne C. Johnson 2021-10-21 15:59-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson

Clerk

Court of Appeals of Maryland Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Provenance

Source
www.mdcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
8ae023f7a51623a53f5d631a930af8f4d384cd106ec700d6136ba242b4e6c907
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.