MD · rules
Md. Admin. Order of 2020-04-22 (Conclusion of the Pilot Project on Text ...)
Conclusion of the Pilot Project on Text Notification of Court Events and Expansion of Implementation
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONCLUSION OF THE
PILOT PROJECT ON TEXT NOTIFICATION OF COURT EVENTS AND
EXPANSION OF IMPLEMENTATION
WHEREAS, The State Court Administrator, in coordination with the Chief Judge
of the District Court of Maryland, was authorized by the Administrative Order on a Pilot
Project on Text Notification of Court Events, filed January 16, 2018, to develop and
implement a Pilot Project on Text Notification o f Court Events ( “Pilot Project”), to be
conducted for at least six (6) months, absent exigent circumstances requiring a change in
the design or duration; and
WHEREAS, The initial implementation of the Pilot Project began December 3,
2018; and
WHEREAS, Circumstances necessitated extension of the Pilot Project by the
Administrative Office of the Courts in order to obtain sufficient and relevant data to prepare
the report with recommendations by the State Court Administrator to the Chief Judge of
the Court of Appeals as to the efficacy of the Pilot Project and the feasibility, if any, of
broadening the scope of such voluntary text notifications; and
WHEREAS, The Pilot Project was completed on April 20, 2020, and a report with
recommendations having been prepared by the Administrative Office of the Courts with a
recommendation by the State Court Administrator to implement text messaging statewide
and further to expand the case types in which voluntary text notification may be offered,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mary Ellen Barbera, Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals
and administrative head of the Judicial Branch, pursuant to the authority conferred by
Article IV, § 18 of the Maryland Constitution, do hereby order this 22nd day of April 2020,
effective immediately:
The report of the Administrative Office of the Courts indicates that the Pilot Project
has d emonstrated that the use of voluntary text messages to provide reminders about
scheduled events has been effective in helping to reduce failures to appear by defendants
in criminal matters and is hereby accepted; and
Consistent with the recommendation of the State Court Administrator to implement
such text notification on statewide basis, voluntary text notification is authorized to be
implemented statewide in accordance with criteria and pursuant to an implementation
schedule established by the State Court Administrator in the District Court of Maryland
and the circuit courts, after consultation with the Chief Judge of the District Court and the
administrative judges of the circuit courts, respectively, and which may be updated from
time to time; and
Expansion of text notification about court events and related case in formation to
additional case and party types further is authorized to be implemented statewide in
accordance with criteria and pursuant to an implementation schedule established by the
State Court Administrator in the District Court of Maryland and the circuit courts, after
consultation with the Chief Judge of the District Court and the administrative judges of the
circuit courts, respectively, and which may be updated from time to time; and
The text notification pilot project, having been completed, is hereby authorized to
continue on a permanent b asis, subject to the changes described in the preceding
paragraphs; and
The Administrative Order on Administrative Order on a Pilot Project on Text
Notification of Court Events, filed January 16, 2018, shall be and hereby is rescinded
effective immediately.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera
Mary Ellen Barbera
Chief Judge
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Filed: April 22, 2020
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act
(§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document
is authentic.
/s/ Suzanne C. Johnson Suzanne Johnson
2020-04-22 15:32-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson
Clerk
Court of Appeals of Maryland Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
47c5c87e746f6a695a68bee097d36ee0a352ed79564027c8ce6ca14ef86087ba
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.