MD · rules
Md. Admin. Order of 2007-03-05 (Agreements for Liquidation of Law Practices)
Agreements for Liquidation of Law Practices
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AS TO AGREEMENTS
FOR LIQUIDATION OF LAW PRACTICES
WHEREAS, A judge-designate is allowed under Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial
Proceedings Article, § 1-203, to enter into an agreement with a law firm or successor in
practice for payment of the reasonable liquidated value of the judge-designate’s or -elect’s
law practice as of the date of its termination; and
WHEREAS, Prior to the Court of Appeals’ adoption of a new Code of Judicial
Conduct, effective July 1, 2005, former Rule 16-813, per Canon 4I (2), made presumptively
reasonable a five-year period for payments pursuant to such liquidated value agreements to
be received by judges and former Rule 16-814, per Canon 4I(3), suggested that certain
judicial appointees should file such agreements; and
WHEREAS, The Administrative Office of the Courts has recommended that the
presumption be continued for guidance of new judge-designates and -elects; and
WHEREAS, There exist circumstances in which the 5-year period may need to be
renewed;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Robert M. Bell, Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals and
administrative head of the Judicial Branch, pursuant to the authority conferred by Article IV,
§ 18 of the Maryland Constitution, do hereby order this 5th day of March, 2007:
1. That, as to all agreements submitted to the Administrative Office of the Courts on or
after the date of this Order, a payment period of up to a maximum of 5 years is
presumptively reasonable;
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AS TO AGREEMENTS FOR LIQUIDATION OF LAW PRACTICES
2. That the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals may renew the payment period on
application documenting the need for renewal;
3. That, by October 1, 2007, the Administrative Office of the Courts shall consider, and
make recommend to the Judicial Cabinet, whether:
A. This presumptive period should be made permanent by amendment of
Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § 1-203 or by adoption of a rule;
and
B. A provision should be adopted by rule, statute, or otherwise, for the
filing of an agreement by a judicial appointee, as defined in the Terminology portion of
Maryland Rule 16-814, with the Administrative Office of the Courts or, in the case of judicial
appointees other than judges, the appointing court.
/s/ Robert M. Bell
Robert M. Bell
Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals
Filed: March 5, 2007
Alexander L. Cummings
Alexander L. Cummings
Clerk
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
e5434f84cdb9fc2d90d34b03f7a1396979c2cae2609d70f4edd1d765ff466543
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.