MD · rules
Md. Admin. Order of 2005-09-29 (Approving General Records Retention and Disposal Schedule ...)
Approving General Records Retention and Disposal Schedule 2330 and Conforming Provisions as to Court Reporting Notes
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER APPROVING GENERAL RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSAL
SCHEDULE 2330 AND
WHEREAS, By letter dated July 22, 2005, the Records Retention Committee forwarded a
proposed Schedule No. 2330, to replace current General Schedules Nos. 655, 655A-1, 655A-2, and
1044, governing records of the Circuit Courts of Maryland; and
WHEREAS, The proposed Schedule was submitted for comment to the Conference of Circuit
Judges, the Conference of Circu it Court Clerks, the Conference of Court Administrators, and the
Circuit Court Clerks’ Association and approved unanimously by each of those organizations; and
WHEREAS, After review, I concur in adoption of the proposed Schedule as set forth in the
attachment and also amend the Administrative Order Setting Minimum Requirements for Court
Reporting and Transcription in Maryland Courts, date February 16, 2005, to alter the provisions on
record retention pending final recommendations on concomitant rule changes to be made by the
Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure in conjunction with the Standing Committee
on Court Reporting; and
WHEREAS, On final authorization of the Schedule by the State Archivist, the Schedule should
be made available on the Judiciary’s website and otherwise disseminated as the State Court
Administrator considers appropriate;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Robert M. Bell, Chie f Judge of the Court of Appeals and the
administrative head of the Judicial Branch of this State, pursuant to the authority conferred by Article
IV, §18 of the Maryland Constitution, Maryland Code, State Government Article § 10-632, Code of
Maryland Regulations 14.18.02F, and Maryland Rules 16-404 and 16-818, do, this 29 th day of
September, 2005:
(1) Rescind General Retention Schedules No. 655, 655A-1, 655A-2, and 1044 and approval
General Retention and Disposal Schedule No. 2033, to be effective on authorization of the latter by
the State Archivist;
(2) Order that Schedule No. 2033 be made available on the Judiciary’s website and
otherwise disseminated as the State Court Administrator considers appropriate on final authorization
as above; and
(3) Amend the Administrative Order Setting Minimum Requirements for Court Reporting
and Transcription in Maryland Courts, date February 16, 2005, in part as follows:
9. a. Scope. This Section [does not apply to:
(1)] APPLIES ONLY TO a recording of a grand jury proceeding [;
or
(2) an electronic tape recording made by or for a master] OF WHICH
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH HAS CUSTODY.
b. Retention Periods. Subject to the limitations AND PROCEDURES in
[this Section, with the written approval of a Circuit Administrative Judge] GENERAL RECORDS
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL SCHEDULE 2330, [a clerk of court] AN OFFICIAL
CUSTODIAN, AS DEFINED IN MARYLAND CODE, STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE,
§ 10-611(C) may dispose of notes [at any time after the expiration of the following periods:
(1) in a civil case, 5 years after the notes are taken; and
(2) in a criminal case, 12 years after the notes are taken] IN THE
CUSTODY OF THE OFFICIAL CUSTODIAN AND DIRECT OTHER CUSTODIANS TO
DISPOSE OF OTHER NOTES.
[c. Disposition Schedule.
(1) At intervals set by a Circuit Administrative Judge, each
individual providing court reporting services in the circuit or a designee of the Circuit Administrative
Judge shall draft a schedule for disposal of notes.
(2) The supervisory court reporter or, if none, the individual providing
court reporting services or the Circuit Administrative Judge’s designee, shall submit:
(i) a schedule for a circuit to the State Archives for
its recommendations; and
(ii) a schedule and the recommendations of the State
Archives to the Circuit Administrative Judge.
(3) A Circuit Administrative Judge may approve or disapprove a
schedule. Approval of a schedule shall be in writing and shall be deemed a court order for disposal
of the notes in accordance with the schedule.
(4) As approved, each schedule shall:
(i) identify the notes, by case name and number, or by
reference to permanent source documents such as the court’s dockets and minutes of proceedings;
(ii) state the date on which, or the inclusive dates during which,
the notes were taken;
(iii) state whether the State Archives accepts or declines
to accept the notes for preservation;
(iv) state the manner in which notes that the State Archives has
declined to accept will be disposed of; and
(v) state the place to which notes that the State Archives has
accepted will be removed.
d. Removal. Notes that the State Archives accepts shall be removed
in accordance with the procedures for the Archives.
e. Disposal Certificate. After di sposal of notes, the supervisory
court reporter or, if none, the individual providing court reporting services or the Circuit Administrative Judge’s designee, shall send a certificate of disposal to the State Archives.]
10. Application.
C. THE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9 OF THIS ORDER DOES NOT
AFFECT ANY DISPOSITION OF NOTES AUTHORIZED OR EFFECTED BEFORE THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDMENT.
12. Effective Dates.
Sections 1 and 3 of this Order shall take effect immediately. THE AMENDMENT TO
SECTIONS 9 AND 12 AND THE ADDITION OF SECTION 10C SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON
AUTHORIZATION OF GENERAL RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSAL SCHEDULE
2330 BY THE STATE ARCHIVIST. The balance of this Order shall take effect on April 18, 2005.
/s/ Robert M. Bell
Robert M. Bell
Chief Judge for the Court of Appeals
Filed: September 29, 2005
/s/ Alexander L. Cummings
Alexander L. Cummings
Clerk
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
da1a325679cbe015a8cd44c5eed3903b8a847bd3af6aa7d1a810fb19088a2a94
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.