MA · jury_instructions
Instruction 7.800, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court
Distribution, manufacturing, or cultivating a controlled substance other than marijuana (G.L. c. 94C, s.s. 32-32D)
A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN MARIJUANA
[DISTRIBUTION] [MANUFACTURING] [CULTIVATING] OF A
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN MARIJUANA
G.L. c. 94C, §§ 32-32D
The defendant is charged with unlawfully (distributing)
(manufacturing) (cultivating) a controlled substance, namely
______________.
In order to prove the defendant guilty of this offense, the
Commonwealth must prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt.
First: That the substance in question was a controlled
substance, namely ________ ;
See G.L. c. 94C, § 31, for the statutory schedule of controlled substances.
Second: That the defendant (distributed) (manufactured)
(cultivated) some perceptible amount of that substance; and
Third: That the defendant did so knowingly or intentionally.
To prove the first element, the Commonwealth must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that the substance was in fact a
controlled substance, namely: ___________. I instruct you as a
matter of law that our statutes define ________ as a controlled
substance. In determining whether the material in question was in
A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN MARIJUANA
fact __________, you may consider all the relevant evidence that was
presented.
To prove the second element, the Commonwealth must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (distributed)
(manufactured) (cultivated) some perceptible amount of that
substance.
Distribute The term “distribute” means to transfer, or to assist or
participate in the transfer of a controlled substance to another
person. The Commonwealth is not required to prove that any money
or other compensation was involved.
• If warranted by the evidence, continue with the supplemental instruction “Simultaneous and
Joint Acquisition of a Controlled Substance.
Cultivate The term “cultivate” means the activities related to the
raising, nourishing, or fostering the growth of plants.
Commonwealth v. Palmer, 464 Mass. 773, 778-79 (2013).
Manufacture The term “manufacture” means the production,
preparation, and growing of a controlled substance.
A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN MARIJUANA
Manufacturing includes the compounding, conversion or
processing of a controlled substance.
(Compounding is the mixing of two or more existing parts
together.)
(Conversion is the process of changing something from
one thing to another.)
G.L. c. 94C, § 1.
To prove the third element, the Commonwealth must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant engaged in the activity
knowingly or intentionally.
• The judge may use the detailed instruction on “Intent” from instruction 3.120, the detailed
Instruction on “Knowledge” from Instruction 3.140, or the shorter versions below, if
appropriate.
In other words, the defendant must have acted consciously,
voluntarily and purposely, and not because of ignorance, mistake or
accident. The Commonwealth is required to prove that the defendant
knew the substance was a controlled substance, but it is not required
to prove that the defendant knew which particular controlled
substance it was. We often must decide from the actions of others
what they knew or what they intended. You are to decide what the
A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN MARIJUANA
defendant knew or intended from the evidence, together with any
reasonable inferences that you choose to draw from it.
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez, 415 Mass. 447, 454 (1993); Commonwealth v. DePalma, 41
Mass. App. Ct. 798, 801 (1996).
If the Commonwealth proved all the elements beyond a
reasonable doubt, you should return a verdict of guilty. If the
Commonwealth failed to prove any element beyond a reasonable
doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty.
SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION
Simultaneous and Joint Acquisition of a Controlled Substance
Where two or more people at the outset simultaneously and
jointly acquire possession of a drug for their own use intending only
to share it together, the crime is possession of a controlled
substance, not distribution of a controlled substance.
Commonwealth v. Carrillo, 483 Mass. 269 (2019); Commonwealth v. Jackson, 464 Mass. 758, 763-63
(2013), citing Commonwealth v. Johnson, 413 Mass. 598, 605 (1992) (distinguishing between
“circumstances where a defendant facilitates a transfer of drugs from a seller to a buyer,” which can
constitute the crime of distribution even if the defendant intends to share some of the drug with the buyer,
and “the passing of a drug between joint possessors who simultaneously acquire possession at the outset
for their own use,” which does not constitute distribution).
A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN MARIJUANA
History
Instruction 7.800, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court (Revised November 2021). Published by the Administrative Office of the District Court, District Court Department of the Trial Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on www.mass.gov. © 1988-2009 Administrative Office of the District Court; reproduced under its title-page permission ("You may freely reproduce or copy this work if you identify its source and any changes made to the original work"). Source: https://www.mass.gov/doc/7800-distribution-manufacturing-or-cultivating-a-controlled-substance-other-than-marijuana-gl-c-94c-ss-32-32d/download. Changes made: the text is extracted from the published PDF (verified by three extraction engines); the running headers, page numbers and line layout are removed, and a closing NOTES section, where printed, is carried as the note.
Provenance
- Source
- mass.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
41de24a25c500c6a56e25ac629c55cd8d68f6f64df8d633f2265b5817b6e530e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.