MA · jury_instructions
Instruction 7.300, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court
Giving false name upon arrest (G.L. c. 268, § 34A)
GIVING FALSE INFORMATION AFTER ARREST
G.L. c. 268, § 34A
[The statute was amended effective April 13, 2018. See st. 2018, c. 69, § 156. Previously it pertained
only to giving a false name or Social Security number.]
The defendant is charged with knowingly and willfully giving
false information to a police officer after being arrested.
In order to prove the defendant guilty of this offense, the
Commonwealth must prove the following three things beyond a
reasonable doubt.
First: That the defendant was arrested;
Second: That the defendant then gave a false (name) (Social
Security number) (date of birth) (home address) (mailing address)
(phone number) (information requested for the purposes of
establishing the person’s identity) to a law enforcement (officer)
(official); (and)
and Third: That the defendant did so knowingly and willfully;
that is, he (she) intentional gave the police that information for a
dishonest purpose.
Commonwealth v. Clark, 446 Mass. 620 (2006).
SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS
1. False Name The law permits a person to change his
(her) name at will, without resort to legal proceedings,
merely by adopting another name, as long as he (she) is
not using that name for a dishonest purpose. For
purposes of this charge, a false name is one used for a
dishonest purpose.
2. Examples of dishonest purposes Dishonest purposes include,
but are not limited to, concealing one’s criminal record to
avoid being charged as a multiple offender, concealing
one’s criminal record to obtain more favorable bail
consideration, concealing one’s identity to avoid
answering to an outstanding warrant, or creating a new
identity in order to default and avoid prosecution on the
charge for which one has been arrested.
Clark, supra.
3. Prior identification to police using different name If a person
previously has identified himself (herself) to any police
department using information that is different from that
which he (she) used following this arrest and failed to
disclose his (her) prior use of that different information,
you are permitted to infer that his (her) failure to make
such disclosure was for a honest purpose and that he (she)
was using false information. You do not have to draw this
inference, but you may do so. It is entirely up to you.
Clark, supra.
4. Proof of true name unnecessary The Commonwealth does not
have to prove the defendant’s true information. The
Commonwealth is required to prove that he (she) used
false information, that is, that he (she) used information for
a dishonest purpose.
Clark, supra.
History
Instruction 7.300, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court (Revised April 2019). Published by the Administrative Office of the District Court, District Court Department of the Trial Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on www.mass.gov. © 1988-2009 Administrative Office of the District Court; reproduced under its title-page permission ("You may freely reproduce or copy this work if you identify its source and any changes made to the original work"). Source: https://www.mass.gov/doc/7300-giving-false-name-upon-arrest-gl-c-268-ss-34a/download. Changes made: the text is extracted from the published PDF (verified by three extraction engines); the running headers, page numbers and line layout are removed, and a closing NOTES section, where printed, is carried as the note.
Provenance
- Source
- mass.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
6e49fc352739af699c4a362bd12f08577c09040773ee38cff7fda63b56eee9c3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.