MA · jury_instructions
Instruction 5.305, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court
Endangering a child while operating with a blood alcohol level of .08% or greater
.08% OR GREATER
ENDANGERING A CHILD WHILE OPERATING WITH A BLOOD
ALCOHOL LEVEL OF .08% OR GREATER
(when OUI per se is also charged)
G.L. c. 90, § 24V
The defendant is also charged with endangering a child while
operating a motor vehicle while having a blood alcohol level of .08
percent or greater (and with endangering a child while operating a
motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol).
In order to prove the defendant guilty of this offense, the
Commonwealth must prove the same three elements that I have
described to you on the charge of operating a motor vehicle while
having a blood alcohol level of .08 percent or greater. It must also
prove beyond a reasonable doubt that while the defendant was
operating the vehicle, there was a child who was fourteen years of
age or younger present in the vehicle.
I instruct you that you cannot return a verdict of guilty on this
offense unless you first find the defendant guilty on the charge of
operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
.08% OR GREATER
If there are stipulations. Because the parties have stipulated
(that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle) (and)
(that the location was a public way) (that the location was
one to which the public had a right of access) (and) (that
the percentage of alcohol in the defendant’s blood was .08
or greater) (that a child fourteen years of age or younger
was present in the vehicle), the only element(s) the
Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is
(are) that the defendant elements). If the Commonwealth
has proved (that) (those) element(s) beyond a reasonable
doubt, you should return a verdict of guilty. If it has not,
you must find the defendant not guilty.
If there are no stipulations. There are four things that the Commonwealth
must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to obtain a conviction on this
charge:
First: That the defendant operated a motor vehicle;
Second: That the defendant did so (on a public way) (or) (in a
place where the public has a right of access) (or) (in a place where
members of the public have access as invitees or licensees); and
.08% OR GREATER
Third: That at the time (he) (she) operated the vehicle, the
percentage of alcohol in the defendant’s blood was .08 or greater, and
Fourth: That while the defendant was operating the vehicle,
there was a child present in the vehicle who was fourteen years of age
or younger.
If the Commonwealth has proven all four elements beyond a
reasonable doubt, you should return a verdict of guilty. If the
Commonwealth has failed to prove one or more of these elements
beyond a reasonable doubt, you must return a verdict of not guilty.
History
Instruction 5.305, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court (April 2019). Published by the Administrative Office of the District Court, District Court Department of the Trial Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on www.mass.gov. © 1988-2009 Administrative Office of the District Court; reproduced under its title-page permission ("You may freely reproduce or copy this work if you identify its source and any changes made to the original work"). Source: https://www.mass.gov/doc/5305-endangering-a-child-while-operating-with-a-blood-alcohol-level-of-08-or-greater/download. Changes made: the text is extracted from the published PDF (verified by three extraction engines); the running headers, page numbers and line layout are removed, and a closing NOTES section, where printed, is carried as the note.
Provenance
- Source
- mass.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
818b9bca7d9b0eb0384e1c020dd5e76471fb9299763e6ff15f00c46da879cb9b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.