MA · jury_instructions
Instruction 3.940, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court
Gang affiliation
GANG AFFILIATION
You have heard testimony about an alleged gang affiliation in
this case. I instruct you that you cannot use any evidence that the
defendant [was] [may have been] affiliated with [a gang] [people who
belong to a gang] to infer anything about the defendant’s character
or general propensity to commit a crime. Such evidence, standing
alone, does not make the defendant more likely to have (committed a
crime), (or) (acted violently).
Evidence of the defendant’s alleged gang affiliation was
admitted only for a limited purpose(s): to demonstrate [their motive
for committing the offense(s) involved] (and/or) [their participation in
a joint venture] and for no other purpose. You may not take that
evidence as a substitute for proof that the defendant committed the
crime(s) charged, nor may you consider it as proof that the
defendant has a bad character or a propensity to commit crimes.
SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS
In cases where there is evidence that the defendant believed someone else was
affiliated with a gang:
If there was credible evidence that the defendant
believed someone was affiliated with a gang, that alone is
not evidence that the person was, indeed, a gang member.
Therefore, you may not use that evidence to infer that the
person was a gang member. Such evidence was admitted
solely on the issue of the defendant's state of mind for
what the defendant believed, at a particular time, and for no
other purpose.
Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 429 Mass. 502, 505 (1999).
In cases where there is testimony from an “expert” about indicia of gang
affiliation:
When a case involves allegations of gang affiliation, a
person with special training or experience in that subject
matter is permitted to give their opinion about that matter,
in order to help you as the jury. However, an expert
witness is like any other witness in that you alone make
the judgement about how much credibility and weight you
give the expert’s testimony and what conclusions you draw
from that testimony.
See Instruction 3.640 Expert Witness.
If the court inquired of venire about gang affiliation during empanelment:
I caution you and remind you of the promise you
made under oath when you were questioned before being
sworn in as a juror. You promised that you would not
allow any suggestion of gang association to affect your
ability to remain fair and impartial as a juror in this case,
and you must follow that promise in your deliberations.
See Commonwealth v. Rosario, 460 Mass. 181, 192 (2011) Commonwealth v.
Maldonado, 429 Mass. 502, 506 n. 1 (1999) for example of a comprehensive limiting
instruction. See also Massachusetts Jury Trial Benchbook, (4th Edition, 2019), Appendix
4DD – Sample Jury Instruction on Gang Affiliation or Involvement.
History
Instruction 3.940, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court (February 2024). Published by the Administrative Office of the District Court, District Court Department of the Trial Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on www.mass.gov. © 1988-2009 Administrative Office of the District Court; reproduced under its title-page permission ("You may freely reproduce or copy this work if you identify its source and any changes made to the original work"). Source: https://www.mass.gov/doc/3940-gang-affiliation/download. Changes made: the text is extracted from the published PDF (verified by three extraction engines); the running headers, page numbers and line layout are removed, and a closing NOTES section, where printed, is carried as the note.
Provenance
- Source
- mass.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
db3c3ce9656432fc7dd4a7d14b189ead02f9c13afb54646bf5a8ab118affb9dd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.