Bindinglaw

MA · jury_instructions

Instruction 3.900, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court

Intentionally not recorded exculpatory evidence

activein force · 2023-06-01 – presentas-observed

INTENTIONALLY NOT RECORDED EXCULPATORY

EVIDENCE

This instruction may be given as one possible judicial remedy in cases where

there is evidence that the police intentionally failed to record an encounter with

the defendant(s) in violation of departmental policy. To be entitled to this

instruction, the defendant must establish a “reasonable possibility, based on

concrete evidence" that recording would have been favorable to the defendant.

See Commonwealth v. Neal, 392 Mass. 1, 12 (1984). The Court must weigh “the

Commonwealth’s culpability, the materiality of the evidence, and the prejudice to

the defendant” in determining what remedy is appropriate. Commonwealth v.

Williams, 455 Mass. 706, 718 (2010).

You have (heard) (seen) evidence that a [_______ video] [______

audio recording] was intentionally not recorded in violation of the

officer’s departmental policy.

If the failure to record was intentional and was in violation of

department policy, you may infer that, if there was a recording, it

would have been favorable to the defendant. You are not compelled

to make this inference, but you may, after considering all of the facts

and circumstances you have heard about the failure to record.

History

Instruction 3.900, Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court (June 2023). Published by the Administrative Office of the District Court, District Court Department of the Trial Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on www.mass.gov. © 1988-2009 Administrative Office of the District Court; reproduced under its title-page permission ("You may freely reproduce or copy this work if you identify its source and any changes made to the original work"). Source: https://www.mass.gov/doc/3900-intentionally-not-recorded-exculpatory-evidence/download. Changes made: the text is extracted from the published PDF (verified by three extraction engines); the running headers, page numbers and line layout are removed, and a closing NOTES section, where printed, is carried as the note.

Provenance

Source
mass.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
40860da93a0d284558f1b5c0be920de085225f51d26775021a602c5ceb990816
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.