LA · rules
Unif. R. La. Cts. App. 2-16.1
Opinions of the Courts of Appeal
Opinions of the Court of Appeal, whether authored or per curiam, shall be formal
opinions or memorandum opinions.
A. A case may be disposed of by formal opinion when at least one of the
following criteria is satisfied. The formal opinion:
(1) establishes a new rule of law or alters or modifies an existing rule;
(2) involves a legal issue of continuing public interest;
(3) criticizes or explains existing law;
(4) applies an established rule of law to a factual situation significantly
different from that in published opinions of the courts of this state;
(5) resolves an apparent conflict of authority; or
(6) constitutes a significant and non-duplicative contribution to legal
literature because it contains:
(a) a historical review of the law;
(b) a review of legislative history; or
(c) a review of conflicting decisions among the courts or other
jurisdictions.
B. Where the panel unanimously agrees that a case does not qualify for
disposition by formal opinion, the case may be disposed of by a concise
memorandum opinion. A memorandum opinion shall succinctly state:
(1) the court from which the appeal comes;
(2) the germane facts, including the ruling of the lower court;
(3) the issues and contentions of the parties when appropriate;
(4) the reasons for the decision;
(5) the judgment of the Court of Appeal; and
(6) a statement that the memorandum opinion is issued in compliance with
Rule 2-16.1(B).
Provenance
- Source
- www.fifthcircuit.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
397bd517e6cbeca99af7e303097e345eeb5e1cac33758e032b1330173416e148
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.