Bindinglaw

LA · rules

La. Sup. Ct. R. IX, § 4

Subsequent Applications

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

A subsequent application for rehearing shall not be considered unless the applicant

has not previously applied for and been granted a rehearing, or unless the Court, in

deciding the case on rehearing, expressly reserves to the unsuccessful party or

parties the right to apply for an additional rehearing.

History

Repealed and re-enacted by the Supreme Court's order of December 2025 (Rules I–XII, XIV and XLII), effective 2026-01-01.

Provenance

Source
www.lasc.org
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
2026-09-18
Content hash
e8c2188a0d351e88e7acff62a06d5caefc629d1a9d0dc708fa200ae2e3092335
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
La. Sup. Ct. R. IX, § 4 — Subsequent Applications · binding.law