LA · rules
La. Child. Code art. 1269.5
Court approval; incorporation into judgment
A. The court shall review a continuing contact agreement executed in conformity with the requirements of this Chapter.
B. If the court finds that an agreement serves the best interest of the child, the agreement shall be incorporated into a judgment of the court. An agreement reached by the parties and approved by the department and counsel representing the child is presumed to serve the best interest of the child. The judgment shall provide that failure to comply with the terms of the agreement does not constitute grounds for annulling a surrender or the final decree of adoption.
C. If the court rejects the agreement, it shall make specific findings of fact in support of its conclusion that the best interest of the child would not be served by approval of the agreement. The factors to be considered shall include:
(1) The duration of the child's relationship with the parent, grandparent, sibling, or other relative by blood, adoption, or affinity seeking continuing contact.
(2) The strength of the psychological attachment between the child and the individual seeking continuing contact.
(3) The resulting harm to the child if the relationship is not preserved.
D. The court may receive expert testimony on the issue of continuing contact.
E. If the child is twelve years of age or older, the court shall solicit and consider the child's wishes in the matter.
History
Acts 2001, No. 568, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 2002; Acts 2008, No. 583, §2.
Provenance
- Source
- legis.la.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
18307b4696dc56ec1f24fa3755445bd5dfac47d9b48743a60c2a3730c1a86a9a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.