KY · rules
Ky. Sup. Ct. Order 2026-30
Court of Justice Framework & Guiding Principles for Policy Regarding Access to Court Records & Information
Supreme Court of Kentucky
2026-30
AMENDED ORDER
IN RE: COURT OF JUSTICE FRAMEWORK & GUIDING PRINCIPLES
FOR POLICY REGARDING ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS &
INFORMATION
The Court of Justice has a duty to maintain court records 1 for the use of
Court of Justice personnel and to ensure public access to those records, in
furtherance of the public’s trust, for the fair administration of justice. The
constant evolution of technology presents the Court of Justice with
unprecedented challenges in determining the balance between access to court
records, protection of personally identifying information, and the public’s right
to privacy.
Pursuant to Sec. 116 of the Kentucky Constitution and Supreme Court
Rule 1.010, and in order to continue to guide the business decisions involving
access to court records of the Court of Justice of Kentucky, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Court of Justice Framework and Guiding Principles for
Policy Regarding Access to Court Records/Information, adopted by the
Supreme Court of Kentucky, Administrative Order, entered February 17, 2000,
is renamed the Court of Justice Guiding Principles for Policy Regarding Next
Generation Access to Court Records, Information, and Data and is replaced in
its entirety as follows:
COURT OF JUSTICE GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR POLICY
REGARDING NEXT GENERATION ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS
PRINCIPLE 1: Court records are subject to disclosure except as defined by
statute and court rule. Denial of access to court records has the potential to
compromise the judiciary's role in society, inhibit accountability, and endanger
public safety, and any limitation of access should be scrutinized.
1 ”Cou r t r ecor ds‘ r efer s t o t h e officia l r ecor d of a pr oceedin g per CR 79.05 a n d RAP 27, a s well a s t h e
a ssocia t ed da t a collect ed by t h e cler k of t h e cou r t in t h e r egu la r cou r se of bu sin ess t h r ou gh u se of
elect r on ic syst em s a n d bu sin ess pr ocesses m a n da t ed by t h e Su pr em e Cou r t.
PRINCIPLE 2: Compliance with all laws governing confidentiality of court
records and the protection of personally identifiable information is
foundational.
PRINCIPLE 3: Court records are a public trust. The ownership and control of
court records is vested in the Supreme Court and should not be transferred to
other parties for any use except as authorized by the Supreme Court.
PRINCIPLE 4: The highest public benefit of court records is in their use to
further a public mission. The public-benefit test should be employed in
determining legitimate governmental or business uses of court records.
Commercial use is inconsistent with a public mission.
PRINCIPLE 5: Court records should be utilized to further judicial efficiencies,
justice, and a public mission. Business decisions utilizing court records should
consider risks and appropriate safeguards related to unnecessary disclosure of
information by which a person can be identified and certain court matters of a
more personal nature.
PRINCIPLE 6: Protection of personally identifiable information and certain
personal matters must not impede the business and judicial needs for access
to the information and strong societal reasons for allowing public access to
court records, including individual Due Process rights.
PRINCIPLE 7: The Court of Justice should not restrict access to information
about the maintenance of or access to court records except when necessary to
prevent disclosure of a vulnerability.
PRINCIPLE 8: In-person access to the official court record at the record
custodian’s facility should remain open and free in accordance with the law.
Any other access to court records, provided as a convenience or courtesy
service, should further a public mission.
PRINCIPLE 9: Financial disincentives should not be used to restrict or limit
access to court records.
PRINCIPLE 10: Fees reflective of the associated administrative costs should be
considered when necessary to provide any type of enhanced access to court
records.
PRINCIPLE 11: Whenever necessary to further a public mission or safeguard
against the unnecessary disclosure of other personally identifying information
and certain personal matters, access to court records should be subject to
terms of use.
All sitting. All concur.
ENTERED this 18th day of August, 2026.
_______________________________________
CHIEF JUSTICE
Provenance
- Source
- www.kycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
59f933e71876e405439fcabb74c89ea6a6e65967679e71391d5b08d26cdc3698
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.