KY · rules
Ky. Sup. Ct. Order 2024-06
In Re: Mandatory Electronic Entry of Orders
Supreme Court of Kentucky
2024-06
CORRECTED AMENDED ORDER
In Re: Mandatory Electronic Entry of Orders
In 2013, the Supreme Court approved the first Electronic Filing Pilot Project.
The pilot project eventually expanded statewide and, since October 2015,
electronic filing (eFiling) has been available in every county of the Commonwealth.1
Circuit court clerks are processing between 120,000 and 140,000 eFiling
submittals every month, and over 5.6 million eFiling submittals have been
processed since the program’s inception.
To facilitate the eventual goal of an electronic case record, in July 2022 the
Supreme Court began ordering mandatory eFiling of eligible documents for
attorneys in certain case types. While the Supreme Court has continued to add to
the list of case types in which eFiling is mandatory for attorneys, it has also
strongly encouraged judges to electronically enter their orders into the record,
either on their own or with the assistance of trained judicial support staff. The use
of electronic entry for orders (eOrders) furthers the creation of an electronic case
record and ensures parties are promptly notified of judges’ decisions.
In light of the increasing number of case types in which attorneys are
required to eFile and the steady increase in judges who are trained in and
embracing the use of eOrders, the Court has determined it is appropriate to move
forward with mandatory use of eOrders in specific case types. The Court
recognizes that more time is needed to ensure judges and their judicial support
staff have sufficient training and necessary equipment to enable the entry of
eOrders.
Accordingly, under Section 116 of the Kentucky Constitution and Supreme
Court Rule 1.010, the Supreme Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1 See Administrative Order 2022-65, Administrative Rules of Practice and Procedure, Electronic
Filing in the Kentucky Court of Justice.
Effective March 1, 2024, all district, circuit, and family court judges shall
electronically enter orders in all case types in which eFiling is mandatory for
attorneys.2
In addition to the case types in which eFiling is mandatory for attorneys, the
following AOC forms shall be entered electronically using the current forms
processing tool (i.e., Judge Portal):
1. Notice of Firearm Prohibitions, Form AOC-031;
2. Order Granting/Denying Petition/Motion for Removal of Firearm
Prohibitions, Form AOC-033;
3. Judgment and Order for 60-Day or 360-Day Involuntary Hospitalization
or Involuntary Admission, Form AOC-730; and
4. Disability Judgment, Form AOC-785.
Because of technical limitations, eOrders are not required in the following
circumstances:
1. Orders/documents filed under seal;
2. Docket or calendar orders;
3. Domestic violence orders;
4. Emergency custody orders; and
5. Specialty Court documents.
Effective April 1, 2024, the Circuit Clerk shall reject and return any
conventionally filed order that is eligible for mandatory electronic entry.
This Order does not apply to domestic relations commissioners, trial
commissioners, or retired judges who have been appointed as special judges under
Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution.
Entered this 29th day of February 2024.
All sitting; all concur.
____________________________________
CHIEF JUSTICE
2 For an updated list of mandatory eFiling case types, see the Civil Case Cover Sheet, form
AOC-104, available at: https://www.kycourts.gov/Legal-Forms/Legal%20Forms/104.pdf
Provenance
- Source
- www.kycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
35326d91ce912da18585cb5c7b9fabc93b5efc5cbd4e5012af6279fa5a6a32b0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.