KY · rules
Ky. Sup. Ct. Order 2022-50 36
“Treatment provider” means an individual or agency licensed or certified
to provide substance use or mental health treatment and counseling as
recognized by Specialty Courts and under agreement or memorandum of
understanding (MOU) with the AOC to provide such treatment and
counseling to drug court participants. Mutual aid support groups are not
“treatment providers” under these rules.
Section 3. Key Components of a Drug Court
All drug courts shall include the following key components, as defined and
required by the U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs:
(1) Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services, along
with mental health and co-occurring disorders treatment, with justice
system case processing;
(2) Prosecution and defense counsel, in a non-adversarial manner, promote
public safety while protecting participants’ due process rights;
(3) Eligible participants are identified early and promptly placed in the drug
court;
(4) Drug courts provide a continuum of alcohol, drug, and other treatment
and rehabilitative services;
(5) Participants are subject to frequent alcohol and other drug testing to
monitor compliance with treatment plans;
(6) A coordinated strategy governs drug court responses to participants’
compliance;
(7) Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential;
(8) Monitoring and evaluation of the drug court measure the achievement of
program goals and gauge effectiveness;
(9) Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective drug court
planning, implementation, and operations; and,
(10) Forging partnerships among drug courts, public agencies, and
community-based organizations generates local support and enhances
drug court effectiveness.
Section 4. Administrative Office of the Courts to Oversee Funding and
Establish Policies for Drug Courts
(1) The AOC shall support drug courts statewide and administer and oversee
funding of all certified drug courts.
(2) AOC Specialty Courts shall establish policies relating to drug courts.
AOC Specialty Courts shall develop and maintain the Drug Court
Participant Handbook, which provides general guidelines of
programmatic operations to drug court participants.
Section 5. Referral for Drug Court Eligibility Review and Assessment
A written referral for an eligibility review and assessment for drug court may be
made at any time; however, no person may be referred for an eligibility review
and assessment to a drug court for civil contempt charges under KRS 222.430
– 222.480 (Casey’s Law) and KRS 202A.0811 – 202A.0831 (Tim’s Law).
Section 6. Eligibility Review and Assessment Process for Drug Court
(1) If a defendant was referred for an eligibility review and assessment
consistent with Section 5 of these rules, drug court staff shall thoroughly
explain the drug court process and the Agreement of Participation to the
defendant. The defendant may be required to sign the Agreement of
Participation with or without the presence of their attorney. If a
defendant refuses to sign the Agreement of Participation, drug court staff
shall notify the referring judge. Initial refusal by the defendant to sign the
Agreement of Participation may render them ineligible for participation in
drug court.
(2) Upon execution of the non-waiver portions of the Agreement of
Participation, drug court staff shall complete an assessment. After
completing the assessment, drug court staff shall complete a Notice of
Referral Status. The assessment, Notice of Referral Status, and any
other pertinent information regarding the defendant shall be completed
and submitted to the drug court team prior to the defendant’s next
scheduled court appearance.
(3) Eligibility of a defendant referred to drug court shall be based on the
following:
(a) Empirical evidence indicating which types of offenders can be
treated safely and effectively in drug court, using evidence-based
assessment tools and procedures; and
(b) Ensuring individuals who have historically experienced sustained
discrimination or reduced social opportunities because of their
race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, sexual identity, physical
or mental disability, religion, or socioeconomic status receive the
same opportunities as other individuals to participate and succeed
in the drug court.
(4) Consequences of successful completion of drug court will be detailed
prior to the defendant’s admission into drug court and noted on the
assessment form.
Section 7. Process for Admission of Defendant into Drug Court
Upon receipt of the assessment, Notice of Defendant Referral Status, and other
pertinent information regarding the defendant, the drug court team shall
provide input into the decision for an offer of admission; however, the drug
court judge shall have the final decision-making authority concerning the offer
of admission of an eligible defendant into drug court. To determine whether to
make an offer of admission, the drug court judge and team:
(1) Shall evaluate the current charge(s)/conviction(s);
(2) Shall evaluate past criminal conviction(s), if any;
(3) Shall evaluate the results of the assessment, or risk/needs screening if
held separately from assessment;
(4) May evaluate information regarding the victim(s), or obtained through
victim(s) conferencing, if any; and
(5) May evaluate other relevant information as identified by the drug court
judge and team.
Section 8. Admission of Defendant into Drug Court
Upon an offer of admission into drug court and upon the defendant’s
acceptance of the offer to enter drug court, the referring judge shall complete
an Order of Admission to Drug Court admitting the defendant. If the individual
is facing criminal charges and has yet to enter a guilty plea, then his or her
admission into drug court is conditioned upon the prosecution’s
recommendation of diversion or an alternative sentence in lieu of incarceration.
The case shall remain with or be assigned to a judge who conducts drug court
in the circuit or district where the defendant’s underlying court case is
pending. The defendant shall be required to sign the Agreement of
Participation. The Order of Admission to Drug Court will require the defendant
to report to the assigned circuit or district court judge who will conduct drug
court.
Section 9. Transfers Between Drug Courts
(1) A defendant or participant may request a transfer of venue to participate
in a drug court outside of the circuit or district where their underlying
court case is pending if the defendant has been sentenced to serve an
alternative sentence in lieu of incarceration or has entered a guilty plea
as part of a pretrial diversion program in the underlying court case.
(2) The defendant or participant may request the transfer at the time of
referral for eligibility review and assessment to the drug court or after
admission into a drug court.
(3) If a transfer is requested, the Specialty Court staff in the county where
the underlying court case is pending will initiate an informal conference
with the Specialty Courts staff in the transfer county to inquire about the
possibility of transferring the case to that drug court and to identify any
barriers that may hinder the transfer.
(4) Transfer of venue for the purpose of drug court participation shall be
authorized under the following conditions:
(a) The drug court team in the county where the defendant or
participant requests to transfer venue has agreed to accept the
defendant or participant;
(b) The defendant or participant has filed a Motion for Transfer, which
was docketed before the referring judge; and
(c) The referring judge has entered an order transferring venue of the
defendant’s or participant’s court case.
(d) The defendant’s or participant’s case will be assigned to a circuit or
district court judge who conducts drug court in the county where
venue has been transferred.
(e) Upon a participant’s successful completion, administrative discharge,
or termination from drug court, an order transferring venue of the
court case back to the county where the case originated shall be
entered and all further proceedings shall be placed on the next
available court docket in that county.
Section 10. Drug Court Participant Requirements
(1) Drug court shall consist of five (5) phases as follows:
(a) Phase I – stabilization;
(b) Phase II – treatment stabilization;
(c) Phase III – social development;
(d) Phase IV – self-motivation; and
(e) Phase V – continuing care.
The five (5) phases shall take a minimum of eighteen months (18) for
felony defendants or fifteen (15) months for misdemeanor defendants to
complete.
(2) Drug court participants shall adhere to the following minimum
requirements during each phase:
(a) For Phase I, the participant shall:
i. Provide on average two (2) random urine drug/alcohol
screens per week;
ii. Complete treatment assessment and begin treatment plan,
as directed by the treatment provider;
iii. Create a case plan with the drug court team and begin
working case plan;
iv. Attend all required court sessions;
iv. Obtain and/or maintain court-approved housing;
v. Attend at least one (1) weekly individual contact with drug
court staff;
vi. Indicate an initial understanding of substance use disorder
treatment;
vii. Attend a recovery support program; and
viii. Remain free from the nonmedically indicated use of
intoxicating or addictive substances, including alcohol,
cannabis (marijuana), and prescription medications,
regardless of the licit or illicit status of the substance, for at
least thirty (30) consecutive days before being considered for
promotion to the next phase.
(b) For Phase II, the participant shall:
i. Provide on average two (2) random urine drug/alcohol
screens per week;
ii. Follow all treatment recommendations, as directed by the
treatment provider;
iii. Create a case plan with the drug court team and begin
working case plan;
iv. Attend all required court sessions;
v. Obtain court-approved full-time employment, training,
education, community service, or court-approved community
engagement activities when ordered by the court;
vi. Maintain court-approved housing;
vii. Attend at least one (1) individual contact with drug court
staff per week;
viii. Indicate an appropriate understanding of recovery
principles;
ix. Attend a recovery support program; and
x. Remain free from the nonmedically indicated use of
intoxicating or addictive substances, including alcohol,
cannabis (marijuana), and prescription medications,
regardless of the licit or illicit status of the substance, for the
at least forty-five (45) consecutive days before being
considered for promotion to the next phase.
(c) For Phase III, the participant shall:
i. Provide on average two (2) random urine drug/alcohol
screens per week;
ii. Follow all treatment recommendations, as directed by the
treatment provider;
iii. Create a case plan with the drug court team and begin
working case plan;
iv. Attend all required court sessions;
v. Maintain court-approved full-time employment, training,
education, community service, or court approved community
engagement activities when order by the court;
vi. Maintain court-approved housing;
vii. Make arrangements to satisfy court costs, fees, or fines;
viii. Attend at least one (1) individual contact with drug court
staff per week;
ix. Indicate an appropriate understanding of recovery;
x. Begin criminal thinking curriculum through the treatment
provider;
xi. Establish prosocial activities – e.g. hobbies related to sports,
exercise, art/music, reading, gardening, etc.;
xii. Establish a recovery support system; and
xiii. Remain free from the nonmedically indicated use of
intoxicating or addictive substances, including alcohol,
cannabis (marijuana), and prescription medications,
regardless of the licit or illicit status of the substance, for
sixty (60) consecutive days, before being considered for
promotion to the next phase.
(d) For Phase IV, the participant shall:
i. Provide on average two (2) random urine drug/alcohol
screens per week;
ii. Follow all treatment recommendations, as directed by the
treatment provider;
iii. Create a case plan with the drug court team and begin
working case plan;
iv. Attend all required court sessions;
iv. Maintain court-approved full-time employment, training,
education, community service, or court approved community
engagement activities when ordered by the court;
v. Maintain court-approved housing;
vi. Continue to satisfy court costs, fees, or fines;
vii. Attend at least one (1) individual contact with drug court
staff every other week;
viii. Indicate an appropriate understanding of substance use
disorder treatment;
ix. Engage in prosocial activities – e.g. hobbies related to sports,
exercise, art/music, reading, gardening, etc.;
x. Attend a recovery support program; and
xi. Remain free from the nonmedically indicated use of
intoxicating or addictive substances, including alcohol,
cannabis (marijuana), and prescription medications,
regardless of the licit or illicit status of the substance, for a
total of ninety (90) consecutive days before being considered
for promotion to the next phase.
(e) For Phase V, the participant shall:
i. Provide on average two (2) random urine drug/alcohol
screens per week;
ii. Follow all treatment recommendations, as directed by the
treatment provider;
iii. Create a case plan with the drug court team and begin
working case plan;
iv. Attend all required court sessions;
v. Maintain court-approved full-time employment, training,
education, community service, or court approved community
engagement activities when ordered by the court;
v. Maintain court-approved housing;
vi. Continue to satisfy court costs, fees, or fines;
vii. Attend at least one (1) individual contact with drug court
staff each month;
viii. Development of continuing care plan through treatment
provider;
x. Maintain a recovery lifestyle;
xi. Maintain prosocial activities – e.g. hobbies related to sports,
exercise, art/music, reading, gardening, etc.;
xii. Maintain a recovery support program; and
xiii. Remain free from the nonmedically indicated use of
intoxicating or addictive substances, including alcohol,
cannabis (marijuana), and prescription medications,
regardless of the licit or illicit status of the substance, for at
least ninety (90) to one hundred eighty (180) consecutive
days in Phases 4 and 5 before program completion.
(3) Drug court participants, if ordered to do so, shall comply with
additional requirements, such as support services, medical and/or
mental health referrals, and subsequent treatment
recommendations.
Section 11. Prosocial Activities & Strength-Based Approaches
(1) Prosocial activities shall be integrated into programming to align with the
expectations outlined in Section 10. Prosocial activities shall be
individualized to meet the needs of each participant.
(2) Examples of prosocial activities may include, but are not limited to, yoga,
meditation, praying, exercising, volunteer work, cooking, coaching,
engaging in outdoor sport activities, playing a musical instrument,
joining a support group, and chairing self-help meetings.
(3) Strength-based approaches, such as those that focus on an individual’s
self-determination and strength, shall be used in case management.
Specialty Courts staff shall adhere to the following components of
strength-based case management:
(a) Utilizing strengths-based assessments to identify a participant’s
abilities and strengths;
(b) Coordinating community resources to address the individual needs
of the participant;
(c) Person-centered planning, emphasizing the participant’s focused
goal(s) to elicit buy-in; and
(d) Building a strong professional relationship for collaboration.
(4) Examples of strength-based approaches may include, but are not limited
to, utilizing person-centered or recovery-centered language, focusing on
relationship building and collaboration, building capacity based on
individual strengths, creating and sustaining familial support, practicing
transparency and honesty, intentionally focusing on inclusion and
diversity, etc.
Section 12. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments
(1) Incentives, sanctions, and therapeutic adjustments shall be
administered by the drug court judge. The judge will be assisted by the
drug court team who will advise the judge from their areas of expertise.
Discussion of incentives, sanctions, and therapeutic adjustments occur
during the drug court staffing. Judicial oversight must ensure that:
(a) Consequences are predictable, individualized, fair and consistent.
Positive behaviors should result in incentives, with praise and
encouragement from the judge. Negative behaviors should result in
graduated sanctions based on the participant’s current ability to
comply. Sanctions should be accompanied by appropriate
therapeutic adjustments which are distinct from sanctions and
should be suggested by a licensed treatment provider.
(b) Participants shall receive positive and negative consequences that
are equivalent to those received by other participants in the same
phase of the program who are engaged in comparable conduct.
Participants receive positive and negative consequences without
regard to their gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, socioeconomic
status, or sexual orientation.
(c) Consequences are communicated in advance. Policies and
procedures for incentives and sanctions may be specified in writing
in the Drug Court Participant Handbook and shall be
communicated with participants and the drug court team
members in advance. Policies shall provide a clear indication of
behaviors that result in an equitable range of incentives or
sanctions based on the unique needs of the participant.
(d) The drug court judge and drug court team may reserve a
reasonable degree of discretion to individualize consequences
considering circumstances presented in each case.
(e) Participants shall be allowed an opportunity to explain their
perspectives pertaining to situations which result in the imposition
of incentives, sanctions, and therapeutic adjustments. A clear
justification for the positive, negative, or therapeutic adjustment
imposed will be explained by the judge during the drug court
session.
(f) Communications with participants are delivered by the judge in
the drug court session in a professional manner. Participants shall
not be shamed, and consequences shall be presented without
anger, ridicule, foul or abusive language, or comparison.
(2) Drug courts shall seek to place emphasis on incentivizing productive and
positive behaviors in accordance with Best Practice Standards.
Incentives should occur at a ratio of at least 4:1 compared to sanctions.
The following shall be considered when responding to participant’s
positive behaviors:
(a) Opportunities for praise, rewards and encouragement should
accompany positive improvements, even if other sanctions are
administered in the same session. Small and incremental changes
in behavior should be rewarded and encouraged as well as major
achievements.
(b) “Proximal” goals, within the current ability of the participant to
comply, are rewarded, with the eventual (“distal”) goal of increasing
participant involvement in productive activities such as
abstinence, employment, and prosocial activities.
(c) Incentives may include small, tangible rewards provided by the
drug court team, a temporary decrease in drug court
requirements, and an increase or advancement in phase. Praise
and encouragement from the judge are the most effective
incentives.
(d) Cash cannot be used as incentives. General funds cannot be used
to purchase incentives other than as set forth in the KCOJ
Reimbursement for Justices’ and Judges’ Administrative Expenses
policy or other applicable court rule or procedure.
(3) Failure to comply to the requirements and other conditions established
by the drug court may result in the imposition of sanctions upon a
participant. Sanctions shall be applied with certainty and immediacy
where possible by the drug court judge with input from the drug court
team. The following shall be considered when responding to participant
noncompliance:
(a) As participants move through the phases, the consequences for
infractions may increase accordingly. Progressive sanctions shall
be utilized for continuous noncompliance along with recommended
therapeutic response(s).
(b) For goals that are difficult for participants to accomplish, the
sanctions may increase slowly but progressively in magnitude over
successive infractions.
(c) For goals that are relatively easy for participants to accomplish,
higher magnitude sanctions may be administered after only a few
infractions.
(d) Consequences are imposed for the nonmedically indicated use of
intoxicating or addictive substances, including alcohol, cannabis
(marijuana) and prescription medications, regardless of the licit or
illicit status of the substance. The drug court team relies on expert
medical input to determine whether a prescription for an addictive
or intoxicating medication is medically indicated and whether
nonaddictive, nonintoxicating, and medically safe alternative
treatments are available.
(e) Incarceration is imposed judiciously and sparingly. Unless a
participant poses an immediate risk to public safety, jail sanctions
are administered only after less severe consequences have been
ineffective at deterring infractions. Jail sanctions are definite in
duration and typically last a short time. Jail sanctions over three
to five days are discouraged.
(f) Participants may be terminated from the drug court if they no
longer can be managed safely in the community or if they fail to
comply with treatment or supervision requirements. Participants
are not terminated from the drug court for continued substance
use if they are otherwise compliant with their treatment and
supervision conditions, unless they are nonamenable to the
treatments that are reasonably available in their community.
(4) Participants do not receive punitive sanctions if they are otherwise
compliant with their treatment and supervision requirements but are not
responding to the current treatment interventions. Under such
circumstances, the treatment provider may reassess the individual and
adjust the treatment plan accordingly. The following shall be considered
when making therapeutic adjustments:
(a) Adjustments to treatment plans shall be based on the
recommendations of duly trained treatment professionals.
(b) The drug court judge, with input from the treatment provider, may
order these therapeutic adjustments resulting in additional
referrals for services or treatment.
Section 13. Suspended Status
(1) In the event a situation arises in which it becomes impracticable for a
participant to meet drug court requirements and/or be supervised by
Specialty Courts staff, the drug court judge shall issue an order placing
the defendant on suspended status and releasing Specialty Courts staff
from supervision responsibilities. Examples of impracticability may
include but are not limited to, contagious or infectious disease, short-term medical care for a family member, or any other reason that would
cause a temporary inability to meet drug court requirements or to be
supervised by Specialty Courts staff. Once the defendant has the ability
to resume participation in the drug court program and be supervised by
Specialty Courts staff, the drug court judge shall enter an order
resuming active status and returning the participant to drug court
supervision.
(2) During the time in which the participant is suspended, no credit shall be
earned toward the completion of the drug court phases.
(3) In the event that the suspended status is the result of the participant
receiving in-patient rehabilitation in a facility approved by the drug court
and the participant successfully completes rehabilitation, after the
participant has resumed standard drug court participation for thirty (30)
days, it shall be at the discretion of the drug court judge to determine
whether any credit should be given toward the completion of a drug
court phase(s) for the time spent in the approved rehabilitation program.
Section 14. Administrative Discharge
(1) If a drug court participant cannot complete drug court through no fault
of their own, they may be administratively discharged. If the drug court
team determines that administrative discharge is appropriate, the
Specialty Courts staff shall complete a Notice of Administrative
Discharge to provide to the drug court judge. The Notice of
Administrative Discharge shall be filed in the official court record and the
case shall be assigned to the appropriate circuit or district court judge or
venue shall be transferred as provided in Section 9.
(2) An administrative discharge does not preclude future eligibility for drug
court.
Section 15. Voluntary Termination
Participants may request voluntary termination from drug court utilizing a
Request for Voluntary Termination. Drug court participants have the right to
consult with their attorney. If the drug court judge determines that the request
is knowingly and voluntarily made, the drug court judge shall grant the
request. Upon entry of the Notice of Voluntary Termination, the case shall be
assigned to the appropriate circuit or district court judge or venue shall be
transferred as provided in Section 9.
Section 16. Involuntary Termination
(1) The Specialty Courts staff or drug court team may make a verbal
recommendation to the drug court judge to terminate a participant due
to the participant’s non-compliance. If the drug court judge agrees to
review the recommendation of termination, Specialty Courts staff shall
complete an Affidavit of Violations, requesting the drug court judge
terminate the participant from drug court. If the drug court judge
decides termination is appropriate, a Notice of Termination shall be
completed. The participant shall be notified of their termination during
the drug court session, unless the participant has absconded as
provided in subsection (2) of this Section.
(2) If a participant has absconded for a period of at least fifteen (15) days,
the drug court judge may sign a Notice of Termination without the
participant being notified and present during the drug court session.
(3) Upon entry of the Notice of Termination, the case shall be assigned to the
appropriate circuit or district court judge or venue shall be transferred
as provided in Section 9 for further proceedings.
(4) The Notice of Termination shall be filed in the official record.
(5) All participants listed as “suspended-absconded” shall be reviewed
monthly with the drug court judge and drug court team.
Section 17. Successful Completion of Drug Court
(1) A participant shall be determined to have successfully completed drug
court when they have:
(a) Completed all five (5) drug court phases;
(b) Paid all restitution owed, unless the participant is unable to pay
restitution in full while in drug court, in which case the drug court
team may require a reasonable amount be paid;
(c) No criminal charges pending against them; and
(d) Paid all court costs, fines, and/or fees owed pursuant to KRS
533.030 before graduation if required to do so by the drug court
judge after consultation with the drug court team.
(2) Upon successful completion of drug court, the sentencing judge may:
(a) Dismiss the underlying charge(s) if the participant was on
diversion but only when restitution, if any, has been paid in full;
(b) Modify the probated sentence to be conditionally discharged, but
only when restitution, if any, has been paid in full; or
(c) Enter an order resolving, dismissing, or disposing of a contempt
charge.
(3) A drug court graduation should be held within ninety (90) days of the
participant’s successful completion of all five (5) phases of drug court, or
at the discretion of the drug court judge.
Section 18. Drug Court Staffings
(1) The drug court judge and Specialty Courts staff shall attend staffings
prior to drug court sessions. The prosecutor, defense attorney, and other
drug court team members are encouraged to attend these staffings.
Drug court staffings shall be confidential and non-team members shall
not attend absent extraordinary circumstances. If there is an
extraordinary need for a non-team member to attend, upon approval by
the drug court judge, the non-team member shall be allowed to attend
the staffing, but only after signing a confidentiality agreement.
(2) At a drug court staffing, the drug court team shall discuss the following:
(a) Whether to admit potential participants into drug court;
(b) Appropriate behavior modification responses for violations by
current participants;
(c) Achievements and phase advancement of participants who will be
attending the drug court session; and
(d) Other pertinent issues relating to drug court participants.
Section 19. Drug Court Sessions
(1) A drug court judge shall conduct drug court sessions as follows:
(a) One (1) drug court session per week, unless weekly sessions are
not possible, then a drug court judge shall conduct at least two (2)
drug court sessions per month; and
(b) May be conducted in person, virtually, or a combination thereof.
(2) Drug court judges shall maintain an official court record of all drug court
sessions through written or recorded means.
Section 20. Confidentiality
(1) Drug court proceedings, including drug court staffings and sessions,
shall be confidential, and all proceedings shall be closed unless otherwise
authorized by the drug court judge.
(2) Documents contained in a participant’s drug court case file shall be
confidential, not subject to disclosure, and maintained separately from
the underlying court case file, except for those documents specified in
Section 21 of these rules.
(3) In accordance with federal regulations regarding substance abuse
treatment programs, drug court team members shall sign a
confidentiality agreement.
(4) Drug court team members shall comply with state and federal
confidentiality laws regarding treatment information.
Section 21. Filing of Drug Court Documents
Upon utilization of any of the following documents, the document(s) shall be
filed by the Specialty Courts staff with the appropriate court clerk for inclusion
in the court record of the underlying court case file:
(1) Order Referring for Assessment to Drug Court;
(2) Drug Court Notice of Defendant Referral Status;
(3) Order of Admission;
(4) Motion for Transfer;
(5) Order Transferring;
(6) Order Designating Temporary Inactive Status;
(7) Order Resuming Active Status;
(8) Defendant’s Motion to Extend Probation for Completion;
(9) Order Extending Probation;
(10) Notice of Voluntary Termination;
(11) Notice of Violations (shall only be filed when the violations result in
termination);
(12) Notice of Termination; and
(13) Acknowledgement of Successful Completion or Notice of
Administrative Discharge.
Section 22. Collection of Fees
(1) Specialty Courts staff shall not collect any fees, fines, or other costs from
participants at any time.
(2) Drug court judges shall not impose financial sanctions of any kind.
(3) No drug court judge or Specialty Courts staff shall collect monies for use
by the drug court through forfeiture, plea agreements, sanctions, fees,
fines or other costs, other than those referred to herein.
Section 23. Drug Testing
(1) Drug testing is a vital component of drug courts.
(2) The following procedures shall apply to all drug courts.
(a) Drug testing shall be administered to all participants on a frequent
and random basis. Participants in all phases will be randomly
tested at least two (2) times per week.
(b) Drug tests performed by individuals other than the Specialty
Courts staff, the drug court team, or a drug testing vendor under
contract or MOU with the AOC shall not be admissible in drug
court.
(c) All participants shall be required to make daily telephone contact,
utilizing a toll-free telephone number, wherein a recording
announces phase(s) and times for specimen collections for each
drug court.
(d) Instant, laboratory, and other drug tests supplied by the drug
court shall be utilized for drug court participants only. Inventory
of supplies shall be audited on a random basis.
(e) Trauma informed practices, for the purpose of drug testing, shall
be clearly identified and followed. Training will be provided to all
Specialty Courts staff.
Section 24. Monitoring and Evaluation of Drug Courts
Drug courts are committed to ensuring fidelity to Best Practice Standards and
will measure their effectiveness through the following practices:
(1) Reviewing drug court outcomes by monitoring participant enrollment in
and attendance to scheduled appointments, drug and alcohol test
results, graduation rates, lengths of stay, in-program technical
violations, and new arrests;
(2) Monitoring recidivism rates, including new arrests, new convictions, and
new incarcerations, for at least two years following each participant’s exit
from the drug court;
(3) Participating in independent evaluations of adherence to best practices
and participant outcomes, and developing and implementing remedial
action plans based on the recommendations of the evaluator, in order to
address deficiencies with fidelity;
(4) Continually monitoring admission rates, services delivered, and
outcomes achieved for members of groups that have historically
experienced discrimination;
(5) Creating remedial action plan(s) to correct disparities and examine the
success of the remedial actions; and
(6) Maintaining an electronic database, known as the Management
Information System (MIS), to track participant engagement, program
outcomes, and provide real-time program statistics.
Section 25. Authorization for Drug Court Judges and New Drug Courts
(1) Before presiding over a drug court, a judge shall submit a request to
SPCrequest@kycourts.net for approval by the Chief Justice of the
Kentucky Supreme Court. If approved, the Chief Justice shall enter an
order establishing the judge’s jurisdictional authority.
(2) AOC Specialty Courts shall provide appropriate training to the drug
court judge and Specialty Courts staff.
Section 26. Drug Court Team Training
(1) Drug court teams shall attend a formal pre-implementation training
before starting a new drug court. Training shall include, but is not
limited to, information on Best Practice Standards and the roles and
responsibilities of the drug court team members.
(2) Drug court team members who are asked to join an existing team shall
attend an orientation where they will be introduced to the drug court
model and receive training on local practices, if any. New drug court
team members, including judges, will receive training that includes, but
is not limited to, information on Best Practice Standards and the roles
and responsibilities of the drug court team members.
(3) Drug court team members, including judges, shall attend continuing
education training at least once a year to ensure they have the most up-to-date knowledge about best practices on topics including substance
use disorder and mental health treatment, complementary treatment
and social services, behavior modification, community supervision, team
decision making, and constitutional and legal issues in drug courts.
Section 27. Kentucky Court of Justice Specialty Courts Certification
Board
(1) Statement of Purpose and Scope. The Certification Board shall:
(a) Establish and oversee all aspects of the specialty courts
certification process as set forth in Section 28 of these rules,
including but not limited to, the establishment of certification
requirements and criteria consistent with the Best Practice
Standards, submission of certification requests or applications and
timeframes for courts that require an improvement plan;
(b) Conduct an annual review of these rules, the Court of Justice
Rules of Administrative Procedure, AP Part XIII, Procedures for
Specialty Courts, and recommend any necessary updates or
revisions to the Supreme Court;
(c) Assess certification observation procedures, processes, and forms
developed and implemented by AOC Specialty Courts;
(d) Establish a communication plan for the specialty courts
certification process with local court jurisdictions, the court
system, and if appropriate, the public;
(e) Define timelines for the ongoing assessment and review procedures
for certified specialty courts;
(f) Submit local jurisdiction certification recommendations to the
Chief Justice for final approval;
(g) Provide to the Chief Justice a list of those jurisdictions that are on
improvement plans, as well as the timelines for future certification
review and consideration; and
(h) Other matters as directed by the Chief Justice.
(2) Certification Board Members. The eleven (11) member Kentucky Court
of Justice Specialty Courts Certification Board shall be appointed by the
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and shall serve up to a 3-year term.
Members may be reappointed by the Chief Justice to the Certification
Board for one additional 3-year term.
The Certification Board will consist of nine (9) members of the Judiciary,
one (1) Circuit Court Clerk, and the AOC Director or designee. The nine (9)
members of the Judiciary shall consist of the following:
(a) Three (3) current drug court judges (at least one (1) from circuit
court and one (1) from district court);
(b) One (1) current veterans treatment court judge;
(c) One (1) current mental health court judge;
(d) One (1) current family recovery court judge;
(e) One (1) current juvenile recovery court judge;
(f) One (1) retired judge with experience presiding over a specialty
court; and
(g) One (1) “at large” judge (from circuit, district or family courts).
(3) Designation of a Certification Board Chair and Vice-Chair. The Chief
Justice will select one (1) board member to serve as the Certification
Board Chair and one (1) additional board member to serve as the
Certification Board Vice-Chair. The Chair or Vice-Chair may be
responsible for setting the agenda, calling the meeting to order and
adjourning the meeting, and designating the date, time, and location of
meetings.
(4) Quorum. Six (6) board members shall constitute a quorum in order to
transact business. All determinations shall be made by a majority of
board members in attendance. Board members may attend meetings via
in-person, video, or telephone conference. Board members shall recuse
from any business before the Certification Board involving a specialty
court over which they preside.
(5) Records. Pursuant to KRS 26A.200, all records received, generated,
kept, or maintained by or on behalf of the Certification Board shall be the
property of the KCOJ and are subject to the control of the Supreme
Court of Kentucky. All records created for or generated by the
Certification Board shall not be considered Administrative Records of the
AOC as defined by AP Part XVII.
(6) Staff Support. The AOC will provide staff support to the Certification
Board.
Section 28. Drug Court Certification Process
(1) Drug courts participating in the certification pilot program shall fulfill all
certification requirements established by the Certification Board.
(2) No drug court may be certified unless it is recommended for certification
by the Certification Board.
(3) Each drug court judge participating in the certification pilot program will
submit a certification application for review of local program operations.
This will include all components referenced within the Kentucky
Specialty Courts Quality Assurance and Fidelity Model.
(a) If a judge seeks to participate in the certification pilot program,
Specialty Courts certification staff will work in tandem with the
judge to complete the application process, to identify
opportunities, and to identify and overcome any barriers.
(b) If a drug court participating in the certification pilot program is not
yet certified and/or has new judicial leadership, Specialty Courts
certification staff will consult with the drug court judge and drug
court team to discuss their intent to apply for certification and the
application process.
(c) If a certified drug court undergoes new judicial leadership,
Specialty Courts certification staff will consult with the drug court
judge and drug court team to discuss their intent to maintain
certification, pending the next certification review.
(4) Specialty Courts certification staff will initiate a meeting with the drug
court judge and Specialty Courts staff to obtain necessary information
after an application is submitted.
(5) Specialty Courts certification staff shall provide a final report to the
Certification Board for review and consideration in support of
certification. The final report shall include:
(a) A review of the drug court’s compliance with these rules,
Memorandums of Agreement (MOAs), Memorandums of
Understanding (MOUs), and various fiscal considerations, such as,
drug testing, treatment supports, and Medicaid/insurance
applications;
(b) A summary of Best Practice Standards implemented by the drug
court;
(c) Any specialty court highlights, innovative approaches, and/or
exemplary practices;
(d) All areas of concern regarding Best Practice Standards established
by these rules;
(e) Recommendations for technical assistance, training, and areas of
improvement;
(f) A summary of the observation tool findings; and
(g) Any additional observations or recommendations.
(6) The Certification Board will review the Final Report and submit a
recommendation to the Chief Justice.
(7) The Chief Justice will make a determination of certification.
a. If approved, the Chief Justice will issue an order of certification;
b. If an improvement plan is necessary, the Specialty Courts
certification staff will collaborate with the drug court judge and
Specialty Courts staff to develop the plan and resubmit for
certification.
(8) Compliance with these rules, certification criteria, and the Best Practice
Standards shall be reviewed every three (3) years through internal
mechanisms including peer reviews and Specialty Courts certification
staff assessments. Information gleaned from those reviews and
assessments will be used to assist with evaluations of local specialty
court outcomes. A report of all drug court certification reviews will be
compiled and provided to the Certification Board.
This Order shall be effective March 1, 2023, and until further Order of
this Court.
Entered this 25th day of October 2022.
All sitting; all concur.
___________________________________
CHIEF JUSTICE
Provenance
- Source
- www.kycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
41f24e7d41e8c1e0e788ae5855cd466e9969155bed1b7a745a322e3fe4a76938
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.