Bindinglaw

KY · rules

Ky. Sup. Ct. Order 2022-31

Authorization for Release of Information Pursuant to RCR 4.08(f)

activein force · 2022-06-07 – presentact-effective-date

Supreme Court of Kentucky

2022-31

ORDER

IN RE: Authorization for Release of Information Pursuant to RCR 4.08(f)

In Order 2021-11, the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) requested and

the Kentucky Supreme Court authorized the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

to release data regarding information supplied to representatives of Kentucky Pretrial

Services during defendants’ initial interviews or subsequent contacts. NCSC’s data

request was for the sole purpose of evaluating the impact of various types of court date

notifications on rates of failure-to-appear.

To further evaluate the court date notification process on rates of failure-to-appear, NCSC has requested that the AOC conduct a study in three pilot counties

with a specific focus on text notifications. AOC has agreed that this information may

be useful in determining the efficacy of the text notification system.

RCr 4.08 provides that information supplied by a defendant to a representative

of Kentucky Pretrial Services during the defendant’s initial interview or subsequent

contacts, or information obtained by Kentucky Pretrial Services as a result of the

interview or subsequent contacts, shall be deemed confidential and shall not be

subject to disclosure. Subsection (f) of the rule provides that “any person conducting

an evaluation of the pre-trial release program may have access to all completed

interview forms upon order of the Supreme Court.”

Upon consideration of NCSC’s request to review and evaluate Kentucky’s

pretrial data, and based on the authority under RCr 4.08(f), the Supreme Court

hereby authorizes the AOC, subject to an executed Memorandum of Understanding

setting forth requirements concerning confidentiality and redisclosure, to:

1. Conduct a study in Pike, Christian and Fayette counties where the

defendants will be asked specific questions regarding court notification and

reappearance; and

2. Design specific texts related to the defendant’s responses in that study and

release any data to NCSC related to the court notification system and

process in relation to that study, including any statewide court notification

data and all data referenced in Order 2021-11.

This Order shall be effective upon entry and until further Order of this Court.

Entered this 7th day of June 2022.

All sitting; all concur.

_______________________________________

CHIEF JUSTICE

Provenance

Source
www.kycourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
32ca7a084107b29270b99a864a9c9c851ce8b7ddbd5f8843a8909a10b32980d1
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.