KY · rules
Ky. Sup. Ct. Order 2020-02
Authorization for the Open Courts Pilot Project
Supreme Court of Kentucky
2020-02
IN RE: Authorization for the Open Courts Pilot Project
ORDER
I. Introduction and Purpose
In 2016, the Kentucky General Assembly enacted SB 40 requesting that
the Supreme Court of Kentucky institute a pilot project to study the feasibility
and desirability of the opening or limited opening to the public of the following
court proceedings, except if related to sexual abuse: Dependency, Neglect, and
Abuse (DNA) proceedings under KRS Chapter 620 and Termination of Parental
Rights (TPR) proceedings under KRS Chapter 625. The pilot project may be
established in a minimum of three diverse judicial districts or circuits, or
division(s) thereof, chosen by the Chief Justice and must last for four years,
unless extended or limited by the General Assembly. The Open Courts Pilot
Project has been operating pursuant to Supreme Court Administrative Order
2018-05.
For calendar year 2020, Divisions 1, 2, 5, and 6 of the 22nd Circuit
Family Court (Fayette County) have been chosen by the Chief Justice to
participate in the Open Courts Pilot Project. This Order hereby authorizes the
courts referenced herein to open court proceedings related to DNA and TPR
(except if related to sexual abuse) to the public.
II. Implementing Legislation
Through 2016 SB 40, the Kentucky General Assembly enacted the
following legislation: KRS 21A.190, “Pilot project to study the feasibility and
desirability of conducting some open juvenile proceedings”; KRS 21A.192,
“Procedures for courts participating in pilot project authorized by KRS
21A.190”; and KRS 610.072, “Attendance of public at hearings in courts
participating in pilot project authorized by KRS 21A.190.”
III. Authority
This Order is entered under the authority granted to the Supreme Court
of Kentucky by:
A. Section 116 of the Kentucky Constitution to prescribe rules and issue
orders of practice and procedure for the Kentucky Court of Justice; and,
B. KRS 21A.190 to establish pilot projects in a minimum of three diverse
judicial districts or circuits, or division(s) thereof, chosen by the Chief
Justice for the purpose of studying the feasibility and desirability of
opening some DNA and TPR proceedings to the public.
IV. Observation and Evaluation
A. The observation period for the Open Courts Pilot Project for calendar year
2020 will last from January 27, 2020, to February 21, 2020 (Observation
Period).
B. During the Observation Period, the Administrative Office of the Courts
(AOC) will be present and observe the four divisions chosen to participate
in the Open Courts Pilot Project.
C. Following the Observation Period and pursuant to KRS 21A.190(3), the
AOC will evaluate the Open Courts Pilot Project to determine the
following:
1. Whether there are adverse effects resulting from the opening of
DNA and TPR proceedings;
2. Whether the Open Courts Pilot Project demonstrates a benefit to
the litigants, the public, or both;
3. Whether the Open Courts Pilot Project supports a determination
that DNA and TPR proceedings should be presumptively open or,
alternatively, whether they should be closed;
4. How open proceedings under the Open Courts Pilot Project impact
the child;
5. The parameters and limits of the Open Courts Pilot Project;
6. Suggestions for the operation and improvement of the Open Courts
Pilot Project;
7. Whether any Rules changes are needed if the Open Courts Pilot
Project is to be made permanent and expanded to all courts; and
8. Whether any statutory changes are recommended if the program is
to be made permanent and expanded to all courts.
V. Implementation
A. For calendar year 2020, the AOC will collect data as follows:
1. Court records will be gathered throughout the Observation Period.
2. Surveys and court observation tools will be completed daily during
the Observation Period.
3. Focus groups will be conducted in February or March of 2020.
B. All data collected from court records, surveys, court observation tools,
and focus groups will be evaluated to determine the impact and
effectiveness of the Open Courts Pilot Project.
C. In accordance with KRS 21A.190(4), the AOC will provide an annual
report to the Legislative Research Commission, the Interim Joint
Committee on Health and Welfare, and the Interim Joint Committee on
Judiciary with its statistics, findings, and recommendations on the Open
Courts Pilot Project by September 1, 2020. The AOC will make periodic
progress and statistical reports as deemed necessary by the Chief
Justice.
VI. Procedure
A. Courts chosen to participate in the Open Courts Pilot Project must:
1. Open all DNA and TPR proceedings (except if related to sexual
abuse) to the public during the Observation Period only.
2. Set parameters for members of the public related to attendance at
open proceedings and information obtained during the
proceedings;
3. Establish a procedure to require each member of the public
attending a proceeding not to disclose the name or personal
identifying information of any person who is a party to, or is
testifying at, the proceeding.
B. Courts chosen for the Open Courts Pilot Project may close the hearing or
any part thereof upon motion of a party or upon its own motion if the
court determines that closure is in the best interest of the child, the
public, or for other good cause shown. The party seeking closure will
have the burden of proof.
1. The court must give priority to the best interest of the child.
2. The court must consider all relevant circumstances of the case,
including but not limited to:
i.The nature of the allegations;
ii.The age and maturity level of the child;
iii.The benefit to the public of an open hearing;
iv. The effect of confidentiality on the fact-finding process;
v. The wishes of the parties, victims, and the parents of any
child involved in the case; and,
vi. Whether reasonable alternatives to closure are available.
3. When determining whether to close a proceeding, the court must
make written findings of fact and conclusions of law using form
AOC-DNA-OC-1,Order Granting Denying Closure of Hearing to the
Public Pursuant to KRS 21A.192. Any order of closure shall be no
broader than is necessary to protect the interests asserted by the
party seeking closure.
C. Courts chosen for the Open Courts Pilot Project shall not:
1. Release any record discussed during an open proceeding which is
made confidential pursuant to law;
2. Permit any audio, visual, or other recording of the proceeding by
any party to the proceeding or by any person who is attending or
testifying at the proceeding;
3. Permit any audio, visual, or other recording of the proceeding
made for official court purposes to be made a public record, copied,
or released to the public; or
4. Permit any member of the public who is not a party to or testifying
at the proceeding to disclose, outside the courtroom, the name or
personal identifying information of any party or person testifying at
the proceeding.
D. Taking notes and removing them from the courtroom is permitted
provided that no name or personal identifying information of any minor
who is a party to, or is testifying at, the proceeding shall be taken from
the courtroom. This does not apply to, and does not limit the use or
publication of, any information obtained by means other than attendance
at an open proceeding authorized by this Order.
VII. Limitations
A. The public shall not be permitted to attend DNA or TPR hearings:
1. In a court that is not participating in the Open Courts Pilot Project,
except as otherwise authorized by law;
2. If the case is related to sexual abuse; or
3. When the judge presiding over the case has determined that the
hearing or any portion thereof shall be closed.
VIII. Termination
The Open Courts Pilot Project will be governed by this Order and all
applicable statutes and rules not inconsistent with this Order.
This Order shall be effective upon entry, and until further Order of this Court.
Entered this 10th day of January 2020.
________________________________
CHIEF JUSTICE
Provenance
- Source
- www.kycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
198b50d1421ab86245acf683b46eec667e295f6429c5a924ac02af8a5639ce03
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.