Bindinglaw

KS · rules

Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 7.042

Affirmance by Summary Opinion

activein force · 2012-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Generally. The court may affirm by summary opinion a case in which the requirements of subsection (b) are satisfied.

(b) Requirements for Affirmance by Summary Opinion. A case may be affirmed by summary opinion if the court determines after argument or submission on the briefs that no reversible error of law appears and:

(1) the appeal is frivolous;

(2) the appeal is without merit;

(3) the findings of fact of the district court, the findings of fact of the administrative tribunal, or the verdict of the jury is supported by substantial competent evidence;

(4) the findings of fact of the district court, the findings of fact of the administrative tribunal, or the verdict of the jury is supported by clear and convincing evidence;

(5) the opinion or findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court or administrative tribunal adequately explain the decision; or

(6) the district court or administrative tribunal did not abuse its discretion.

(c) Form of Opinion. An opinion issued under this rule must cite the rule and indicate one or more factors under subsection (b) the court has determined are applicable. The opinion must be in the following form: “Affirmed under Rule 7.042(b) [(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) and/or (6)].”

History

[History: New rule effective January 16, 1981; Am. effective October 7, 2004; Am. effective September 2, 2008; Restyled rule effective July 1, 2012.]

Provenance

Source
www.kscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
b1c5ec2a0876bf8719d3c41ec888e6f5dce5c64b3cdcc2889e1f4786bafbb638
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.