Bindinglaw

KS · rules

Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 608

Cooperation

activein force · 2019-05-01 – presentact-effective-date

A judge must cooperate with the Commission, an Inquiry Panel, or a Hearing Panel. A judge must respond to any inquiry concerning the judge’s conduct within the time required by a panel. A judge’s lack of response may be considered a failure or refusal to cooperate. A judge’s failure or refusal to cooperate in an investigation, use of dilatory practices, frivolous or unfounded responses or argument, or other uncooperative behavior may be considered a violation of Canon 1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

History

[History: New rule adopted effective May 1, 2019.]

Provenance

Source
www.kscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
3386f05638fc1816a5530c8b824d1f50998faf4025076b85e8784b44a457cfaa
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 608 — Cooperation · binding.law